Suppr超能文献

注意、新颖性偏好与视觉配对比较任务。

Attention, novelty preference and the visual paired comparison task.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Room 420C, 164 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G9, Canada; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Room 420C, 164 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G9, Canada.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Room 420C, 164 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G9, Canada.

出版信息

Exp Eye Res. 2019 Jun;183:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

Abstract

The innate ability of humans to identify, process and ascribe greater attentional resources (attention bias) to novel stimuli is essential for exploring new opportunities and consequently adapt to changing environments. One of the most common tests to assess attention bias to novel stimuli (Novelty Preference - NP) is the visual paired comparison task (VPC). In the VPC task subjects are presented with novel and previously seen images (repeated images) and NP is measured by parameters that describe visual scanning patterns on these images. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of divided attention on NP. NP was measured in 26 healthy young individuals under two test conditions. In the first condition, subjects performed the VPC task and an audio task simultaneously (divided attention test condition), while in the second condition subjects performed only the VPC task (undivided attention test condition). For each test condition, repeated images were presented after delays ranging from 1.0 to 219.5 s and NP was measured by the mean difference between the relative fixation times on novel and repeated images at each delay. In the divided attention test condition, there were significant differences (p < 0.037) between the magnitudes of NPs for long delays (≥ 162 s) and short delays (≤12.5 s). Such differences were not detected in the undivided attention test condition. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences between the measured NPs during the divided and undivided attention test conditions (F(1, 25) = 18.38, p < 0.001, η = 0.424) and significant interaction effects between delays and testing conditions (F(5,125) = 2.88, p = 0.017, η = 0.103). Post-hoc t-tests showed significant differences between the measured NPs during the divided attention and undivided attention test conditions for long delays (162.0 and 219.5 s) but not for short delays (1.0 and 12.5 s). The results of the study are consistent with the hypothesis that for longer delays between the presentations of repeated images in the VPC task, NP is dependent on the recollection-based item recognition memory system, while for shorter delays NP is dependent on the automatic, familiarity-based item recognition memory system.

摘要

人类识别、处理和赋予新刺激更高注意力资源(注意力偏向)的内在能力对于探索新机会和适应不断变化的环境至关重要。评估对新刺激的注意力偏向(新颖性偏好-NP)的最常用测试之一是视觉配对比较任务(VPC)。在 VPC 任务中,向受试者呈现新的和以前见过的图像(重复图像),并通过描述这些图像上视觉扫描模式的参数来测量 NP。本研究的主要目的是评估分散注意力对 NP 的影响。在两种测试条件下,对 26 名健康年轻个体进行 NP 测量。在第一种条件下,受试者同时执行 VPC 任务和音频任务(分散注意力测试条件),而在第二种条件下,受试者仅执行 VPC 任务(不分心注意力测试条件)。对于每种测试条件,在 1.0 到 219.5 秒的延迟后呈现重复图像,并通过在每个延迟处新图像和重复图像的相对注视时间之间的均值差异来测量 NP。在分散注意力测试条件下,长延迟(≥162 秒)和短延迟(≤12.5 秒)的 NP 之间存在显著差异(p < 0.037)。在不分心注意力测试条件下,未检测到这种差异。方差分析显示,在分散和不分心注意力测试条件下测量的 NP 之间存在显著差异(F(1, 25) = 18.38,p < 0.001,η = 0.424),并且测试条件之间的延迟存在显著的交互效应(F(5,125) = 2.88,p = 0.017,η = 0.103)。事后 t 检验显示,在分散注意力和不分心注意力测试条件下,长延迟(162.0 和 219.5 秒)之间的测量 NP 之间存在显著差异,但短延迟(1.0 和 12.5 秒)之间不存在差异。研究结果与以下假设一致,即在 VPC 任务中重复图像呈现之间的延迟较长时,NP 取决于基于回忆的项目识别记忆系统,而在延迟较短时,NP 取决于基于自动、熟悉的项目识别记忆系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验