Suppr超能文献

患者对患者偏好信息在监管决策中的价值的看法:瑞典类风湿关节炎患者的定性研究。

Patient Perspectives on the Value of Patient Preference Information in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

机构信息

Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 564, 752 37, Uppsala, Sweden.

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM) and Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre (ECMC), Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient. 2019 Jun;12(3):297-305. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0344-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in involving patient preferences for benefits and risks in regulatory decision making. Therefore, it is essential to identify patient perspectives regarding the value of patient preference information (PPI).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore how patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) value the use of PPI in regulatory decision making regarding medical products.

METHODS

Regulators and patients with RA were interviewed to gather initial insights into opinions on the use of PPI in regulatory decisions regarding medical products. The interviews were used to draft and validate the interview guide for focus groups with patients with RA. Participants were purposively sampled in collaboration with the Swedish Rheumatism Association in Stockholm and Uppsala. Each focus group consisted of three to six patients (18 in total). All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

According to the participants, PPI could lead to regulators considering patients' needs, lifestyles and well-being when making decisions. PPI was important in all stages of the medical product lifecycle. Participants reported that, when participating in a preference study, it is important to be well-informed about the use of the study and the development, components, administration, and risks related to the medical products.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients thought PPI could be valuable to consider in regulatory decisions. It is essential for patients to be well-informed when asked for their preferences. Research on information materials to inform patients in preference studies is needed to increase the value of PPI in regulatory decision making.

摘要

背景

越来越多的人对将患者对获益和风险的偏好纳入监管决策中感兴趣。因此,确定患者对患者偏好信息(PPI)价值的看法至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在探讨类风湿关节炎(RA)患者如何看待在与医疗产品监管决策中使用 PPI。

方法

对监管机构和 RA 患者进行访谈,以初步了解对在与医疗产品监管决策中使用 PPI 的意见。访谈用于起草和验证 RA 患者焦点小组的访谈指南。参与者与斯德哥尔摩和乌普萨拉的瑞典风湿病协会合作进行有目的的抽样。每个焦点小组由三到六名患者组成(总共 18 名)。所有访谈均进行录音、逐字转录,并使用内容分析法进行分析。

结果

根据参与者的说法,PPI 可以促使监管机构在做出决策时考虑患者的需求、生活方式和幸福感。PPI 在医疗产品生命周期的所有阶段都很重要。参与者报告说,在参与偏好研究时,了解研究的使用以及与医疗产品相关的开发、组成、管理和风险非常重要。

结论

患者认为 PPI 在监管决策中可能具有价值。在征求患者偏好时,患者必须充分了解情况。需要研究告知偏好研究中患者的信息材料,以增加 PPI 在监管决策中的价值。

相似文献

2
Rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Nov 8;17(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1319-x.
7
Decision Needs and Preferred Strategies for Shared Decision-Making in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Perspectives of Canadian Urban Indigenous Women.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Aug;74(8):1325-1331. doi: 10.1002/acr.24579. Epub 2022 May 11.
8
Shared decision making about palliative chemotherapy: A qualitative observation of talk about patients' preferences.
Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;31(7):625-633. doi: 10.1177/0269216316676010. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
10
Dilemmas of participation in everyday life in early rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative interview study (The Swedish TIRA Project).
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(14):1251-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.961658. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

4
Opportunities and Challenges of Web-Based and Remotely Administered Surveys for Patient Preference Studies in a Vulnerable Population.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Nov 15;15:2509-2517. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S327006. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparing the needs and preferences of patients with moderate and severe dry eye symptoms across four countries.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 15;4(1):e000360. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000360. eCollection 2019.
8
Patient Preference Studies During Early Drug Development: Aligning Stakeholders to Ensure Development Plans Meet Patient Needs.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Apr 24;6:82. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00082. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Preference phenotypes to facilitate shared decision-making in rheumatoid arthritis.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 May;77(5):678-683. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212407. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
Patient Preferences in Regulatory Benefit-Risk Assessments: A US Perspective.
Value Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(6):741-745. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.008.
6
Patient-Focused Benefit-Risk Analysis to Inform Regulatory Decisions: The European Union Perspective.
Value Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(6):734-740. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
7
Treatment preferences of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete-choice experiment.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Nov;55(11):1959-1968. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew280. Epub 2016 Jul 31.
8
The value of quantitative patient preferences in regulatory benefit-risk assessment.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2014 Apr 1;2. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v2.22761. eCollection 2014.
9
Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 May 26;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0444-9.
10
Rheumatoid arthritis.
Lancet. 2016 Oct 22;388(10055):2023-2038. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8. Epub 2016 May 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验