Suppr超能文献

一项随机、务实的、由药剂师主导的干预措施减少了骨科手术后的阿片类药物使用。

A randomized, pragmatic, pharmacist-led intervention reduced opioids following orthopedic surgery.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov;24(11):515-521.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a pharmacist-led, patient-directed intervention can reduce opioid use following total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized trial.

METHODS

Patients scheduled to undergo THA or TKA (during 2015 and 2016) were randomized to usual care or intervention. We ranked patients according to predicted risk of persistent opioid use and selected the top 60% for inclusion (n = 561); all contributed to the analysis. Intervention patients were mailed materials 2 weeks before and after surgery, plus they received telephone intervention from specially trained pharmacists if they filled opioid prescriptions in the 28 to 90 days following surgery. Our primary outcome was the dispensed morphine equivalents (DME) in the 90 days following surgery, modeled using a natural log transformation.

RESULTS

A total of 561 patients were randomized (286 usual care, 118 THA and 168 TKA; 275 intervention, 107 THA and 168 TKA); the mean age was 66 years, and 60% were female. Overall, we found no meaningful reduction in DME for intervention versus usual care (geometric mean ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.69-1.21]). However, there was effect modification by whether the patient had TKA or THA (interaction P <.01). Those undergoing THA in the intervention group used significantly less DME than did those undergoing THA in the usual care group (geometric mean ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.33-0.82]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our pharmacist-led, patient-directed intervention to reduce opioid use demonstrated a reduction in opioid dispensings in the 90 days following THA but not TKA.

摘要

目的

确定药剂师主导、患者导向的干预措施是否可以减少全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的阿片类药物使用。

研究设计

随机试验。

方法

计划接受 THA 或 TKA(2015 年和 2016 年期间)的患者被随机分配至常规护理或干预组。我们根据预测的持续使用阿片类药物的风险对患者进行排名,并选择前 60%的患者纳入(n=561);所有患者均参与分析。干预组患者在手术前 2 周和手术后邮寄材料,并且如果他们在手术后 28 至 90 天内开了阿片类药物处方,他们会接受特别培训的药剂师的电话干预。我们的主要结局是手术后 90 天内的分发吗啡当量(DME),采用自然对数转换进行建模。

结果

共有 561 名患者被随机分配(286 名常规护理,118 名 THA 和 168 名 TKA;275 名干预,107 名 THA 和 168 名 TKA);平均年龄为 66 岁,60%为女性。总体而言,我们没有发现干预组与常规护理组的 DME 有明显减少(几何均数比,0.92 [95%CI,0.69-1.21])。然而,是否进行 TKA 或 THA 存在效应修饰(交互 P<.01)。干预组中接受 THA 的患者的 DME 使用量明显少于常规护理组中接受 THA 的患者(几何均数比,0.52 [95%CI,0.33-0.82])。

结论

我们的药剂师主导、患者导向的干预措施旨在减少阿片类药物的使用,结果显示在 THA 后 90 天内减少了阿片类药物的配给,但在 TKA 后没有减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验