• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恶性胸膜间皮瘤根治性手术患者的合并症、术后发病率及生存率

Comorbidity, postoperative morbidity and survival in patients undergoing radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

作者信息

Infante Maurizio, Morenghi Emanuela, Bottoni Edoardo, Zucali Paolo, Rahal Daoud, Morlacchi Andrea, Ascolese Anna Maria, De Rose Fiorenza, Navarria Pierina, Crepaldi Alessandro, Testori Alberto, Voulaz Emanuele, Errico Valentina, Perrino Matteo, Scorsetti Marta, Chiti Arturo, Santoro Armando, Alloisio Marco

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Borgo Trento, Verona, Italy

Clinical Research Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Milan), Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Dec;50(6):1077-1082. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw215. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezw215
PMID:27330149
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined a series of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients who underwent radical surgery to explore relationships among comorbidity, postoperative morbidity and survival.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was carried out of all MPM patients operated on in a single centre from 2000 to 2015. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to classify patients according to their underlying condition. Postoperative complications were scored according to WHO-derived criteria. Survival comparisons were performed by Cox analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), 47 underwent pleurectomy decortication (PD) and 25 underwent palliative pleurectomy. The mean CCI of PD patients was significantly higher compared with that of EPP patients (P= 0.044). The frequency of grade 3+ complications was similar between EPP and PD (27 vs 26%). However, EPP patients had a 6-fold higher frequency of pleural sepsis (24 vs 4%, P= 0.002) occurring up to 695 days postoperatively. Median overall survival was 19 months (95% CI 13-25) after EPP, 30 months (95% CI 20-35) after PD and 13 months (95% CI 5-32) after palliative pleurectomy. At multivariate analysis, CCI (P< 0.001), histology (P= 0.014) and pleural sepsis (P= 0.001), but not complete resection, were significantly associated with survival. There was a trend in favour of PD over palliative resection after adjusting for histology and CCI.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCI is an independent predictor of survival in MPM patients undergoing radical surgery. Owing to its significant frequency and adverse impact, pleural sepsis may contribute to a reduced life expectancy after EPP. Surgical treatment of MPM remains debatable.

摘要

目的

我们研究了一系列接受根治性手术的恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)患者,以探讨合并症、术后发病率和生存率之间的关系。

方法

对2000年至2015年在单一中心接受手术的所有MPM患者进行回顾性分析。采用Charlson合并症指数(CCI)根据患者的基础疾病对其进行分类。术后并发症根据世界卫生组织制定的标准进行评分。通过Cox分析进行生存比较。

结果

91例患者接受了胸膜外全肺切除术(EPP),47例接受了胸膜剥脱术(PD),25例接受了姑息性胸膜切除术。PD患者的平均CCI显著高于EPP患者(P = 0.044)。EPP和PD患者3级及以上并发症的发生率相似(分别为27%和26%)。然而,EPP患者术后长达695天发生胸膜脓毒症的频率高出6倍(分别为24%和4%,P = 0.002)。EPP术后的中位总生存期为19个月(95%置信区间为第13 - 25个月),PD术后为30个月(95%置信区间为第20 - 35个月),姑息性胸膜切除术后为13个月(95%置信区间为第5 - 32个月)。在多变量分析中,CCI(P < 0.001)、组织学类型(P = 0.014)和胸膜脓毒症(P = 0.001),而非完全切除,与生存率显著相关。在调整组织学类型和CCI后,有证据表明PD优于姑息性切除术。

