• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An Application of the Medical Research Council's Guidelines for Evaluating Complex Interventions: A Usability Study Assessing Smartphone-Connected Listening Devices in Adults With Hearing Loss.医学研究委员会评估复杂干预措施指南的应用:一项针对成年听力损失患者评估智能手机连接听力设备的可用性研究。
Am J Audiol. 2018 Nov 19;27(3S):474-481. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0019.
2
Applying the COM-B Model to Assess the Usability of Smartphone-Connected Listening Devices in Adults with Hearing Loss.应用COM-B模型评估成人听力损失患者使用智能手机连接听力设备的可用性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 May;30(5):417-430. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18061. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
3
Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids Enable and Empower Self-Management of Hearing Loss: A Qualitative Interview Study Underpinned by the Behavior Change Wheel.智能手机连接的助听器促进并增强听力损失的自我管理:一项基于行为改变轮的定性访谈研究
Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):921-932. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001143.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss.一项系统评价和荟萃分析,评估替代听力设备相对于传统助听器对成人听力损失患者的有效性。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Oct;57(10):721-729. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1493546.
5
A Qualitative Case Study of Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids: Influences on Patients, Clinicians, and Patient-Clinician Interactions.一项关于智能手机连接助听器的定性案例研究:对患者、临床医生及医患互动的影响
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Jun;28(6):506-521. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15153.
6
Effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids for adults with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol.替代听力设备对成人听力损失患者相对于传统助听器的有效性:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 27;6(10):e011683. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011683.
7
Argumentum ad Ignorantiam: Smartphone-Connected Listening Devices.诉诸无知:与智能手机连接的听力设备。
Semin Hear. 2020 Nov;41(4):254-265. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718711. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
8
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.改善成人听觉康复中助听器使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 12(7):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub2.
9
A Comparison of Personal Sound Amplification Products and Hearing Aids in Ecologically Relevant Test Environments.个人声音放大产品与助听器在生态相关测试环境中的比较
Am J Audiol. 2018 Dec 6;27(4):581-593. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-18-0027.
10
Do Hearing Aids Address Real-World Hearing Difficulties for Adults With Mild Hearing Impairment? Results From a Pilot Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.助听器能否解决轻度听力障碍成年人在实际生活中遇到的听力问题?使用生态瞬时评估的初步研究结果。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518783608. doi: 10.1177/2331216518783608.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding engagement with digital health interventions designed for adults with hearing loss and tinnitus: a mixed-method systematic review.了解针对听力损失和耳鸣成人设计的数字健康干预措施的参与情况:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf028.
2
Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping Review.评估可穿戴设备及其配套移动健康应用程序所使用的属性、方法和框架:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Apr 5;12:e52179. doi: 10.2196/52179.
3
Remote Technologies to Enhance Service Delivery for Adults: Clinical Research Perspectives.用于改善成人服务提供的远程技术:临床研究视角
Semin Hear. 2023 Jul 21;44(3):328-350. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769742. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
EHealth and Its Role in Supporting Audiological Rehabilitation: Patient Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators of Using a Personal Hearing Support System With Mobile Application as Part of the EVOTION Study.电子健康及其在支持听力学康复中的作用:EVOTION 研究中患者对使用带移动应用的个人听力支持系统作为康复一部分的障碍和促进因素的看法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;9:669727. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.669727. eCollection 2021.
5
Knowledge and Expectations of Hearing Aid Apps Among Smartphone Users and Hearing Professionals: Cross-sectional Survey.智能手机用户和听力专业人士对助听器应用程序的知识和期望:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 7;10(1):e27809. doi: 10.2196/27809.
6
SARS-CoV-2 and hearing: An audiometric analysis of COVID-19 hospitalized patients.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2与听力:对新冠肺炎住院患者的听力测定分析
J Otol. 2021 Jul;16(3):158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
7
Argumentum ad Ignorantiam: Smartphone-Connected Listening Devices.诉诸无知:与智能手机连接的听力设备。
Semin Hear. 2020 Nov;41(4):254-265. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718711. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
8
Are smartphone applications (App) useful to improve hearing?智能手机应用程序(App)对改善听力有用吗?
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2020 Aug;40(4):304-310. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0318. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
Evidence-Based Interventions for Adult Aural Rehabilitation: That Was Then, This Is Now.成人听力康复的循证干预:过去如此,现在亦然。
Semin Hear. 2019 Feb;40(1):68-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676784. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss.一项系统评价和荟萃分析,评估替代听力设备相对于传统助听器对成人听力损失患者的有效性。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Oct;57(10):721-729. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1493546.
2
Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid.自适配助听器的效果。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518768958. doi: 10.1177/2331216518768958.
3
A Data-Driven Synthesis of Research Evidence for Domains of Hearing Loss, as Reported by Adults With Hearing Loss and Their Communication Partners.基于听力损失成年人及其交流伙伴报告的研究证据的领域的数据分析综合。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517734088. doi: 10.1177/2331216517734088.
4
Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults.适用于成人轻至中度听力损失的助听器。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 25;9(9):CD012023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012023.pub2.
5
Personal Sound Amplification Products vs a Conventional Hearing Aid for Speech Understanding in Noise.个人声音放大产品与传统助听器在噪声环境下对言语理解的比较
JAMA. 2017 Jul 4;318(1):89-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6905.
6
Coping together with hearing loss: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the psychosocial experiences of people with hearing loss and their communication partners.共同应对听力损失:对听力损失者及其沟通伙伴心理社会经历的质性元分析
Int J Audiol. 2017 May;56(5):297-305. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1286695. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
7
A Qualitative Case Study of Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids: Influences on Patients, Clinicians, and Patient-Clinician Interactions.一项关于智能手机连接助听器的定性案例研究:对患者、临床医生及医患互动的影响
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Jun;28(6):506-521. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15153.
8
Cost as a Barrier for Hearing Aid Adoption.费用成为助听器采用的障碍。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jul 1;143(7):647-648. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0245.
9
The Effects of Service-Delivery Model and Purchase Price on Hearing-Aid Outcomes in Older Adults: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.服务提供模式和购买价格对老年人助听器使用效果的影响:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验
Am J Audiol. 2017 Mar 1;26(1):53-79. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0111.
10
What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About Hearing Aids.耳鼻喉科医生需要了解的关于助听器的知识。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Feb 1;143(2):109-110. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.3416.

