• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Findings and Ethical Considerations From a Thematic Analysis of Threads Within Tinnitus Online Support Groups.耳鸣在线支持小组主题分析的结果与伦理考量
Am J Audiol. 2018 Nov 19;27(3S):503-512. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0013.
2
Most Patients With Bone Sarcomas Seek Emotional Support and Information About Other Patients' Experiences: A Thematic Analysis.大多数骨肉瘤患者寻求情感支持和其他患者经验的信息:主题分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):161-171. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002761. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Investigating How Bowel Cancer Survivors Discuss Exercise and Physical Activity Within Web-Based Discussion Forums: Qualitative Analysis.探究肠癌幸存者如何在基于网络的讨论论坛中讨论运动与身体活动:定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 16;21(12):e13929. doi: 10.2196/13929.
4
Sharing and Empathy in Digital Spaces: Qualitative Study of Online Health Forums for Breast Cancer and Motor Neuron Disease (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis).数字空间中的分享与同理心:乳腺癌和运动神经元病(肌萎缩侧索硬化症)在线健康论坛的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 14;20(6):e222. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9709.
5
Prevention of HIV and Other Sexually Transmissible Infections in Expatriates and Traveler Networks: Qualitative Study of Peer Interaction in an Online Forum.预防外派人员和旅行者群体中的艾滋病毒及其他性传播感染:在线论坛中同伴互动的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 5;20(9):e10787. doi: 10.2196/10787.
6
The Use of Online Health Forums by Patients With Chronic Cough: Qualitative Study.慢性咳嗽患者对在线健康论坛的使用:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 24;20(1):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7975.
7
'I found it the only place that spoke the same language': a thematic analysis of messages posted to an online peer support discussion forum for people living with dementia.“我发现这里是唯一能让我找到共鸣的地方”:对一个面向痴呆症患者的在线同伴支持讨论论坛上所发布信息的主题分析
Age Ageing. 2023 Jan 8;52(1). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac330.
8
Online forum users' views and experiences of managing irritable bowel syndrome: a qualitative analysis of discussion content.在线论坛用户对肠易激综合征管理的看法和经验:讨论内容的定性分析
BJGP Open. 2020 Dec 15;4(5). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101084. Print 2020 Dec.
9
Eliciting and receiving online support: using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support.引出并接受在线支持:使用计算机辅助内容分析来审视在线社会支持的动态变化。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 20;17(4):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3558.
10
Exploring the Experiences and Perspectives of Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes via Web-Based UK Diabetes Health Forums: Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Threads.通过英国糖尿病健康在线论坛探索2型糖尿病胰岛素治疗的经验与观点:主题帖的定性主题分析
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Oct 5;7(4):e34650. doi: 10.2196/34650.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing a Comprehensive Tinnitus Care Pathway-Part 1: Essential Components.建立全面的耳鸣护理路径——第1部分:基本组成部分。
Semin Hear. 2025 Mar 5;45(3-04):284-295. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1804519. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Prenatal alcohol exposure before pregnancy awareness: a thematic analysis of online forum comments and misinformation.怀孕意识形成前的产前酒精暴露:对在线论坛评论及错误信息的主题分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 19;13:1525004. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1525004. eCollection 2025.
3
Exploring Social Support in an Online Support Community for Tourette Syndrome and Tic Disorders: Analysis of Postings.探索图雷特综合征和抽动障碍在线支持社区中的社会支持:发帖分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 4;24(10):e34403. doi: 10.2196/34403.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Is Tinnitus a Problem? A Qualitative Analysis of Problems Reported by Tinnitus Patients.为什么耳鸣是一个问题?耳鸣患者报告问题的定性分析。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518812250. doi: 10.1177/2331216518812250.
2
Development and technical functionality of an Internet-based intervention for tinnitus in the UK.英国一种基于互联网的耳鸣干预措施的开发与技术功能
Internet Interv. 2016 Aug 14;6:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.08.002. eCollection 2016 Nov.
3
Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users' Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation.构建社会研究中发布推特数据的伦理框架:兼顾用户观点、网络环境及算法评估
Sociology. 2017 Dec;51(6):1149-1168. doi: 10.1177/0038038517708140. Epub 2017 May 26.
4
Different Teams, Same Conclusions? A Systematic Review of Existing Clinical Guidelines for the Assessment and Treatment of Tinnitus in Adults.不同团队,结论相同?关于成人耳鸣评估与治疗的现有临床指南的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 22;8:206. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00206. eCollection 2017.
5
A systematic review of techniques and effects of self-help interventions for tinnitus: Application of taxonomies from health psychology.耳鸣自助干预技术与效果的系统评价:健康心理学分类法的应用
Int J Audiol. 2016 Jul;55 Suppl 3:S79-89. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1137363. Epub 2016 May 5.
6
The Pros and Cons of Getting Engaged in an Online Social Community Embedded Within Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: Survey Among Users.参与数字认知行为疗法失眠在线社交社区的利弊:用户调查
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 25;18(4):e88. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5654.
7
The Application of Intervention Coding Methodology to Describe the Tinnitus E-Programme, an Internet-Delivered Self-Help Intervention for Tinnitus.干预编码方法在描述耳鸣电子程序中的应用,该程序是一种通过互联网提供的耳鸣自助干预措施。
Am J Audiol. 2015 Sep;24(3):311-5. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0089.
8
Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with tinnitus in the UK: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.英国针对成年耳鸣患者的基于互联网的认知行为疗法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 23;5(9):e008241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008241.
9
An online monogenic diabetes discussion group: supporting families and fueling new research.一个在线单基因糖尿病讨论小组:支持家庭并推动新研究。
Transl Res. 2015 Nov;166(5):425-31. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
10
Seasonal affective disorder in patients with chronic tinnitus.慢性耳鸣患者的季节性情感障碍
Laryngoscope. 2016 Feb;126(2):447-51. doi: 10.1002/lary.25446. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

