Suppr超能文献

三种从干血斑中快速提取蚊虫DNA方法的比较分析;适用于基于PCR的技术。

Comparative analysis of three methods from dried blood spots for expeditious DNA extraction from mosquitoes; suitable for PCR based techniques.

作者信息

Panda Barsa Baisalini, Pradhan Nitika, Hazra Rupenangshu K

机构信息

Regional Medical Research Centre (ICMR), Nalco Square, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, 751023, India.

KIIT School of Biotechnology, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India.

出版信息

Mol Biol Rep. 2019 Feb;46(1):151-160. doi: 10.1007/s11033-018-4456-5. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to compare the quality, purity and quantity of DNA isolated from dried blood spots (DBS) by three methods (Chelex-100, QIAamp DNA mini kit, and TE (Tris EDTA)-Buffer). Sample collection was performed in six districts in Odisha, India and screened for cases of clinical malaria and dengue and vector density. Mosquito abdomens were spotted on Whatman 3MM (MERCK) Filter paper and dried for 10 min at room temperature. DNA was isolated from DBS using three methods (Chelex-100, QIAamp DNA mini kit, and TE-Buffer), and PCR was used to determine the feeding behaviours of vector mosquitoes. DNA was quantified using a UV-spectrophotometer, and q-PCR was used to determine the target gene copy number to compare the methods. The QIAamp DNA mini kit method was used as the reference method. The yield and purity of DNA extracted with Chelex-100 and TE were 14-72 ng/µl and 1.51-1.85 and 9-50 ng/µl and 1.68-2.1, respectively. DNA extracted using the Chelex-100 method was stored for over 1 month at - 20 °C and was suitable for later use. The Chelex-100 method had a sensitivity of 99.5% and specificity of 78%. A Bland-Altman plot suggested that the Chelex-100 method was similar to the QIAamp DNA mini kit method for determining the feeding behaviours of vector mosquitoes. The Chelex-100 method is simple, cost-effective, and safe and requires minimal time for DNA extraction from dried blood spots. In malaria and dengue research, detecting the feeding behaviours from mosquito DNA from dried blood spots on filter paper by PCR is an easy, minimally invasive and inexpensive molecular technique that can be performed in remote areas.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较通过三种方法(Chelex-100、QIAamp DNA 微量提取试剂盒和 TE(Tris 乙二胺四乙酸)缓冲液)从干血斑(DBS)中分离的 DNA 的质量、纯度和数量。样本采集在印度奥里萨邦的六个地区进行,对临床疟疾和登革热病例以及媒介密度进行筛查。将蚊虫腹部点样于 Whatman 3MM(默克)滤纸上,并在室温下干燥 10 分钟。使用三种方法(Chelex-100、QIAamp DNA 微量提取试剂盒和 TE 缓冲液)从干血斑中分离 DNA,并使用 PCR 来确定媒介蚊虫的摄食行为。使用紫外分光光度计对 DNA 进行定量,并使用 q-PCR 来确定目标基因拷贝数,以比较这些方法。将 QIAamp DNA 微量提取试剂盒方法用作参考方法。用 Chelex-100 和 TE 提取的 DNA 的产量和纯度分别为 14 - 72 ng/µl 和 1.51 - 1.85 以及 9 - 50 ng/µl 和 1.68 - 2.1。使用 Chelex-100 方法提取的 DNA 在 -20°C 下储存超过 1 个月,适合后续使用。Chelex-100 方法的灵敏度为 99.5%,特异性为 78%。Bland-Altman 图表明,在确定媒介蚊虫的摄食行为方面,Chelex-100 方法与 QIAamp DNA 微量提取试剂盒方法相似。Chelex-100 方法简单、经济高效且安全,从干血斑中提取 DNA 所需时间最少。在疟疾和登革热研究中,通过 PCR 从滤纸上干血斑的蚊虫 DNA 中检测摄食行为是一种简便、微创且廉价的分子技术,可在偏远地区进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验