• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会边缘化女性的癌症风险:一项探索性研究。

Cancer risk in socially marginalised women: An exploratory study.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.009
PMID:30445340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6323356/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a leading cause of premature death in women worldwide, and is associated with socio-economic disadvantage. Yet many interventions designed to reduce risk and improve health fail to reach the most marginalised with the greatest needs. Our study focused on socially marginalised women at two women's centres that provide support and training to women in the judicial system or who have experienced domestic abuse.

METHODS

This qualitative study was framed within a sociological rather than behavioural perspective involving thirty participants in individual interviews and focus groups. It sought to understand perceptions of, and vulnerability to, cancer; decision making (including screening); cancer symptom awareness; and views on health promoting activities within the context of the women's social circumstances.

FINDINGS

Women's experiences of social adversity profoundly shaped their practices, aspirations and attitudes towards risk, health and healthcare. We found that behaviours such as unhealthy eating and smoking need to be understood in the context of inherently risky lives. They were a coping mechanism whilst living in extreme adverse circumstances, navigating complex everyday lives and structural failings. Long term experiences of neglect, harm and violence, often by people they should be able to trust, led to low self-esteem and influenced their perceptions of risk and self-care. This was reinforced by negative experiences of navigating state services and a lack of control and agency over their own lives.

CONCLUSION

Women in this study were at high risk of cancer, but it would be better to understand these risk factors as markers of distress and duress. Without appreciating the wider determinants of health and systemic disadvantage of marginalised groups, and addressing these with a structural rather than an individual response, we risk increasing cancer inequities by failing those who are in the greatest need.

摘要

背景

癌症是全球女性早逝的主要原因之一,且与社会经济劣势相关。然而,许多旨在降低风险和改善健康的干预措施未能覆盖最边缘化、需求最迫切的人群。我们的研究聚焦于两个妇女中心的社会边缘化女性,这些中心为司法系统中的女性或遭受过家庭暴力的女性提供支持和培训。

方法

这项定性研究从社会学而非行为学的角度出发,涉及 30 名参与者的个人访谈和焦点小组。它旨在了解女性对癌症的认知和易感性、决策(包括筛查)、癌症症状意识,以及在女性社会环境背景下对促进健康活动的看法。

结果

女性的社会逆境经历深刻地塑造了她们的行为、愿望和对风险、健康及医疗保健的态度。我们发现,不健康的饮食和吸烟等行为需要在其风险生活环境中得到理解。在极端不利的环境中生活、应对复杂的日常生活和结构性缺陷时,这些行为是一种应对机制。长期遭受忽视、伤害和暴力的经历,往往来自于她们本应信任的人,导致了自尊心低下,并影响了她们对风险和自我护理的认知。这种情况因对国家服务的负面体验以及对自己生活缺乏控制和代理而加剧。

结论

本研究中的女性患癌症的风险很高,但将这些风险因素理解为痛苦和困境的标志会更好。如果不了解健康和边缘化群体系统劣势的更广泛决定因素,并通过结构性而非个体性的应对措施来解决这些问题,我们将有可能通过未能满足最需要的人群而加剧癌症不公平现象。

