Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford St., WC1N 1EH London, UK.
Hippocampus. 2011 Dec;21(12):1268-76. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20836. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
To re-examine whether or not selective hippocampal damage reduces novelty preference in visual paired comparison (VPC), we presented two different versions of the task to a group of patients with developmental amnesia (DA), each of whom sustained this form of pathology early in life. Compared with normal control participants, the DA group showed a delay-dependent reduction in novelty preference on one version of the task and an overall reduction on both versions combined. Because VPC is widely considered to be a measure of incidental recognition, the results appear to support the view that the hippocampus contributes to recognition memory. A difficulty for this conclusion, however, is that according to one current view the hippocampal contribution to recognition is limited to task conditions that encourage recollection of an item in some associated context, and according to another current view, to recognition of an item with the high confidence judgment that reflects a strong memory. By contrast, VPC, throughout which the participant remains entirely uninstructed other than to view the stimuli, would seem to lack such task conditions and so would likely lead to recognition based on familiarity rather than recollection or, alternatively, weak memories rather than strong. However, before concluding that the VPC impairment therefore contradicts both current views regarding the role of the hippocampus in recognition memory, two possibilities that would resolve this issue need to be investigated. One is that some variable in VPC, such as the extended period of stimulus encoding during familiarization, overrides its incidental nature, and, because this condition promotes either recollection- or strength-based recognition, renders the task hippocampal-dependent. The other possibility is that VPC, rather than providing a measure of incidental recognition, actually assesses an implicit, information-gathering process modulated by habituation, for which the hippocampus is also partly responsible, independent of its role in recognition.
为了重新检验选择性海马损伤是否会降低视觉配对比较(VPC)中的新颖性偏好,我们向一组发育性遗忘症(DA)患者呈现了两种不同版本的任务,他们在早期都患有这种疾病。与正常对照组参与者相比,DA 组在一种任务版本上表现出新颖性偏好的延迟依赖性降低,而在两种任务版本的综合结果中则表现出总体降低。由于 VPC 被广泛认为是一种偶然识别的测量方法,因此结果似乎支持海马体有助于识别记忆的观点。然而,这个结论存在一个难题,即根据目前的一种观点,海马体对识别的贡献仅限于鼓励在某些相关背景下回忆项目的任务条件,而根据另一种当前观点,海马体对识别的贡献仅限于对具有高置信度判断的项目的识别,而这种判断反映了强烈的记忆。相比之下,VPC 要求参与者除了观看刺激物之外,完全不受其他指示,因此似乎缺乏这种任务条件,因此可能会基于熟悉度而不是回忆或较弱的记忆来进行识别。然而,在得出 VPC 损伤因此与海马体在识别记忆中的作用的当前两种观点都相矛盾的结论之前,需要调查解决这个问题的两种可能性。一种可能性是,VPC 中的某些变量,例如在熟悉化过程中延长的刺激编码时间,会覆盖其偶然性质,并且由于这种条件促进了基于回忆或基于强度的识别,从而使任务依赖于海马体。另一种可能性是,VPC 不是提供偶然识别的度量,而是实际上评估了一个由习惯化调节的隐含的信息收集过程,海马体对这个过程也有部分责任,而与它在识别中的作用无关。