Beh Zhi Yuen, Au Yong Phui Sze, Lye Siyu, Eapen Sneha Elizabeth, Yoong Chee Seng, Woon Kwee Lian, Cheng Lim Jimmy Guan
Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;62(10):765-772. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_387_18.
Continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) is an underutilised anaesthetic technique. Our objectives were to evaluate the use of CSA in our institution, its efficacy, ease to use and safety.
This was a retrospective analysis conducted in a tertiary centre. Records of all patients who underwent surgery and received CSA between December 2008 and July 2017 were reviewed. Their demographic profiles, type and duration of surgery were analysed. The outcomes measured were the success of CSA, technical evaluation and difficulties encountered, intraoperative haemodynamics, usage of vasopressors and any reported complications. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test.
Three hundred and eighteen patients (94%) successfully underwent surgery using CSA. Twenty cases (6%) had failed CSA, of which five of them had CSA insertion failure, while the rest failed to complete the operation under CSA, thus requiring conversion to general anaesthesia. Patients who have had an initial intrathecal local anaesthetic (LA) volume ≥1.5 ml had higher odds (odds ratio (OR) 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-4.57) of developing hypotension compared to those who had <1.5 ml ( < 0.001). There were no reported post-dural puncture headache, neurological sequelae or infection.
CSA is a useful anaesthetic technique with low failure rate. The key to achieving haemodynamic stability is by giving a small initial bolus, then titrating the block up to required height using aliquots of 0.5 ml of intrathecal LA through the catheter.
连续脊髓麻醉(CSA)是一种未得到充分利用的麻醉技术。我们的目标是评估我院CSA的使用情况、疗效、易用性和安全性。
这是在一家三级中心进行的回顾性分析。回顾了2008年12月至2017年7月期间所有接受手术并接受CSA的患者的记录。分析了他们的人口统计学资料、手术类型和持续时间。测量的结果包括CSA的成功率、技术评估和遇到的困难、术中血流动力学、血管升压药的使用情况以及任何报告的并发症。使用卡方检验进行统计分析。
318例患者(94%)成功使用CSA进行了手术。20例(6%)CSA失败,其中5例CSA穿刺失败,其余患者未能在CSA下完成手术,因此需要转为全身麻醉。初始鞘内局部麻醉药(LA)体积≥1.5 ml的患者发生低血压的几率(优势比(OR)2.78;95%置信区间[CI],1.70 - 4.57)高于LA体积<1.5 ml的患者(<0.001)。未报告硬膜穿刺后头痛、神经后遗症或感染。
CSA是一种有用的麻醉技术,失败率低。实现血流动力学稳定的关键是先给予小剂量初始推注,然后通过导管使用0.5 ml鞘内LA等分剂量将阻滞滴定至所需高度。