Gates Deborah, Horner Victoria, Bradley Lindsey, Fogle Sheperd Takeya, John Omena, Higgins Melinda
Emory University Hospital.
Emory University.
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Dec 1;22(6):611-617. doi: 10.1188/18.CJON.611-617.
Accurate temperature measurement in patients with cancer is critical. Many patients are neutropenic; therefore, fever represents an oncologic emergency, and, in many cases, it can be the only indication of a life-threatening infection. Although oral thermometers most closely represent true core temperature, patients may have barriers to oral thermometry.
The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of two alternative, noninvasive thermometers (tympanic and temporal artery) by comparing them to an oral thermometer.
A method-comparison study design was used. Each participant received three temperature measurements. The dependent variable was the difference in temperature between the test thermometers and the oral thermometer.
The results suggest that neither of the test thermometers accurately represented core temperature, particularly in febrile patients. Both the tympanic and temporal artery thermometers became less accurate as oral temperature increased.
癌症患者的准确体温测量至关重要。许多患者存在中性粒细胞减少症;因此,发热代表肿瘤急症,而且在许多情况下,它可能是危及生命感染的唯一迹象。尽管口腔温度计最接近真实的核心体温,但患者进行口腔测温可能存在障碍。
本研究的目的是通过将两种替代性非侵入性温度计(鼓膜式和颞动脉式)与口腔温度计进行比较,评估其准确性。
采用方法比较研究设计。每位参与者接受三次体温测量。因变量是测试温度计与口腔温度计之间的温度差异。
结果表明,两种测试温度计均未准确反映核心体温,尤其是在发热患者中。随着口腔温度升高,鼓膜式和颞动脉式温度计的准确性均降低。