• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较消费者外出就餐体验,这些消费者试图避免不同的食物过敏原。

Comparing the eating out experiences of consumers seeking to avoid different food allergens.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

Allergy Action, St Albans, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):1263. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6117-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-6117-y
PMID:30442121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6238278/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eating outside the home is challenging for consumers with food allergy (FA) and intolerance (FI) and lack of allergen information provision in eating out venues can lead to unnecessary restrictions. Following European legislation (2014) designed to improve allergen information provision, little is known about differences in information provision experienced by consumers seeking to avoid particular allergens, or how this impacts on their eating out experiences. This study compared the information provision that consumers with FA/FI to different allergens experience when eating out.

METHODS

Using mixed methods, participants were recruited from across the UK and took part in self-report surveys or in-depth interviews. Surveys were completed by 232 participants avoiding either gluten (n = 66), nuts (peanuts/tree nuts) (n = 94), or milk (n = 74), and responses were subject to quantitative analyses. Interviews were carried out with 49 participants avoiding either gluten (n = 13), nuts (n = 14), milk (n = 13) or a combination of these allergens (n = 9), and analysed using the framework approach.

RESULTS

Although general improvements in information provision following the legislation were reported, variations in provision between allergen groups led participants seeking to avoid milk to conclude that their dietary needs were less well-understood and seen as less important. These perceptions were reflected in a reluctance to involve eating out venue staff in deliberations about the potential for milk-free meal options.

CONCLUSIONS

The provision of visual indicators of the presence of milk and of staff trained in allergen-awareness would improve the eating out experiences of consumers seeking to avoid milk. Medical professions can play a key role in encouraging these patients to pursue their right to make enquiries about allergens in order to avoid accidental milk ingestion when eating out.

摘要

背景

对于患有食物过敏(FA)和不耐受(FI)的消费者来说,外出就餐具有挑战性,而外出就餐场所缺乏过敏原信息供应可能会导致不必要的限制。根据旨在改善过敏原信息供应的欧洲法规(2014 年),对于试图避免特定过敏原的消费者所经历的信息供应差异或这如何影响他们的外出就餐体验,我们知之甚少。本研究比较了 FA/FI 消费者在外出就餐时避免不同过敏原时的信息供应情况。

方法

使用混合方法,从英国各地招募参与者,并让他们参与自我报告调查或深入访谈。有 232 名避免食用麸质(n=66)、坚果(花生/树坚果)(n=94)或牛奶(n=74)的参与者完成了调查,并且对调查结果进行了定量分析。对 49 名避免食用麸质(n=13)、坚果(n=14)、牛奶(n=13)或这些过敏原组合(n=9)的参与者进行了访谈,并使用框架方法进行了分析。

结果

尽管报告了法规实施后信息供应的总体改善,但不同过敏原群体之间的供应差异导致试图避免牛奶的参与者得出结论,认为他们的饮食需求了解不够,也不被认为很重要。这些看法反映在他们不愿意让外出就餐场所的员工参与关于无奶餐选择的讨论。

结论

提供牛奶存在的视觉指示和受过过敏原意识培训的员工将改善试图避免牛奶的消费者的外出就餐体验。医疗专业人员可以在鼓励这些患者行使询问过敏原的权利方面发挥关键作用,以避免在外出就餐时意外摄入牛奶。

