From the Department of Translational Physiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Institut National de la Santé et de la Eecherche Médicale U1116, University of Lorraine, Vanoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France.
Anesth Analg. 2019 Aug;129(2):598-607. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003918.
Glycocalyx shedding after traumatic hemorrhagic or septic shock, as well as different resuscitation fluids, has been causally linked to increased vascular barrier permeability (VBP) resulting in tissue edema. In nontraumatic hemorrhagic shock (NTHS), it remains questionable whether glycocalyx degradation in itself results in an alteration of VBP. The composition of fluids can also have a modulatory effect on glycocalyx shedding and VBP. We hypothesized that the shedding of the glycocalyx during NTHS has little effect on VBP and that the composition of fluids can modulate these effects.
Fully instrumented Wistar-albino rats were subjected to a pressure-controlled NTHS (mean arterial pressure of 30 mm Hg) for 60 minutes. Animals were fluid resuscitated with Ringer's acetate, balanced hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solution, or 0.9% normal saline to a mean arterial pressure of 80 mm Hg and compared with shams or nonresuscitated NTHS. Glycocalyx shed products were determined at baseline and 60 minutes after fluid resuscitation. Skeletal muscle microcirculation was visualized using handheld vital microscopy. VBP changes were assessed using plasma decay of 3 fluorescent dyes (40- and 500-kDa dextran and 70-kDa albumin), Evans blue dye exclusion, intravital fluorescence microscopy, and determination of tissue edema (wet/dry weight ratio).
All glycocalyx shedding products were upgraded as a result of NTHS. Syndecan-1 significantly increased in NTHS (mean difference, -1668; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2336 to -1001; P < .0001), balanced crystalloid (mean difference, -964.2; 95% CI, -1492 to -436.4; P = .0001), and HES (mean difference, -1030; 95% CI, -1594 to -465.8; P = .0001) groups at the end of the experiment compared to baseline. Hyaluronan levels were higher at the end of the experiment in nonresuscitated NTHS (-923.1; 95% CI, -1216 to -630; P = .0001) and balanced crystalloid (-1039; 95% CI, -1332 to -745.5; P = .0001) or HES (-394.2; 95% CI, -670.1 to -118.3; P = .0027) groups compared to controls. Glycocalyx shedding resulted in microcirculation alterations as observed by handheld video microscopy. Total vessel density was altered in the normal saline (mean difference, 4.092; 95% CI, 0.6195-7.564; P = .016) and hemorrhagic shock (mean difference, 5.022; 95% CI, 1.55-8.495; P = .0024) groups compared to the control group, as well as the perfused vessel density and mean flow index. Despite degradation of endothelial glycocalyx, VBP as determined by 4 independent assays remained intact and continued to be so following fluid resuscitation.
NTHS induced glycocalyx shedding and microcirculation alterations, without altering VBP. Fluid resuscitation partially restored the microcirculation without altering VBP. These results challenge the concept that the glycocalyx barrier is a significant contributor to VBP.
创伤性失血性或感染性休克以及不同的复苏液会导致糖萼脱落,从而导致血管屏障通透性(VBP)增加,导致组织水肿。在非创伤性失血性休克(NTHS)中,糖萼降解本身是否会导致 VBP 改变仍存在疑问。液体的成分也会对糖萼脱落和 VBP 产生调节作用。我们假设,NTHS 期间糖萼的脱落对 VBP 的影响很小,并且液体的成分可以调节这些影响。
对完全仪器化的 Wistar 白化大鼠进行压力控制的 NTHS(平均动脉压为 30mmHg)60 分钟。动物用林格醋酸盐、平衡羟乙基淀粉(HES)溶液或 0.9%生理盐水复苏至平均动脉压 80mmHg,并与假手术或未复苏的 NTHS 进行比较。在复苏后 60 分钟时测定糖萼脱落产物。使用手持式活体显微镜观察骨骼肌微循环。通过 4 种荧光染料(40-和 500kDa 葡聚糖和 70kDa 白蛋白)、伊文思蓝染料排除、活体荧光显微镜和组织水肿(湿/干重比)评估 VBP 变化。
所有糖萼脱落产物均因 NTHS 而增加。NTHS 中 syndecan-1 显著增加(平均差异,-1668;95%置信区间[CI],-2336 至-1001;P<0.0001),平衡晶体(平均差异,-964.2;95%CI,-1492 至-436.4;P=0.0001)和 HES(平均差异,-1030;95%CI,-1594 至-465.8;P=0.0001)组在实验结束时与基线相比。与对照组相比,未复苏的 NTHS(-923.1;95%CI,-1216 至-630;P=0.0001)和平衡晶体(-1039;95%CI,-1332 至-745.5;P=0.0001)或 HES(-394.2;95%CI,-670.1 至-118.3;P=0.0027)组的透明质酸水平在实验结束时更高。糖萼脱落导致通过手持式视频显微镜观察到的微循环改变。生理盐水(平均差异,4.092;95%CI,0.6195-7.564;P=0.016)和出血性休克(平均差异,5.022;95%CI,1.55-8.495;P=0.0024)组的总血管密度与对照组相比发生了改变,以及灌注血管密度和平均血流指数。尽管内皮糖萼降解,但通过 4 种独立的测定方法确定的 VBP 仍然完整,并且在复苏后仍然如此。
NTHS 诱导糖萼脱落和微循环改变,而不改变 VBP。液体复苏部分恢复了微循环,而不改变 VBP。这些结果挑战了糖萼屏障是 VBP 的重要贡献者的概念。