耳鸣在线支持小组主题分析的结果与伦理考量

Findings and Ethical Considerations From a Thematic Analysis of Threads Within Tinnitus Online Support Groups.

作者信息

Ainscough Eve, Smith Sandra N, Greenwell Kate, Hoare Derek J

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2018 Nov 19;27(3S):503-512. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0013.

DOI:10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0013
PMID:30452754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6437712/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Tinnitus is the perception of noise without a corresponding external stimulus. Current management typically aims to moderate associated psychosocial stressors and allow sufferers to retain an adequate quality of life. With the increasing recognition of the Internet as a repository for health advice, information, and support, the online support group has become a popular coping strategy for those living with chronic conditions such as tinnitus. Patients find that communicating with each other, providing encouragement, and sharing information in the absence of physical and temporal boundaries are invaluable ways of managing their condition. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential positive and negative consequences of participating in online support groups for tinnitus.

METHOD

Discussion forum threads were collated from across 4 public online support group websites. All threads were initiated between February and April 2016. Texts from these threads were coded by 3 separate analysts using both inductive and deductive thematic analysis, until data saturation was reached.

RESULTS

Analysis of 75 threads (641 individual posts) found 9 independent themes pertaining to aspects of participation in tinnitus online support groups. The results revealed that using the forums allowed users to exchange knowledge and experiences, express complex emotions, profit from a network of support, and engage in everyday conversation away from the burden of their tinnitus. However, some experiences appeared to be compromised by negative messages, limited communication, and informational issues such as conflicting advice or information overload.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the 1st research into discussion forums in tinnitus online support groups. A nonintrusive (passive) analysis method was used, whereby messages comprising the dataset were retrieved without direct interaction with the discussion forum. Individuals and the community of tinnitus online support groups are deemed to be at low risk from potential harm in this study. Most tinnitus patients likely benefit from accessing online support groups, for example, they discover they are not alone, and they find new coping strategies. However, for those who are particularly vulnerable or prone to psychological stress, accessing these groups could be detrimental.

摘要

目的

耳鸣是在没有相应外部刺激的情况下对噪声的感知。当前的治疗通常旨在缓解相关的心理社会压力源,并使患者保持足够的生活质量。随着互联网作为健康建议、信息和支持的存储库越来越受到认可,在线支持小组已成为耳鸣等慢性病患者常用的应对策略。患者发现,在没有物理和时间限制的情况下相互交流、给予鼓励和分享信息是管理自身病情的宝贵方式。本研究的目的是探讨参与耳鸣在线支持小组可能产生的积极和消极后果。

方法

从4个公共在线支持小组网站收集讨论论坛帖子。所有帖子均在2016年2月至4月期间发起。这些帖子的文本由3名独立分析人员使用归纳和演绎主题分析进行编码,直至达到数据饱和。

结果

对75个帖子(641个单独帖子)的分析发现了9个与参与耳鸣在线支持小组相关的独立主题。结果显示,使用论坛使用户能够交流知识和经验、表达复杂情感、从支持网络中受益,并在远离耳鸣负担的情况下进行日常对话。然而,一些体验似乎受到负面信息、有限沟通以及相互矛盾的建议或信息过载等信息问题的影响。

结论

本研究是对耳鸣在线支持小组讨论论坛的首次研究。采用了一种非侵入性(被动)分析方法,即无需与讨论论坛直接互动即可检索构成数据集的消息。在本研究中,耳鸣在线支持小组的个人和社区被认为受到潜在危害的风险较低。大多数耳鸣患者可能会从访问在线支持小组中受益,例如,他们发现自己并不孤单,并找到了新的应对策略。然而,对于那些特别脆弱或容易产生心理压力的人来说,访问这些小组可能会有害。