The School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia.
Centre Vétérinaire Rive Sud, Brossard, Quebec, Canada.
Equine Vet J. 2019 Jul;51(4):510-516. doi: 10.1111/evj.13045. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
There is no information directly comparing midazolam with guaifenesin when used in combination with an alpha-2 agonist and ketamine to maintain anaesthesia via i.v. infusion in horses.
To compare ketamine-medetomidine-guaifenesin with ketamine-medetomidine-midazolam for total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in young horses anaesthetised for computerised tomography.
Prospective, randomised, blinded, crossover trial.
Fourteen weanlings received medetomidine 7 μg/kg bwt i.v. and anaesthesia was induced with ketamine 2.2 mg/kg bwt i.v. On two separate occasions horses each received infusions of ketamine 3 mg/kg bwt/h, medetomidine 5 μg/kg bwt/h, guaifenesin 100 mg/kg bwt/h (KMG) or ketamine 3 mg/kg bwt/h, medetomidine 5 μg/kg bwt/h, midazolam 0.1 mg/kg bwt/h (KMM) for 50 min. Cardiorespiratory variables and anaesthetic depth were assessed every 5-10 min. Recovery times after the infusions ceased were recorded and recovery quality was assessed using a composite score system (CSS), simple descriptive scale (SDS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Multivariable models were used to generate mean recovery scores for each treatment and each recovery score system and provide P-values comparing treatment groups.
Anaesthesia was uneventful with no difference in additional anaesthetic requirements and little clinically relevant differences in cardiopulmonary variables between groups. All horses recovered without incident with no significant difference in recovery times. Quality of the anaesthetic recovery was significantly better for the KMM group compared with the KMG group using the CSS (P<0.001), SDS (P<0.001) and VAS (P<0.001).
No surgical stimulus was applied and study animals may not represent general horse population.
Midazolam is a suitable alternative to guaifenesin when co-infused with ketamine and medetomidine for anaesthesia in young horses undergoing noninvasive procedures. Both infusions produce a clinically comparable quality of anaesthesia; however, recovery from anaesthesia is of a better quality following an infusion of ketamine-medetomidine-midazolam.
尚无信息直接比较咪达唑仑和愈创甘油醚在与 α-2 激动剂和氯胺酮联合用于马匹静脉输注维持麻醉时的情况。
比较氯胺酮-右美托咪定-愈创甘油醚与氯胺酮-右美托咪定-咪达唑仑用于计算机断层扫描的年轻马匹全身麻醉(TIVA)。
前瞻性、随机、盲法、交叉试验。
14 头断奶马静脉注射右美托咪定 7μg/kg bwt,静脉注射氯胺酮 2.2mg/kg bwt 诱导麻醉。在两个单独的场合,每匹马分别接受氯胺酮 3mg/kg bwt/h、右美托咪定 5μg/kg bwt/h、愈创甘油醚 100mg/kg bwt/h(KMG)或氯胺酮 3mg/kg bwt/h、右美托咪定 5μg/kg bwt/h、咪达唑仑 0.1mg/kg bwt/h(KMM)输注 50 分钟。每 5-10 分钟评估一次心肺变量和麻醉深度。记录输注停止后的恢复时间,并使用复合评分系统(CSS)、简单描述量表(SDS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估恢复质量。使用多变量模型为每个治疗组和每个恢复评分系统生成平均恢复评分,并提供比较治疗组的 P 值。
麻醉过程平稳,各组之间无额外麻醉需求差异,心肺变量差异无临床意义。所有马匹均无意外恢复,恢复时间无显著差异。使用 CSS(P<0.001)、SDS(P<0.001)和 VAS(P<0.001),KMM 组的麻醉恢复质量明显优于 KMG 组。
未施加手术刺激,研究动物可能不能代表一般马群。
在接受非侵入性手术的年轻马匹中,咪达唑仑可替代愈创甘油醚与氯胺酮和右美托咪定联合使用。两种输注均产生临床可比的麻醉质量;然而,在输注氯胺酮-右美托咪定-咪达唑仑后,麻醉恢复质量更好。