Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;278:84-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.11.027. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
In the VAL-SERVE (Valsartan in Systemic Right Ventricle) trial, three-year valsartan treatment improved systemic ventricular function only in symptomatic patients with congenitally or with an atrial switch corrected transposition of the great arteries. The aim of the current study was to investigate the longer-term clinical outcomes after valsartan treatment.
From 2006 to 2009, 88 adults were randomly allocated 1:1 to either valsartan or placebo for three consecutive years. Endpoints were defined as overall survival and freedom from clinical events (arrhythmia, heart failure, tricuspid valve surgery, death).
Cardiac drug use and median follow-up after trial close-out (8.3 years) was similar between the randomization groups. Six patients (valsartan n = 3, placebo n = 3) died in 364 and 365 person-years (P = 0.999). No difference in the composite or separate clinical endpoints was found between the randomization groups, with corresponding long-term event-free survival rates of 50% and 34%. Nevertheless, in symptomatic patients valsartan significantly reduced the risk for events compared to placebo (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.92). Analysis for repeated events and on-treatment analysis with any renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system-inhibitor did not alter these results.
Valsartan treatment in systemic RV patients did not result in improved survival at longer-term follow-up, but was associated with decreased risk of events in symptomatic patients.
在 VAL-SERVE(缬沙坦治疗系统性右心室)试验中,缬沙坦治疗 3 年仅改善了有症状的先天性或房间隔转换矫正大动脉转位患者的系统性心室功能。本研究的目的是探讨缬沙坦治疗后的长期临床结局。
2006 年至 2009 年,88 例成年人被随机分配 1:1 接受缬沙坦或安慰剂连续治疗 3 年。终点定义为总生存率和无临床事件(心律失常、心力衰竭、三尖瓣手术、死亡)。
心脏药物的使用和试验结束后的中位随访(8.3 年)在随机分组之间相似。6 例患者(缬沙坦组 n=3,安慰剂组 n=3)在 364 和 365 人年中死亡(P=0.999)。随机分组之间的复合或单独临床终点没有差异,相应的长期无事件生存率为 50%和 34%。然而,在有症状的患者中,缬沙坦与安慰剂相比显著降低了事件风险(HR 0.37,95%CI 0.17-0.92)。对重复事件的分析和任何肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂的治疗分析并没有改变这些结果。
在系统性 RV 患者中使用缬沙坦治疗并未在长期随访中改善生存率,但与有症状患者的事件风险降低相关。