Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Oct 3;19(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03371-y.
Gene therapy is currently in development for several monogenetic diseases including lysosomal storage disorders. Limited evidence is available on patient preferences for gene therapy in this population. In this study, we compare gene therapy-related risk tolerance between people affected by three lysosomal storage diseases currently faced with different therapeutic options and prognoses.
A survey including the probabilistic threshold technique was developed in which respondents were asked to choose between gene therapy and the current standard of care. The attributes included to establish participants' risk tolerance were previously identified in focus groups of affected people or their representatives, namely: risk of mild side effects, severe side effects, the need for additional medication, and the likelihood of long-term effectiveness. The survey was distributed among people receiving outpatient care for type 1 Gaucher disease (good prognosis with current treatment options), Fabry disease (varying prognosis with current treatment options, XY-genotype on average more severely affected than XX), and parents representing people with severe forms of mucopolysaccharidosis type III A/B (poor prognosis, no disease-specific therapy available).
A total of 85 surveys were completed (15 Gaucher disease respondents, 62 Fabry disease respondents (17 self-identifying male), eight parents of ten people with mucopolysaccharidosis type III). Disease groups with higher disease severity trended towards higher risk tolerance: Gaucher disease respondents were most cautious and predominantly preferred the current standard of care as opposed to MPS III representatives who were more risk tolerant. Respondents with Fabry disease were most heterogeneous in their risk tolerance, with male participants being more risk tolerant than female participants. Long-term effectiveness was the attribute in which respondents tolerated the least risk.
People affected by a lysosomal storage disease associated with a poorer prognosis and less effective current treatment options trended towards more risk tolerance when choosing between gene therapy and the current standard of care. This study shows the importance of involvement of patient preferences before and during the development process of new treatment modalities such as gene therapy for rare diseases, to ensure that innovative therapies align with the wishes and needs of people affected by these diseases.
基因治疗目前正在开发用于治疗几种单基因疾病,包括溶酶体贮积症。目前,关于该人群对基因治疗的偏好,仅有有限的证据。在这项研究中,我们比较了三种溶酶体贮积症患者对基因治疗的相关风险承受能力,这些患者目前面临不同的治疗选择和预后。
开发了一项包含概率阈值技术的调查,要求受访者在基因治疗和当前的标准治疗之间做出选择。建立参与者风险承受能力的属性是在受影响人群或其代表的焦点小组中确定的,即:轻微副作用、严重副作用、需要额外药物和长期有效性的可能性的风险。该调查分发给接受 1 型戈谢病(当前治疗方案预后良好)、法布雷病(当前治疗方案预后不同,平均 XY 基因型比 XX 基因型受影响更严重)和代表严重型黏多糖贮积症 IIIA/B 患者(预后差,无特异性治疗)的门诊患者。
共完成了 85 份调查(15 份戈谢病患者,62 份法布雷病患者(17 名自我认定为男性),8 名 III 型黏多糖贮积症患者的 10 名家长)。疾病严重程度较高的疾病组倾向于更高的风险承受能力:戈谢病患者最谨慎,与黏多糖贮积症 III 型代表相比,他们更倾向于选择当前的标准治疗方案。法布雷病患者的风险承受能力最具异质性,男性参与者比女性参与者更能承受风险。长期有效性是受访者最不能承受风险的属性。
在选择基因治疗和当前标准治疗方案之间时,与预后较差和当前治疗方案效果较差的溶酶体贮积症相关的患者倾向于具有更高的风险承受能力。这项研究表明,在开发新的治疗方法(如基因治疗)之前和期间,考虑患者的偏好对于确保创新疗法符合受这些疾病影响的人的愿望和需求非常重要。