• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症防治倡导者与高危女性在集体步行活动中共同开展的癌症预防项目的联合制作、试点及定性评估:并肩同行,边走边谈。

The Co-Production, Pilot and Qualitative Evaluation of a Cancer Prevention Programme With High-Risk Women Delivered on Group Walks by Cancer Champions: Shoulder to Shoulder, Walk and Talk.

作者信息

Hanson Sarah, Hardeman Wendy

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14175. doi: 10.1111/hex.14175.

DOI:10.1111/hex.14175
PMID:39114934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11306970/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Women in the criminal justice system and women who have been subject to domestic abuse are at high risk of cancer but underrepresented in health promotion research. We aimed to co-produce, pilot and evaluate a health promoting programme delivered on group walks.

DESIGN

A programme co-produced by women, based on motivational interviewing, created the opportunity for supportive conversations about cancer prevention.

METHODS

Programme development in two workshops with women with lived experience using authentic vignettes to prompt help-seeking conversations. A small pilot and a qualitative evaluation was done using framework analysis.

RESULTS

The programme appeared acceptable to women and the walk leaders. Women felt included and found it a safe space for sensitive conversations. They appeared empowered and more confident to seek help. Walk leaders expressed confidence in delivering this informal programme, which used prompts rather than delivering didactic training.

CONCLUSION

Cancer prevention for high-risk groups can be delivered in a personalised and novel way by creating informal opportunities for supportive conversations about cancer prevention. Careful co-production of the programme of walks with women, using scenarios and quotes that were authentic vignettes, ensured that these came directly from the women's lived experience and enabled women to talk about change. Our findings indicate that this approach was practical, relevant and acceptable to them with some evidence of women feeling empowered to make informed decisions about their health. We recommend that future cancer prevention programmes for underrepresented groups take an asset-based approach by utilising pre-existing community organisations to increase reach and sustainability.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Women with lived experience co-designed and tested the programme. Provisional findings were fed back to the women and the women's organisation that partnered with this research.

摘要

目标

刑事司法系统中的女性以及遭受家庭虐待的女性患癌症风险很高,但在健康促进研究中的代表性不足。我们旨在共同制作、试点并评估一项通过集体散步开展的健康促进项目。

设计

一项由女性共同制作的项目,基于动机性访谈,为关于癌症预防的支持性对话创造了机会。

方法

通过两个工作坊与有实际经验的女性共同开展项目开发,使用真实案例来引发寻求帮助的对话。采用框架分析法进行了小型试点和定性评估。

结果

该项目似乎为女性和散步领队所接受。女性感到自己被纳入其中,并发现这是一个进行敏感对话的安全空间。她们似乎更有能力且更有信心寻求帮助。散步领队对开展这个非正式项目表示有信心,该项目使用提示而非进行说教式培训。

结论

通过为关于癌症预防的支持性对话创造非正式机会,可以以个性化和新颖的方式为高危人群提供癌症预防服务。与女性仔细共同制作散步项目,使用真实案例的情景和引语,确保这些直接来自女性的实际经历,并使女性能够谈论改变。我们的研究结果表明,这种方法对她们来说是切实可行、相关且可接受的,有一些证据表明女性有能力就自身健康做出明智决策。我们建议,未来针对代表性不足群体的癌症预防项目应采用基于资产的方法,利用现有的社区组织来扩大覆盖面和提高可持续性。

患者和公众参与

有实际经验的女性共同设计并测试了该项目。初步研究结果反馈给了参与本研究的女性及女性组织。

相似文献

1
The Co-Production, Pilot and Qualitative Evaluation of a Cancer Prevention Programme With High-Risk Women Delivered on Group Walks by Cancer Champions: Shoulder to Shoulder, Walk and Talk.癌症防治倡导者与高危女性在集体步行活动中共同开展的癌症预防项目的联合制作、试点及定性评估:并肩同行,边走边谈。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14175. doi: 10.1111/hex.14175.
2
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
4
Chinese women health ambassadors programme: A process evaluation.中国女性健康大使项目:过程评估
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Oct;26(19-20):2976-2985. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13638. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands: creating, delivering and evaluating the lay assessor training programme.与东米德兰兹地区的公众和研究组织成员共同开展公众参与培训:创建、实施和评估外行人评估员培训计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 5;3:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0056-0. eCollection 2017.
6
A multicomponent psychosocial intervention to reduce substance use by adolescents involved in the criminal justice system: the RISKIT-CJS RCT.一项针对卷入刑事司法系统的青少年减少物质使用的多成分心理社会干预措施:RISKIT-CJS RCT 研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(3):1-77. doi: 10.3310/FKPY6814.
7
Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.用于支持国民保健制度健康检查计划决策的建模工具:研讨会、系统评价以及与用户的共同制作。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(35):1-234. doi: 10.3310/hta25350.
8
iSelf-Help: a co-designed, culturally appropriate, online pain management programme in Aotearoa.“自我帮助”:一项在新西兰共同设计的、符合文化背景的在线疼痛管理计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 21;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00339-9.
9
Women's Health Hubs: a rapid mixed-methods evaluation.妇女健康中心:快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(30):1-138. doi: 10.3310/JYFT5036.
10
An 'alcohol health champions' intervention to reduce alcohol harm in local communities: a mixed-methods evaluation of a natural experiment.一项“酒精健康卫士”干预措施,以减少当地社区的酒精危害:一项自然实验的混合方法评估。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Sep;12(9):1-135. doi: 10.3310/HTMN2101.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring non-participation in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies.探索结直肠癌筛查不参与情况:定性研究的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jul;329:116022. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116022. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
2
Mirror, mirror on the wall, when are inequalities higher, after all? Analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening in 30 European countries.镜子,镜子,墙上的镜子,不平等到底何时更高?30 个欧洲国家的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Nov;312:115371. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115371. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
Intimate partner violence in women with breast and gynaecologic cancers: A systematic review.乳腺癌和妇科癌症女性中的亲密伴侣暴力:一项系统综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Apr;79(4):1211-1224. doi: 10.1111/jan.15285. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
Determinants of routine cervical screening participation in underserved women: a qualitative systematic review.服务不足妇女常规宫颈筛查参与的决定因素:定性系统评价。
Psychol Health. 2024 Jan-Feb;39(2):145-170. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2050230. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
The association between adherence to cancer screening programs and health literacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症筛查计划依从性与健康素养的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2022 Feb;155:106927. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106927. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与乳腺癌筛查就诊相关的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e046660. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046660.
7
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
8
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Understanding and Responding to Health Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health.理解和应对健康素养作为健康的社会决定因素。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:159-173. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102529. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
10
Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: a systematic review.欧洲有组织的宫颈癌筛查对宫颈癌死亡率的影响:系统评价。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;127:207-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.013. Epub 2020 Jan 21.