• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[连续脊髓麻醉]

[Continuous spinal anesthesia].

作者信息

Möllmann M

机构信息

Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, St Franziskus-Hospital Münster.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1997 Jul;46(7):616-21. doi: 10.1007/s001010050446.

DOI:10.1007/s001010050446
PMID:9304364
Abstract

Continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) is a further means of central nerve block for anaesthesia besides single-shot spinal (SSS), combined spinal/epidural, and epidural anaesthesia. Major advantages compared to SSS are the possibility of subsequent injection of local anaesthetic via the indwelling catheter, which enables analgesia to be maintained over a longer period. Moreover, the haemodynamic effects are diminished by this mode of application. The most important advantages of CSA compared to continuous epidural anaesthesia are the more rapid onset of action, better quality of analgesia, and better muscle relaxation. Since small doses of local anaesthetic are used in CSA, there is less danger of systemic toxic reactions. The microcatheters used up to now for CSA are introduced via relatively large needles that cause perforation trauma to the dura, resulting in loss of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and thus a higher incidence of post-dural punctive headache. Hence, further technical developments must have the objectives of reducing needle diameter and increasing catheter diameter. Perforation trauma to the dura is reduced by using small needles. Use of a larger catheter enables better mixing of the local anaesthetic with the CSF, and it is easier to aspirate CSF in order to establish the correct position of the catheter.

摘要

连续蛛网膜下腔麻醉(CSA)是除单次蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SSS)、腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉和硬膜外麻醉之外的另一种用于麻醉的中枢神经阻滞方法。与单次蛛网膜下腔阻滞相比,其主要优点是可以通过留置导管后续注射局部麻醉药,从而能够维持更长时间的镇痛。此外,这种给药方式可减轻血流动力学效应。与连续硬膜外麻醉相比,连续蛛网膜下腔麻醉最重要的优点是起效更快、镇痛质量更好以及肌肉松弛效果更佳。由于连续蛛网膜下腔麻醉使用的局部麻醉药剂量较小,发生全身毒性反应的风险较低。目前用于连续蛛网膜下腔麻醉的微导管是通过相对较粗的穿刺针置入的,这会对硬脊膜造成穿孔损伤,导致脑脊液(CSF)流失,进而使腰麻后头痛的发生率更高。因此,进一步的技术改进必须以减小穿刺针直径和增大导管直径为目标。使用细针可减少对硬脊膜的穿孔损伤。使用较粗的导管能使局部麻醉药与脑脊液更好地混合,并且更容易抽出脑脊液以确定导管的正确位置。

相似文献

1
[Continuous spinal anesthesia].[连续脊髓麻醉]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Jul;46(7):616-21. doi: 10.1007/s001010050446.
2
[Continuous spinal anesthesia versus continuous epidural anesthesia in surgery of the lower extremities. A prospective randomized study].[连续脊髓麻醉与连续硬膜外麻醉用于下肢手术的前瞻性随机研究]
Reg Anaesth. 1991 Aug;14(5):83-7.
3
[The reuse of 29-gauge spinal needles following combined spinal-epidural anesthesia].
Anaesthesist. 1992 Dec;41(12):769-71.
4
Comparison of continuous spinal anaesthesia using a 32-gauge catheter with anaesthesia using a single-dose 24-gauge atraumatic needle in young patients.32G导管连续蛛网膜下腔麻醉与单剂量24G无创伤穿刺针麻醉用于年轻患者的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1994 Dec;73(6):747-50. doi: 10.1093/bja/73.6.747.
5
Continuous spinal anaesthesia using a standard epidural set for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.使用标准硬膜外套件进行连续脊髓麻醉用于体外冲击波碎石术。
Can J Anaesth. 1997 Oct;44(10):1042-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03019224.
6
A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery.单次脊麻最大头端感觉阻滞与腰麻-硬膜外联合技术用于剖宫产的随机试验。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):240-5. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818e0fa6.
7
[Subdural intra-arachnoid spread of local anesthetics. A complication of spinal anesthesia].[局部麻醉药的硬脑膜下蛛网膜下腔扩散。脊髓麻醉的一种并发症]
Anaesthesist. 1992 Nov;41(11):685-8.
8
[The effect of puncture needle on the subarachnoid catheter position in continuous spinal ansthesia].[穿刺针在连续脊麻中对蛛网膜下腔导管位置的影响]
Anaesthesist. 1995 Dec;44(12):826-30. doi: 10.1007/s001010050218.
9
[Continuous spinal anesthesia vs. combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in emergency surgery. The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia technique does not offer an advantage of spinal anesthesia with a microcatheter].[急诊手术中连续脊麻与腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉的比较。腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉技术并不优于带微导管的脊麻]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Nov;46(11):938-42. doi: 10.1007/s001010050489.
10
Anaesthetic and haemodynamic effects of continuous spinal versus continuous epidural anaesthesia with prilocaine.丙胺卡因用于连续脊麻与连续硬膜外麻醉的麻醉及血流动力学效应
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jan;20(1):26-30. doi: 10.1017/s026502150300005x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical characteristics of spinal levobupivacaine: hyperbaric compared with isobaric solution.脊髓左旋布比卡因的临床特征:高压溶液与等压溶液的比较。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:169076. doi: 10.1100/2012/169076. Epub 2012 Apr 24.