结论

CCI是接受根治性手术的MPM患者生存的独立预测因素。由于胸膜脓毒症的发生率较高且具有不良影响,它可能导致EPP后预期寿命缩短。MPM的手术治疗仍存在争议。

相似文献

1
Comorbidity, postoperative morbidity and survival in patients undergoing radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤根治性手术患者的合并症、术后发病率及生存率
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Dec;50(6):1077-1082. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw215. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
2
Is Pleurectomy/Decortication Superior to Extrapleural Pneumonectomy for Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma? A Single-Institutional Experience.对于恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者,胸膜切除术/纤维板剥脱术是否优于胸膜外全肺切除术?一项单机构经验。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Apr 20;24(2):81-88. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00192. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical treatments for malignant pleural mesothelioma.系统评价和荟萃分析手术治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤。
Lung Cancer. 2014 Feb;83(2):240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.11.026. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
4
Combined modality treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a single-centre long-term survival analysis using extrapleural pneumonectomy.恶性胸膜间皮瘤的联合治疗模式:采用胸膜外全肺切除术的单中心长期生存分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 May 1;55(5):934-941. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy385.
5
Radical pleurectomy and chemoradiation for malignant pleural mesothelioma: the outcome of incomplete resections.根治性胸膜切除术和放化疗治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤:不完全切除的结果。
Lung Cancer. 2013 Aug;81(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 17.
6
Systematic review of quality of life following pleurectomy decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.系统评价行胸膜剥脱肺切除术和胸膜外全肺切除术治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的生活质量。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):1188. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5064-4.
7
Updated meta-analysis of survival after extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication in mesothelioma.间皮瘤患者胸膜外肺切除术与胸膜切除术/纤维板剥脱术术后生存情况的最新荟萃分析。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Mar;67(3):312-320. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-1027-6. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
8
Extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication in the surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: results in 663 patients.胸膜外肺切除术与胸膜剥脱术/纤维板剥脱术治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的手术疗效:663例患者的结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Mar;135(3):620-6, 626.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.054. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
9
Adoption of pleurectomy and decortication for malignant mesothelioma leads to similar survival as extrapleural pneumonectomy.采用胸膜切除术和剥脱术治疗恶性间皮瘤的生存率与胸膜外全肺切除术相似。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Feb;151(2):478-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.121. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
10
Malignant pleural mesothelioma and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database: an analysis of surgical morbidity and mortality.恶性胸膜间皮瘤和胸外科医生协会数据库:手术发病率和死亡率分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jul;148(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Surgery in Pleural Mesothelioma.手术在胸膜间皮瘤中的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;16(9):1719. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091719.
2
Single-Center 20-Year Experience in Surgical Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.单中心20年恶性胸膜间皮瘤外科治疗经验
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 3;11(15):4537. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154537.
3
Efficacy of Intraoperative Hypertonic Glucose Solution Administration on Persistent Air Leak After Extended Pleurectomy/Decortication for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.
术中输注高渗葡萄糖溶液对恶性胸膜间皮瘤扩大性胸膜切除术/纤维板剥脱术后持续性漏气的疗效:一项回顾性病例对照研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;11:767791. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.767791. eCollection 2021.
4
Extended Pleurectomy/Decortication for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Humanitas's Experience.恶性胸膜间皮瘤的扩大胸膜切除术/去皮质术:Humanitas医院的经验
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 26;10(21):4968. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214968.
5
Landmark Trials in the Surgical Management of Mesothelioma.间皮瘤外科治疗的里程碑式试验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;28(4):2037-2047. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09589-5. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
6
Does size matter? -a population-based analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.大小很重要吗?——基于人群的恶性胸膜间皮瘤分析
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(4):1041-1052. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-19-488.
7
Should Lung-Sparing Surgery Be the Standard Procedure for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma?保留肺组织手术应成为恶性胸膜间皮瘤的标准手术方式吗?
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 8;9(7):2153. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072153.
8
The Construction and Analysis of ceRNA Network and Patterns of Immune Infiltration in Mesothelioma With Bone Metastasis.伴有骨转移的间皮瘤中ceRNA网络的构建与分析及免疫浸润模式
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Oct 18;7:257. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00257. eCollection 2019.
9
Prolonged post-recurrence survival following pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤行胸膜切除术/胸膜剥脱术后复发后的长期生存
Oncol Lett. 2019 Mar;17(3):3607-3614. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.9979. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
10
Extrapleural pneumonectomy: still indicated?胸膜外全肺切除术:仍有必要吗?
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Oct;7(5):550-555. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.07.07.