Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Apr;115:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is the most common illicit substance use disorder and individuals with CUD have high rates of comorbid anxiety disorders. Comorbidity between CUD and anxiety disorders is of public health relevance given that although motivation enhancement therapy (MET) combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious intervention for CUD, outcomes are worse for patients with elevated anxiety. The current study tested the acceptability and efficacy of the integration of a transdiagnostic anxiety CBT (i.e., treatment of patients with any anxiety disorder) with MET-CBT (integrated cannabis and anxiety reduction treatment, or ICART) for CUD compared to MET-CBT alone. Treatment-seeking cannabis users (56.4% male, M = 23.2, 63.3% non-Hispanic White) with CUD and at least one comorbid anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to ICART (n = 27) or MET-CBT (n = 28). Patients in the ICART condition attended significantly more treatment sessions than those in the MET-CBT condition. Patients in the ICART condition were more likely to be abstinent post-treatment than those in MET-CBT. Further, treatment produced decreases in cannabis use and related problems. Notably, therapy type did not moderate the impact of treatment on frequency of use and related problems. Together, these data suggest that ICART may be at least as efficacious as a gold-standard psychosocial CUD treatment, MET-CBT, for a difficult-to-treat subpopulation of cannabis users.
大麻使用障碍(CUD)是最常见的非法物质使用障碍,患有 CUD 的个体焦虑障碍共病率很高。鉴于动机增强治疗(MET)联合认知行为治疗(CBT)是治疗 CUD 的有效干预措施,但对于焦虑程度较高的患者,治疗效果较差,因此 CUD 和焦虑障碍共病具有公共卫生相关性。本研究测试了将跨诊断焦虑 CBT(即治疗任何焦虑障碍的患者)与 MET-CBT(综合大麻和焦虑减轻治疗,或 ICART)整合治疗 CUD 的可接受性和疗效,与单独的 MET-CBT 相比。患有 CUD 和至少一种共病焦虑障碍的寻求治疗的大麻使用者(56.4%为男性,M=23.2,63.3%为非西班牙裔白人)被随机分配到 ICART(n=27)或 MET-CBT(n=28)组。ICART 组的患者接受的治疗次数明显多于 MET-CBT 组。治疗后,ICART 组患者的戒断率高于 MET-CBT 组。此外,治疗还减少了大麻使用和相关问题。值得注意的是,治疗类型并没有调节治疗对使用频率和相关问题的影响。综上所述,这些数据表明,对于大麻使用者这一难以治疗的亚群,ICART 可能至少与 MET-CBT 等金标准心理社会 CUD 治疗一样有效。