相似文献

1
Cancer risk in socially marginalised women: An exploratory study.社会边缘化女性的癌症风险:一项探索性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
2
A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances.一项关于在何种情况下哪些宣传干预措施对哪些受虐待妇女有效的现实主义综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 29;6(6):CD013135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013135.pub2.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
Health care equity and access for marginalised young people: a longitudinal qualitative study exploring health system navigation in Australia.卫生保健公平性和边缘化年轻人的可及性:一项在澳大利亚探索卫生系统导航的纵向定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Mar 4;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0941-2.
5
Navigating healthcare systems: A qualitative study on socially marginalised patients' experiences of hospital transition and support by social nurses.医疗系统中的导航:一项关于社会边缘化患者医院过渡经历及社会护士支持的定性研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2024 Jun;38(2):387-397. doi: 10.1111/scs.13236. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
Navigating fragmented services: a gender-based violence (GBV) critical feminist analysis of women's experiences engaging with health and social supports in three Canadian cities.应对碎片化服务:基于性别的暴力(GBV)对加拿大三个城市中女性在寻求健康和社会支持方面经历的批判性女性主义分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):1213. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21919-w.
7
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
8
Barriers to and facilitators of smoking cessation in pregnancy and following childbirth: literature review and qualitative study.孕期及产后戒烟的障碍与促进因素:文献综述与定性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jun;21(36):1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta21360.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Women's Health Hubs: a rapid mixed-methods evaluation.妇女健康中心:快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(30):1-138. doi: 10.3310/JYFT5036.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing cancer stage at diagnosis between migrants and non-migrants: a meta-analysis.移民与非移民人群癌症诊断时的分期比较:一项荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2025 Feb;132(2):158-167. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02896-0. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
The Co-Production, Pilot and Qualitative Evaluation of a Cancer Prevention Programme With High-Risk Women Delivered on Group Walks by Cancer Champions: Shoulder to Shoulder, Walk and Talk.癌症防治倡导者与高危女性在集体步行活动中共同开展的癌症预防项目的联合制作、试点及定性评估:并肩同行,边走边谈。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14175. doi: 10.1111/hex.14175.
3
Perspectives of informal caregivers who support people following hip fracture surgery: a qualitative study embedded within the HIP HELPER feasibility trial.支持髋部骨折手术后患者的非正式照护者的观点:一项嵌入 HIP HELPER 可行性试验的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 17;13(11):e074095. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074095.
4
Qualitative Research Methods in Chronic Disease: Introduction and Opportunities to Promote Health Equity.慢性病定性研究方法:介绍及促进健康公平的机遇。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:37-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105104. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
5
IPVS policy statement. Equity in cervical cancer prevention: for all and not just for some.IPVS政策声明。宫颈癌预防中的公平性:面向所有人而非部分人。
Papillomavirus Res. 2020 Jun;9:100192. doi: 10.1016/j.pvr.2019.100192. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

本文引用的文献

1
"We were on our own": Mothers' experiences navigating the fragmented system of professional care for autism.“我们只能靠自己”:母亲为自闭症寻求专业护理时面临的零碎系统。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Oct;215:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.039. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
2
The education gradient in cancer screening participation: a consistent phenomenon across Europe?癌症筛查参与的教育梯度:欧洲普遍存在的现象?
Int J Public Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):93-103. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-1045-7. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
3
Sex workers as peer health advocates: community empowerment and transformative learning through a Canadian pilot program.性工作者作为同伴健康倡导者:通过加拿大试点项目实现社区赋权和变革性学习。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Aug 30;16(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0655-2.
4
The global burden of women's cancers: a grand challenge in global health.女性癌症的全球负担:全球健康领域的一项重大挑战。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):847-860. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31392-7. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
5
Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult?为什么改变与健康相关的行为如此困难?
Public Health. 2016 Jul;136:109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.030. Epub 2016 May 13.
6
Intimate Partner Violence and Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening: A Gynecologic Oncology Fellow Research Network Study.亲密伴侣暴力与宫颈癌筛查障碍:一项妇科肿瘤学研究员研究网络研究
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016 Jan;20(1):47-51. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000153.
7
Socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical screening coverage in England: are we closing the gap?英格兰乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查覆盖率中的社会经济不平等:我们正在缩小差距吗?
J Med Screen. 2016 Jun;23(2):98-103. doi: 10.1177/0969141315600192. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
8
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.1990年至2013年188个国家301种急慢性疾病和损伤的全球、区域及国家发病率、患病率和伤残调整生命年:全球疾病负担研究2013的系统分析
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
9
A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer education and peer support in prisons.监狱同伴教育和同伴支持的效果和成本效益的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 25;15:290. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1584-x.
10
The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature.世界卫生组织-5 幸福指数:文献系统综述。
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76. doi: 10.1159/000376585. Epub 2015 Mar 28.