医学研究委员会评估复杂干预措施指南的应用:一项针对成年听力损失患者评估智能手机连接听力设备的可用性研究。

An Application of the Medical Research Council's Guidelines for Evaluating Complex Interventions: A Usability Study Assessing Smartphone-Connected Listening Devices in Adults With Hearing Loss.

作者信息

Maidment David W, Ferguson Melanie

机构信息

National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom.

Hearing Sciences Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2018 Nov 19;27(3S):474-481. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0019.

DOI:10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0019
PMID:30452751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6437711/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to provide an example of the Medical Research Council's guidelines for evaluating complex health care interventions in the context of smartphone-connected listening devices in adults with hearing loss.

METHOD

Twenty existing hearing aid users trialed 1 of the following smartphone-connected listening devices: made-for-smartphone hearing aids, a personal sound amplification product, and a smartphone "hearing aid" application used with either wireless or wired earphones. Following 2 weeks of use in their everyday lives, participants completed self-report outcome measures.

RESULTS

Relative to conventional hearing aids, self-reported use, benefit, and satisfaction were higher, and residual disability was lower for made-for-smartphone hearing aids. The converse was found for the other smartphone-connected listening devices trialed. Similarly, overall usability was judged to be "above average" for the made-for-smartphone hearing aids, but "below average" for the remaining devices.

CONCLUSIONS

This developmental work, guided by the Medical Research Council's framework, lays the foundation for feasibility and pilot studies, leading to high-quality research assessing the effectiveness of smartphone-connected listening devices. This future evidence is necessary to guide health care commissioners and policymakers when considering new service delivery models for adults living with hearing loss.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在提供一个在成年听力损失患者中,关于医学研究理事会评估复杂医疗保健干预措施指南的实例,该指南适用于与智能手机连接的听力设备。

方法

20名现有的助听器使用者试用了以下与智能手机连接的听力设备之一:专为智能手机设计的助听器、个人声音放大产品,以及与无线或有线耳机配合使用的智能手机“助听器”应用程序。在日常生活中使用两周后,参与者完成了自我报告结局测量。

结果

与传统助听器相比,专为智能手机设计的助听器在自我报告的使用、益处和满意度方面更高,而残余残疾更低。对于试用的其他与智能手机连接的听力设备,结果则相反。同样,专为智能手机设计的助听器的总体可用性被判定为“高于平均水平”,而其余设备的总体可用性被判定为“低于平均水平”。

结论

这项在医学研究理事会框架指导下开展的开发工作,为可行性研究和试点研究奠定了基础,从而开展高质量研究以评估与智能手机连接的听力设备的有效性。这种未来的证据对于指导医疗保健专员和政策制定者在考虑为成年听力损失患者提供新的服务提供模式时是必要的。