Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, London, UK.
Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Int Wound J. 2019 Apr;16(2):354-359. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13039. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
Donor site aesthetic outcomes of epidermal graft (EG) vs split-thickness skin graft (SSG) have yet to be objectively compared. Here, we evaluate donor site healing using a validated scar assessment tool and digital colorimetric technique, which compares colour in a consistent and objective manner. Ten patients (SSG (n = 5) and EG (n = 5)) were included. Donor site scarring was evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) at Week 6 and Month 3. Colorimetric measurement was performed at Weeks 3 and 6 and Month 3. The mean donor site healing time for EG was significantly shorter (EG: 4.6 days (95% c.i. 3.8-5.3), SSG: 16.8 days (95% c.i. 13.3-20.1) (P = 0.003)). The VSS scores of the EG donor site were lower at Week 6 and Month 3(P < 0.001). The colour match between the donor site and surrounding skin for EG was better compared with SSG at all time points and was almost identical to their surrounding healthy skin at Month 3. This study is the first to objectively measure the clinical appearance of the EG donor site against SSG. EG donor site has faster healing with excellent scarring and good colour match with its surrounding normal skin at all time points compared with SSG.
供区皮片(EG)与刃厚皮片(SSG)的美学效果尚未得到客观比较。在这里,我们使用经过验证的疤痕评估工具和数字比色技术来评估供区愈合情况,该技术以一致和客观的方式比较颜色。纳入 10 名患者(SSG(n=5)和 EG(n=5))。在第 6 周和第 3 个月使用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)评估供区疤痕。在第 3 周、第 6 周和第 3 个月进行比色测量。EG 的供区愈合时间明显更短(EG:4.6 天(95%置信区间 3.8-5.3),SSG:16.8 天(95%置信区间 13.3-20.1)(P=0.003))。EG 供区在第 6 周和第 3 个月的 VSS 评分较低(P<0.001)。与 SSG 相比,EG 的供区在所有时间点与周围皮肤的颜色匹配更好,在第 3 个月时与周围正常皮肤几乎相同。这项研究首次客观地测量了 EG 供区与 SSG 的临床外观。与 SSG 相比,EG 供区愈合更快,疤痕更少,与周围正常皮肤的颜色匹配更好。