Suppr超能文献

氯胺酮、美托咪定和愈创甘油醚静脉麻醉与氯胺酮、美托咪定和咪达唑仑用于计算机断层扫描麻醉的幼马比较。

Total intravenous anaesthesia with ketamine, medetomidine and guaifenesin compared with ketamine, medetomidine and midazolam in young horses anaesthetised for computerised tomography.

机构信息

The School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia.

Centre Vétérinaire Rive Sud, Brossard, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Equine Vet J. 2019 Jul;51(4):510-516. doi: 10.1111/evj.13045. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no information directly comparing midazolam with guaifenesin when used in combination with an alpha-2 agonist and ketamine to maintain anaesthesia via i.v. infusion in horses.

OBJECTIVES

To compare ketamine-medetomidine-guaifenesin with ketamine-medetomidine-midazolam for total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in young horses anaesthetised for computerised tomography.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, blinded, crossover trial.

METHODS

Fourteen weanlings received medetomidine 7 μg/kg bwt i.v. and anaesthesia was induced with ketamine 2.2 mg/kg bwt i.v. On two separate occasions horses each received infusions of ketamine 3 mg/kg bwt/h, medetomidine 5 μg/kg bwt/h, guaifenesin 100 mg/kg bwt/h (KMG) or ketamine 3 mg/kg bwt/h, medetomidine 5 μg/kg bwt/h, midazolam 0.1 mg/kg bwt/h (KMM) for 50 min. Cardiorespiratory variables and anaesthetic depth were assessed every 5-10 min. Recovery times after the infusions ceased were recorded and recovery quality was assessed using a composite score system (CSS), simple descriptive scale (SDS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Multivariable models were used to generate mean recovery scores for each treatment and each recovery score system and provide P-values comparing treatment groups.

RESULTS

Anaesthesia was uneventful with no difference in additional anaesthetic requirements and little clinically relevant differences in cardiopulmonary variables between groups. All horses recovered without incident with no significant difference in recovery times. Quality of the anaesthetic recovery was significantly better for the KMM group compared with the KMG group using the CSS (P<0.001), SDS (P<0.001) and VAS (P<0.001).

MAIN LIMITATIONS

No surgical stimulus was applied and study animals may not represent general horse population.

CONCLUSION

Midazolam is a suitable alternative to guaifenesin when co-infused with ketamine and medetomidine for anaesthesia in young horses undergoing noninvasive procedures. Both infusions produce a clinically comparable quality of anaesthesia; however, recovery from anaesthesia is of a better quality following an infusion of ketamine-medetomidine-midazolam.

摘要

背景

尚无信息直接比较咪达唑仑和愈创甘油醚在与 α-2 激动剂和氯胺酮联合用于马匹静脉输注维持麻醉时的情况。

目的

比较氯胺酮-右美托咪定-愈创甘油醚与氯胺酮-右美托咪定-咪达唑仑用于计算机断层扫描的年轻马匹全身麻醉(TIVA)。

研究设计

前瞻性、随机、盲法、交叉试验。

方法

14 头断奶马静脉注射右美托咪定 7μg/kg bwt,静脉注射氯胺酮 2.2mg/kg bwt 诱导麻醉。在两个单独的场合,每匹马分别接受氯胺酮 3mg/kg bwt/h、右美托咪定 5μg/kg bwt/h、愈创甘油醚 100mg/kg bwt/h(KMG)或氯胺酮 3mg/kg bwt/h、右美托咪定 5μg/kg bwt/h、咪达唑仑 0.1mg/kg bwt/h(KMM)输注 50 分钟。每 5-10 分钟评估一次心肺变量和麻醉深度。记录输注停止后的恢复时间,并使用复合评分系统(CSS)、简单描述量表(SDS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估恢复质量。使用多变量模型为每个治疗组和每个恢复评分系统生成平均恢复评分,并提供比较治疗组的 P 值。

结果

麻醉过程平稳,各组之间无额外麻醉需求差异,心肺变量差异无临床意义。所有马匹均无意外恢复,恢复时间无显著差异。使用 CSS(P<0.001)、SDS(P<0.001)和 VAS(P<0.001),KMM 组的麻醉恢复质量明显优于 KMG 组。

主要局限性

未施加手术刺激,研究动物可能不能代表一般马群。

结论

在接受非侵入性手术的年轻马匹中,咪达唑仑可替代愈创甘油醚与氯胺酮和右美托咪定联合使用。两种输注均产生临床可比的麻醉质量;然而,在输注氯胺酮-右美托咪定-咪达唑仑后,麻醉恢复质量更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验