Serdar-Eymirli Pinar, Turgut M D, Dolgun A, Yazici A R
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Altindağ, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
Hacettepe University Dental Laser Application and Research Center, Ankara, Turkey.
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Jul;34(5):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2667-6. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of different remineralization agents and laser on caries resistance of primary enamel. In the study, 150 sound primary molars were used. The initial microhardness values were measured and the teeth were randomly assigned to ten treatment groups (n = 15): no treatment/negative control (C), NaF, APF, fluoride varnish (FV), CPP-ACP, laser (L), L + NaF, L + APF, L + FV, L + CPP-ACP. The microhardness values were measured after the treatments and the pH cycle. The obtained data were analyzed statistically. One sample from each group was examined before treatment, after treatment, and after the pH cycle with a scanning electron microscope. While microhardness values after treatment compared to baseline increased, microhardness after the pH cycle decreased compared to after treatment values in all experimental groups (p < 0.05). In regard to the difference in microhardness after the pH cycle and baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between groups C and NaF and between C and CPP-ACP (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference between groups L and L + FV (p < 0.05), while no significant difference was noted between groups L and L + NaF, L + APF, L + CPP-ACP (p > 0.05). As a conclusion, FV is more effective when used in combination with laser than laser alone. NaF, CPP-ACP, and laser may be insufficient in protecting the primary teeth against acid attacks compared to FV used with laser.
本体外研究的目的是确定不同再矿化剂和激光对乳牙釉质抗龋性的影响。在该研究中,使用了150颗完好的乳牙。测量初始显微硬度值,并将牙齿随机分为十个治疗组(n = 15):不治疗/阴性对照(C)、氟化钠(NaF)、酸性磷酸氟(APF)、氟化物漆(FV)、酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙(CPP-ACP)、激光(L)、L + NaF、L + APF、L + FV、L + CPP-ACP。治疗后和进行pH循环后测量显微硬度值。对获得的数据进行统计学分析。每组取一个样本在治疗前、治疗后以及pH循环后用扫描电子显微镜检查。虽然与基线相比,治疗后的显微硬度值增加,但在所有实验组中,pH循环后的显微硬度与治疗后的值相比降低(p < 0.05)。关于pH循环后和基线之间显微硬度的差异,C组和NaF组之间以及C组和CPP-ACP组之间无统计学显著差异(p > 0.05)。L组和L + FV组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05),而L组与L + NaF、L + APF、L + CPP-ACP组之间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。结论是,FV与激光联合使用时比单独使用激光更有效。与FV与激光联合使用相比,NaF、CPP-ACP和激光在保护乳牙免受酸侵蚀方面可能不足。