• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者主导的决策:衡量加拿大产科护理中的自主权和尊重。

Patient-led decision making: Measuring autonomy and respect in Canadian maternity care.

机构信息

Birth Place Lab, Department of Family Practice and Midwifery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.

Birth Place Lab, Department of Family Practice and Midwifery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):586-594. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.023
PMID:30448044
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Changing Childbirth in British Columbia study explored women's preferences and experiences of maternity care, including women's role in decision-making.

METHODS

Following content validation by community members, we administered a cross-sectional online survey exploring novel topics, including drivers for interventions, and experiences of autonomy, respect, or mistreatment during maternity care. Using the Mothers Autonomy in Decision-Making (MADM) scale as an outcome measure in a mixed-effects analysis, we examined differential experiences by socio-demographic and prenatal risk profile, type of care provider, interventions received, and nature of communication with care providers.

RESULTS

A geographically representative sample of Canadian women (n = 2051) reported on 3400 pregnancies. Most women (95.2%) preferred to be the lead decision-maker during care. Patients of physicians had significantly lower autonomy (MADM) scores than midwifery clients as did women who felt pressured to accept interventions. Women who had a difference in opinion with their provider, and those who felt their provider seemed rushed reported the lowest MADM scores.

CONCLUSION

Women's autonomy is significantly altered by model of maternity care, the nature of interactions with care providers, and women's ability for self-determination.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

If health professionals acquire skills in person-centred decision-making experience of autonomy among pregnant women may improve.

摘要

目的

不列颠哥伦比亚省生育变化研究探索了女性对产妇护理的偏好和体验,包括女性在决策中的角色。

方法

在社区成员进行内容验证后,我们进行了一项横断面在线调查,探讨了新的主题,包括干预措施的驱动因素,以及在产妇护理期间自主性、尊重或虐待的体验。我们使用决策自主性量表(MADM)作为混合效应分析的结果衡量标准,根据社会人口统计学和产前风险状况、护理提供者类型、接受的干预措施以及与护理提供者的沟通性质,检查不同的体验。

结果

具有代表性的加拿大女性地理样本(n=2051)报告了 3400 次妊娠。大多数女性(95.2%)希望在护理期间成为主要决策者。与助产士客户相比,医生的患者自主(MADM)评分明显较低,感到有压力接受干预的女性也是如此。与提供者意见不同以及感到提供者似乎匆忙的女性报告的 MADM 评分最低。

结论

产妇护理模式、与护理提供者互动的性质以及女性的自我决定能力显著改变了女性的自主权。

实践意义

如果卫生专业人员掌握了以人为本的决策技能,孕妇的自主权体验可能会得到改善。

相似文献

1
Patient-led decision making: Measuring autonomy and respect in Canadian maternity care.患者主导的决策:衡量加拿大产科护理中的自主权和尊重。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):586-594. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
2
The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care.母亲决策自主权(MADM)量表:一种用于评估产妇护理体验的新工具的患者主导开发及心理测量测试
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0171804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171804. eCollection 2017.
3
Measuring respect and autonomy in Dutch maternity care: Applicability of two measures.测量荷兰产科护理中的尊重和自主权:两种测量方法的适用性。
Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):e447-e454. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
4
Assessing Dutch women's experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.评估荷兰女性的分娩经历:自主决策量表、尊重指数和生育体验问卷 2.0 的测量方法的调整和心理计量学评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04445-0.
5
Respectful maternity care and women's autonomy in decision making in Iceland: Application of scale instruments in a cross-sectional survey.冰岛的尊重产妇护理和妇女决策自主权:横断面调查中量表工具的应用。
Midwifery. 2023 Aug;123:103687. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103687. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
6
Providers' perceptions of communication and women's autonomy during childbirth: a mixed methods study in Kenya.提供者对分娩期间沟通和妇女自主权的看法:肯尼亚的一项混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 3;17(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0909-0.
7
Providers and women's perspectives on person-centered maternity care: a mixed methods study in Kenya.提供者和妇女对以人为中心的产时护理的看法:肯尼亚的一项混合方法研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 10;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0980-8.
8
Women's view on shared decision making and autonomy in childbirth: cohort study of Belgian women.女性对分娩中共享决策和自主权的看法:对比利时女性的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04890-x.
9
Service providers' experiences of disrespectful and abusive behavior towards women during facility based childbirth in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.服务提供者在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的医疗机构分娩过程中经历的针对妇女的不尊重和虐待行为。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0449-4.
10
Women's decision-making autonomy in Dutch maternity care.荷兰孕产妇护理中女性的决策自主权。
Birth. 2023 Jun;50(2):384-395. doi: 10.1111/birt.12674. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Informed Consent in Perinatal Care: Challenges and Best Practices in Obstetric and Midwifery-Led Models.围产期护理中的知情同意:产科和助产主导模式中的挑战与最佳实践
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(8):273. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15080273.
2
Barriers to informed consent in obstetric care during childbirth from practitioner's perspective: a qualitative study.从从业者角度看分娩期产科护理中知情同意的障碍:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):e101591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101591.
3
Experiences of Canadian perinatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of open-ended survey responses.
COVID-19大流行期间加拿大围产期护理经验:开放式调查回复分析
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251331696. doi: 10.1177/17455057251331696. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
4
Feasibility of a Community-Developed Survey Measuring Experiences of Pregnancy Care for LGBTQ2S+ Families.一项由社区开发的、用于衡量 LGBTQ2S+ 家庭孕期护理体验的调查的可行性。
Birth. 2025 Mar 11. doi: 10.1111/birt.12911.
5
A multi-level meta-analysis of the relationship between decision-making during birth and postpartum mental health.分娩期间决策与产后心理健康关系的多层次荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2025 Feb 4;13(1):2456032. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2025.2456032. eCollection 2025.
6
Disability justice and collective access to labour and delivery care: a qualitative study.残疾正义与分娩护理的集体可及性:一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07036-3.
7
Healthcare providers' experiences of maternity care service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: a follow-up systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.英国医疗服务提供者在新冠疫情期间提供产妇护理服务的经历:一项随访系统评价与定性证据综合分析
Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Nov 28;5:1470674. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1470674. eCollection 2024.
8
Childbirth Experience and Pain Control: Expectation, Satisfaction, and Analgesia Myths.分娩体验与疼痛控制:期望、满意度及镇痛误区
Cureus. 2024 Jun 25;16(6):e63082. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63082. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Attitudes Towards Non-directiveness Among Medical Geneticists in Germany and Switzerland.德国和瑞士医学遗传学家对非指导性的态度。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10355-x. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
10
Pregnant women autonomy when choosing their method of childbirth: Scoping review.孕妇在选择分娩方式时的自主权:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0304955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304955. eCollection 2024.