Domen Andreas, Berzenji Lawek, Hendriks Jeroen M H, Yogeswaran Suresh Krishan, Lauwers Patrick, Van Meerbeeck Jan P, Van Schil Paul E
Department of Thoracic and Vascular surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium.
Division of Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Oct;7(5):550-555. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.07.07.
The optimal treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has not yet been established and is still under investigation. Surgery is one of the pillars in the multimodality approach with the purpose of removing as much as visible tumor as possible and to relieve symptoms. To date, two major surgical procedures are available for removal or debulking of MPM that is considered to be resectable: [extended (e)] pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) and extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). Historically, EPP was regarded as the only way to achieve a macroscopic complete resection. However, in the last years, there is a shift in literature towards (e)P/D as the preferred surgical procedure whenever possible as several retrospective studies and meta-analyses showed a similar or lower long-term survival and higher perioperative mortality and postoperative morbidity in patients who been treated with EPP. On the other hand, no randomized-controlled trials regarding surgical treatment with (e)P/D or EPP exist and therefore level A evidence favoring one surgical procedure is lacking. In this review we provide a nuanced and well-considered answer to the question whether EPP is still indicated in the surgical treatment of MPM.
恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)的最佳治疗方案尚未确定,仍在研究中。手术是多模式治疗方法的支柱之一,目的是尽可能切除可见肿瘤并缓解症状。迄今为止,有两种主要的手术方法可用于切除或减瘤被认为可切除的MPM:[扩大(e)]胸膜剥脱术/去皮质术(P/D)和胸膜外全肺切除术(EPP)。从历史上看,EPP被视为实现宏观完全切除的唯一方法。然而,在过去几年中,文献中出现了一种转变,即只要有可能,(e)P/D作为首选手术方法,因为多项回顾性研究和荟萃分析表明,接受EPP治疗的患者长期生存率相似或更低,围手术期死亡率和术后发病率更高。另一方面,尚无关于(e)P/D或EPP手术治疗的随机对照试验,因此缺乏支持一种手术方法的A级证据。在本综述中,我们对MPM手术治疗中是否仍应采用EPP这一问题提供了细致入微且经过深思熟虑的答案。