1 Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4all', University of Oldenburg, Germany.
2 Cognitive Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oldenburg, Germany.
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518809737. doi: 10.1177/2331216518809737.
The aim of this study was to compare elderly individuals who are hearing impaired but inexperienced in using hearing aids (hearing aid non-users; HA-NU) with their aided counterparts (hearing aid users; HA-U) across various auditory and non-auditory measures in order to identify differences that might be associated with the low hearing aid uptake rate. We have drawn data of 72 HA-NU and 139 HA-U with a mild-to-moderate hearing loss, and matched these two groups on the degree of hearing impairment, age, and sex. First, HA-NU and HA-U were compared across 65 auditory, cognitive, health-specific, and socioeconomic test measures as well as measures assessing technology commitment. Second, a logistic regression approach was performed to identify relevant predictors for using hearing aids. Finally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis for the matching approach. Group comparisons indicated that HA-NU perceive their hearing problem as less severe than their aided counterparts. Furthermore, HA-NU showed worse technology commitment and lower socioeconomic status than HA-U. The logistic regression revealed self-reported hearing performance, technology commitment, and the socioeconomic and health status as the most important predictors for using hearing aids.
本研究旨在比较有听力障碍但不熟悉使用助听器的老年人(助听器未使用者;HA-NU)和使用助听器的老年人(助听器使用者;HA-U)在各种听觉和非听觉测量方面的差异,以确定与助听器低使用率相关的差异。我们收集了 72 名 HA-NU 和 139 名轻度至中度听力损失的 HA-U 的数据,并根据听力损失程度、年龄和性别对这两组进行了匹配。首先,将 HA-NU 和 HA-U 进行了 65 项听觉、认知、特定健康和社会经济测试指标以及评估技术投入度的指标的比较。其次,采用逻辑回归方法确定使用助听器的相关预测因素。最后,我们对匹配方法进行了敏感性分析。组间比较表明,HA-NU 认为自己的听力问题比使用助听器的老年人轻。此外,HA-NU 的技术投入度和社会经济地位比 HA-U 低。逻辑回归显示,自我报告的听力表现、技术投入度以及社会经济和健康状况是使用助听器的最重要预测因素。