School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Addison House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, England.
Physiotherapy Department, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, England.
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 17;7(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0870-y.
Stroke rehabilitation aims to optimise function and reduce complications post-stroke. Rehabilitation to optimise physical function post-stroke has beneficial effects for survivors of mild to moderate stroke. However, little is known about the effectiveness of interventions to rehabilitate physical function or manage immobility-related complications for survivors of severe stroke. The systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions on physical function and immobility-related complications in severe stroke and identify topics for future research in this area.
A systematic review of relevant electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, PEDro, DORIS and CENTRAL) between January 1987 and July 2017 will be undertaken to identify eligible published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any language. Ongoing RCTs will be identified by searching health-care trial registers (Stroke Trials Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov). Hand searches of identified study reference lists will also be performed. The PRISMA statement will be used to guide the systematic review. Two reviewers will screen search results, select studies using pre-defined selection criteria, extract data from and assess risk of bias for selected studies. Studies comparing the effect of one type of rehabilitation intervention to another or usual care on physical function and immobility-related complications for patients with severe stroke will be included. Studies may include participants with all levels of stroke severity but must provide sub-group analysis based on stroke severity. Studies will focus on any phase of the stroke rehabilitation pathway and will be grouped and analysed according to their timeframe post-stroke into acute and early sub-acute (up to 3 months post-stroke), early sub-acute to late sub-acute (from 3 to 6 months post-stroke) and chronic (greater than 6 months post-stroke). If sufficient studies demonstrate homogeneity, a meta-analysis will pool results of individual outcomes. The GRADE approach will be used to assess the evidence strength.
The results of this systematic review will summarise the strength of evidence for rehabilitation interventions used in the rehabilitation of physical function and immobility-related complications in severe stroke and identify gaps in evidence.
The systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)-registration number CRD77737 .
中风康复旨在优化功能并减少中风后的并发症。针对轻度至中度中风幸存者进行的康复治疗,对优化其身体功能具有有益的效果。然而,对于严重中风幸存者,针对身体功能康复或管理与活动受限相关的并发症的干预措施的有效性,我们知之甚少。本系统评价旨在评估严重中风患者的康复干预措施对身体功能和与活动受限相关并发症的有效性,并确定该领域未来研究的主题。
将对 1987 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月期间相关电子数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、AMED、PEDro、DORIS 和 CENTRAL)进行系统评价,以确定任何语言发表的合格随机对照试验(RCT)。将通过检索卫生保健试验登记处(中风试验登记处、ClinicalTrials.gov)来确定正在进行的 RCT。还将对手册中确定的研究参考列表进行手工检索。将使用 PRISMA 声明来指导系统评价。两名评审员将筛选搜索结果,使用预先定义的选择标准选择研究,从选定研究中提取数据并评估其偏倚风险。将纳入比较严重中风患者的一种康复干预与另一种干预或常规护理对身体功能和与活动受限相关并发症的影响的研究。研究可以包括不同严重程度的中风患者,但必须根据中风严重程度进行亚组分析。研究将关注中风康复路径的任何阶段,并根据其发病后时间分组和分析,分为急性和早期亚急性(中风后 3 个月内)、早期亚急性到晚期亚急性(中风后 3 至 6 个月)和慢性(中风后 6 个月以上)。如果有足够的研究显示出同质性,将对个别结果进行荟萃分析。将使用 GRADE 方法评估证据强度。
本系统评价的结果将总结在严重中风患者康复治疗中使用的康复干预措施的证据强度,并确定证据中的空白。
本系统评价已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记处(PROSPERO)进行了注册,登记号为 CRD77737。