• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用实践社区方法改善安大略省的放射治疗护理质量。

Improving Quality of Radiation Therapy Care Across Ontario using a Community-of-Practice Approach.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Treatment Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Radiation Treatment Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Mar;9(2):e242-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2018.10.017
PMID:30447404
Abstract

PURPOSE

In 2003 and 2004, Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) divested its assets and staff to regional hospitals, leading to decreased contact between radiation therapy departments across Ontario's Regional Cancer Centres (RCCs). The Radiation Treatment Program (RTP) at CCO developed a communities-of-practice (CoPs) program to rebuild the provincial radiation therapy community to facilitate collaboration among centers, with the goals of decreasing variation in practice and improving the quality of patient care. RTP's CoPs are led and driven by volunteer frontline health care practitioners who identify and prioritize key quality issues and select corresponding projects to pursue.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An evaluation of RTP's CoPs was conducted to assess whether they were successful in knowledge creation, knowledge transfer and exchange, and community building. The framework was developed based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CoP evaluation framework and tools. Data were collected using prospectively administered member surveys (257 surveys), publications, and semistructured interviews (18 participants).

RESULTS

A total of 95% of participants reported that CoP projects were very relevant to their practice, and 50% reported changes in their practice stemming from CoP involvement. In addition, 90% of participants reported growth of their professional network as a result of CoPs. Overall, 93% of participants and 100% of interviewees reported that CoPs are a worthwhile initiative. The largest challenge of CoPs was the time commitment required to participate.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach of member-driven CoPs should be explored and modeled in other health care settings as a means to develop and share knowledge to reduce variation in care and improve the quality of radiation therapy care.

摘要

目的

2003 年和 2004 年,安大略癌症护理中心(CCO)将其资产和员工转让给区域医院,导致安大略省地区癌症中心(RCC)的放射治疗部门之间的联系减少。CCO 的放射治疗计划(RTP)开发了一个实践社区(CoPs)计划,以重建省级放射治疗社区,促进各中心之间的合作,目标是减少实践中的差异,提高患者护理质量。RTP 的 CoPs 由志愿一线医疗保健从业者领导和推动,他们确定和优先考虑关键质量问题,并选择相应的项目来进行。

方法和材料

对 RTP 的 CoPs 进行了评估,以评估它们在知识创造、知识转移和交流以及社区建设方面是否成功。该框架是基于疾病控制和预防中心 CoP 评估框架和工具制定的。使用前瞻性管理的成员调查(257 份调查)、出版物和半结构化访谈(18 名参与者)收集数据。

结果

共有 95%的参与者报告说 CoP 项目与他们的实践非常相关,50%的参与者报告说 CoP 参与导致他们的实践发生了变化。此外,90%的参与者报告说由于 CoPs,他们的专业网络有所扩大。总体而言,93%的参与者和 100%的受访者表示 CoPs 是一项有价值的举措。CoPs 面临的最大挑战是参与所需的时间承诺。

结论

这种成员驱动的 CoPs 方法应该在其他医疗保健环境中进行探索和建模,作为开发和共享知识以减少护理差异和提高放射治疗护理质量的一种手段。

相似文献

1
Improving Quality of Radiation Therapy Care Across Ontario using a Community-of-Practice Approach.利用实践社区方法改善安大略省的放射治疗护理质量。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Mar;9(2):e242-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
2
Communities of practice for supporting health systems change: a missed opportunity.支持卫生系统变革的实践社区:一个错失的机会。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Jul 25;13:33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0023-x.
3
Oncology communities of practice: insights from a qualitative analysis.肿瘤学实践社区:定性分析的见解
Curr Oncol. 2018 Dec;25(6):378-383. doi: 10.3747/co.25.4088. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
4
Collaborating with the Community: Improving Patient Access to Palliative Radiation Therapy.与社区合作:改善患者获得姑息性放射治疗的机会。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
5
Improving the quality of lung cancer care in Ontario: the lung cancer disease pathway initiative.提高安大略省肺癌护理质量:肺癌疾病路径倡议。
J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Jul;8(7):876-82. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31828cb548.
6
Improving the Quality of Radiation Treatment for Patients in Ontario: Increasing Peer Review Activities on a Jurisdictional Level Using a Change Management Approach.提高安大略省患者的放射治疗质量:采用变革管理方法在辖区层面增加同行评审活动。
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jan;12(1):81-2, e61-70. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.006882.
7
What's in a name? Tensions between formal and informal communities of practice among regional subspecialty cancer surgeons.名字里有什么?区域性癌症外科医师亚专科非正式与正式实践共同体之间的紧张关系。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Mar;23(1):95-113. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9776-z. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
8
Building an oncology community of practice to improve cancer care.建立肿瘤学实践社区以改善癌症护理。
Curr Oncol. 2018 Dec;25(6):371-377. doi: 10.3747/co.25.4087. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
9
Improving quality and performance in Ontario's cancer services: lessons for constructing a learning healthcare system.提高安大略省癌症服务的质量和绩效:构建学习型医疗体系的经验教训。
Healthc Q. 2015;17 Spec No:5-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2014.24002.
10
A realist evaluation of the role of communities of practice in changing healthcare practice.实践社区在改变医疗实践中的作用的实际评估。
Implement Sci. 2011 May 23;6:49. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-49.

引用本文的文献

1
The aims and effectiveness of communities of practice in healthcare: A systematic review.实践共同体在医疗保健中的目标和效果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 10;18(10):e0292343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292343. eCollection 2023.
2
Factors That Affect Knowledge-Sharing Behaviors in Medical Imaging Departments in Cancer Centers: Systematic Review.影响癌症中心医学影像科知识共享行为的因素:系统评价
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jul 12;10:e44327. doi: 10.2196/44327.
3
Implementation of Cardiac Stereotactic Radiotherapy: From Literature to the Linac.
心脏立体定向放射治疗的实施:从文献到直线加速器
Cureus. 2021 Feb 28;13(2):e13606. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13606.