• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出于良心拒诊与医师协助自杀:在英国的可行选择?

Conscientious objection and physician-assisted suicide: a viable option in the UK?

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chester, Chester, UK

St Christopher's Hospice, Cicely Saunders Institute Kings College, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;9(4):464-467. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001541. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001541
PMID:30446490
Abstract

Conscience objection is a proposed way of ensuring that medical practitioners who object to physician-assisted suicide may avoid having to be involved in such a procedure if this is legalised. This right on the part of healthcare professionals already exists in certain circumstances. This paper examines the ethical and legal grounds for conscientious objection for medical professionals and shows how it is heavily criticised in circumstances where it is already used. The paper comes to the conclusion that as the grounds and application of conscience objection are no longer as widely accepted, its future application in any legislation can be called into question.

摘要

出于良心拒行是一种确保反对协助自杀的医生,如果该行为合法化,也不必参与其中的建议方法。在某些情况下,医护人员已经享有这种权利。本文审查了医疗专业人员出于良心拒行的伦理和法律依据,并展示了在已经使用该理由的情况下,它是如何受到强烈批评的。本文得出的结论是,由于出于良心拒行的理由和应用不再被广泛接受,因此在任何立法中对其未来的应用都值得质疑。

相似文献

1
Conscientious objection and physician-assisted suicide: a viable option in the UK?出于良心拒诊与医师协助自杀:在英国的可行选择?
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;9(4):464-467. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001541. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
2
Conscientious Objection: Understanding the Right of Conscience in Health and Healthcare Practice.良心拒斥:理解健康与医疗实践中的良心权利
New Bioeth. 2016 Apr;22(1):33-44. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2016.1151252.
3
Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer.医疗保健中的良心拒斥:为何法庭裁决或许是解决之道。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):213-217. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102970. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
4
Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada.出于良心拒行和道德困境:加拿大安乐死的关系伦理案例研究。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Feb;46(2):123-127. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105855. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
5
Junior doctors and conscientious objection to voluntary assisted dying: ethical complexity in practice.初级医生与自愿协助死亡的良心反对:实践中的伦理复杂性。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Aug;48(8):517-521. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107125. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
6
Conscientious Objection in Australia: A Comparison between Abortion and Voluntary Assisted Dying.澳大利亚的良心拒诊:堕胎与自愿协助死亡的比较。
J Law Med. 2022 Dec;29(4):1079-1089.
7
When should conscientious objection be accepted?何时应该接受出于良心的拒绝?
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jan;38(1):18-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.2011.043646. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
8
Conscientious Objection in Healthcare: Neither a Negative Nor a Positive Right.医疗保健中的良心拒斥:既非消极权利也非积极权利。
J Clin Ethics. 2020 Summer;31(2):146-153.
9
Legal protection and limits of conscientious objection: when conscientious objection is unethical.良心拒斥的法律保护与限制:论良心拒斥何时违背伦理道德
Med Law. 2009 Mar;28(2):337-47.
10
Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen.公共理性与有限的良心拒绝权:对马格伦森的回应。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Mar;44(3):206-209. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104237. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Conscientious objection in euthanasia and assisted suicide: A systematic review.安乐死和协助自杀中的良心拒斥:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326142. eCollection 2025.