相似文献

1
Comparing the eating out experiences of consumers seeking to avoid different food allergens.比较消费者外出就餐体验,这些消费者试图避免不同的食物过敏原。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):1263. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6117-y.
2
Eating out with a food allergy in the UK: Change in the eating out practices of consumers with food allergy following introduction of allergen information legislation.在英国,有食物过敏外出就餐:过敏原信息法规出台后,食物过敏消费者外出就餐行为的变化。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2018 Mar;48(3):317-324. doi: 10.1111/cea.13072. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
3
Consumer Preferences for Written and Oral Information about Allergens When Eating Out.外出就餐时消费者对有关过敏原的书面和口头信息的偏好。
PLoS One. 2016 May 25;11(5):e0156073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156073. eCollection 2016.
4
Parents' and caregivers' experiences and behaviours when eating out with children with a food hypersensitivity.父母及照料者在与食物过敏儿童外出就餐时的经历和行为。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 20;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4594-z.
5
Epidemiology of food allergy/food intolerance in adults: associations with other manifestations of atopy.成人食物过敏/食物不耐受的流行病学:与其他特应性表现的关联。
Allergy. 2001 Dec;56(12):1172-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.00196.x.
6
The challenges for nut-allergic consumers of eating out.外出就餐的坚果过敏消费者所面临的挑战。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Feb;41(2):243-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03649.x. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
7
Food allergen knowledge, attitude and practices among UK consumers: A structural modelling approach.英国消费者的食物过敏原知识、态度和实践:一种结构建模方法。
Food Res Int. 2019 Jun;120:375-381. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
8
Responses of consumers with food allergy to the new allergen-labelling legislation in Saudi Arabia: a preliminary survey.沙特阿拉伯新过敏原标签立法对食物过敏消费者的反应:初步调查。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec;24(17):5941-5952. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002500. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
9
Food allergy: practical approach on education and accidental exposure prevention.食物过敏:教育与预防意外接触的实用方法。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Sep;48(5):174-81.
10
Impact of ingredient labeling practices on food allergic consumers.成分标注做法对食物过敏消费者的影响。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Nov;95(5):426-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61166-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Food Allergies on the Food Safety and Life Quality of Adults in Spain.食物过敏对西班牙成年人食品安全和生活质量的影响。
Foods. 2025 Mar 10;14(6):939. doi: 10.3390/foods14060939.
2
Experiences and perceptions of people with celiac disease, food allergies and food intolerance when dining out.乳糜泻、食物过敏和食物不耐受患者外出就餐时的经历与看法。
Front Nutr. 2024 Feb 2;11:1321360. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1321360. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of an Intervention on Healthy Offerings and Allergenic Food Management in Restaurants: A Parallel Randomized Controlled Study.干预措施对餐厅提供健康食品和管理致敏食物的影响:一项平行随机对照研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 22;15(23):4869. doi: 10.3390/nu15234869.
4
Awareness of Food Allergies and Allergens on the Menus of Restaurants and Cafes among Saudi Female University Students.沙特女大学生对餐厅和咖啡馆菜单上食物过敏及过敏原的认知
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;11(9):1259. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091259.
5
Peanut Can Be Used as a Reference Allergen for Hazard Characterization in Food Allergen Risk Management: A Rapid Evidence Assessment and Meta-Analysis.花生可用作食品过敏原风险管理中危害特征描述的参照过敏原:快速证据评估和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Jan;10(1):59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
Responses of consumers with food allergy to the new allergen-labelling legislation in Saudi Arabia: a preliminary survey.沙特阿拉伯新过敏原标签立法对食物过敏消费者的反应:初步调查。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec;24(17):5941-5952. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002500. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
7
Food anaphylaxis in the United Kingdom: analysis of national data, 1998-2018.英国食物过敏反应:1998-2018 年全国数据分析。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 17;372:n251. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n251.
8
Non-Nutritive (Artificial) Sweetener Knowledge among University Students.非营养性(人工)甜味剂知识在大学生中的普及情况。
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 12;11(9):2201. doi: 10.3390/nu11092201.
9
Perceptions of Food Hypersensitivity Expertise on Social Media: Qualitative Study.社交媒体上对食物过敏专业知识的认知:定性研究
Interact J Med Res. 2019 Jun 28;8(2):e10812. doi: 10.2196/10812.

本文引用的文献

1
Eating out with a food allergy in the UK: Change in the eating out practices of consumers with food allergy following introduction of allergen information legislation.在英国,有食物过敏外出就餐:过敏原信息法规出台后,食物过敏消费者外出就餐行为的变化。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2018 Mar;48(3):317-324. doi: 10.1111/cea.13072. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
2
Food-induced anaphylaxis to a known food allergen in children often occurs despite adult supervision.尽管有成人监护,儿童因已知食物过敏原引发的食物过敏反应仍经常发生。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2017 Nov;28(7):715-717. doi: 10.1111/pai.12770. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Parents' and caregivers' experiences and behaviours when eating out with children with a food hypersensitivity.父母及照料者在与食物过敏儿童外出就餐时的经历和行为。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 20;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4594-z.
4
Impaired health-related quality of life in adolescents with allergy to staple foods.主食过敏青少年的健康相关生活质量受损。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2016 Sep 30;6:37. doi: 10.1186/s13601-016-0128-5. eCollection 2016.
5
Validation of the English Version of the Scale for Psychosocial Factors in Food Allergy and the Relationship with Mental Health, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy.食物过敏心理社会因素量表英文版的效度验证及其与心理健康、生活质量和自我效能感的关系
J Allergy (Cairo). 2016;2016:4850940. doi: 10.1155/2016/4850940. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
6
Consumer Preferences for Written and Oral Information about Allergens When Eating Out.外出就餐时消费者对有关过敏原的书面和口头信息的偏好。
PLoS One. 2016 May 25;11(5):e0156073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156073. eCollection 2016.
7
Can we identify patients at risk of life-threatening allergic reactions to food?我们能否识别出有生命威胁的食物过敏反应风险的患者?
Allergy. 2016 Sep;71(9):1241-55. doi: 10.1111/all.12924. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
8
Parental confidence in managing food allergy: development and validation of the Food Allergy Self-Efficacy Scale for Parents (FASE-P).家长管理食物过敏的信心:父母食物过敏自我效能感量表(FASE-P)的编制与验证。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2015 Nov;45(11):1681-9. doi: 10.1111/cea.12599.
9
Health-related quality of life in children with objectively diagnosed staple food allergy assessed with a disease-specific questionnaire.使用特定疾病问卷评估客观诊断为主食过敏儿童的健康相关生活质量。
Acta Paediatr. 2015 Oct;104(10):1047-54. doi: 10.1111/apa.13044. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
10
Increase in anaphylaxis-related hospitalizations but no increase in fatalities: an analysis of United Kingdom national anaphylaxis data, 1992-2012.过敏性反应相关住院病例增加,但死亡病例未增加:对1992 - 2012年英国全国过敏性反应数据的分析
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Apr;135(4):956-963.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Nov 25.