• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺癌术前临床生理检查结果的早期复发预测因素

Predictive Early Recurrence Factors of Preoperative Clinicophysiological Findings in Pancreatic Cancer.

作者信息

Suzuki Shuji, Shimoda Mitsugi, Shimazaki Jiro, Maruyama Tsunehiko, Oshiro Yukio, Nishida Kiyotaka, Sahara Yatsuka, Nagakawa Yuichi, Tsuchida Akihiko

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ibaraki Medical Center, Tokyo Medical University, Ibaraki, Japan,

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ibaraki Medical Center, Tokyo Medical University, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Surg Res. 2018;59(5-6):329-338. doi: 10.1159/000494382. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1159/000494382
PMID:30453288
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the use of preoperative clinicophysiological parameters as predictive risk factors for early recurrence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after curative resection.

METHODS

A total of 260 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for PDAC between 2007 and 2015 were examined retrospectively. We divided the patients into those with early recurrence (within 6 months; group A, n = 52) and those with relapse within ≥6 months or without recurrence (group B, n = 208). Data regarding clinicophysiological parameters were analyzed as predictors of disease-free survival (DFS). These factors were analyzed by χ2 tests on univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazard models on multivariate analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Groups A and B had significantly different preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and curability. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that CA19-9 and CEA were independent prognostic factors for early recurrence. Patients with CA19-9 levels > 124.65 U/mL had significantly shorter DFS than those with lower levels, as did patients with CEA levels > 4.45 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that elevated CA19-9 (> 124.65 U/mL) and CEA (> 4.45 ng/mL) were independent predictors of early recurrence after pancreatic resection in PDAC patients.

摘要

背景

我们旨在评估术前临床生理参数作为胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)根治性切除术后早期复发的预测风险因素的作用。

方法

回顾性研究了2007年至2015年间260例行PDAC胰腺切除术的患者。我们将患者分为早期复发组(6个月内;A组,n = 52)和复发时间≥6个月或未复发组(B组,n = 208)。分析临床生理参数数据作为无病生存期(DFS)的预测指标。这些因素在单因素分析中通过χ2检验进行分析,在多因素分析中通过Cox比例风险模型进行分析。使用对数秩检验生成Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。

结果

A组和B组术前糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)水平、癌胚抗原(CEA)水平和可切除性有显著差异。单因素和多因素分析表明,CA19-9和CEA是早期复发的独立预后因素。CA19-9水平> 124.65 U/mL的患者DFS明显短于水平较低的患者,CEA水平> 4.45 ng/mL的患者也是如此。

结论

我们的结果表明,CA19-9(> 124.65 U/mL)和CEA(> 4.45 ng/mL)升高是PDAC患者胰腺切除术后早期复发的独立预测因素。

相似文献

1
Predictive Early Recurrence Factors of Preoperative Clinicophysiological Findings in Pancreatic Cancer.胰腺癌术前临床生理检查结果的早期复发预测因素
Eur Surg Res. 2018;59(5-6):329-338. doi: 10.1159/000494382. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
2
Preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 are prognostic markers for survival after curative resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas - a retrospective tumor marker prognostic study.术前 CEA 和 CA 19-9 是可切除性胰腺导管腺癌患者生存的预后标志物——一项回顾性肿瘤标志物预后研究。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(10):1067-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
3
Normalization of CA19-9 following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is not tantamount to being cured?胰腺导管腺癌切除术后CA19-9恢复正常并不等同于治愈?
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(2):661-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.2.661.
4
Postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen as a complementary tumor marker of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.术后癌胚抗原作为胰腺导管腺癌中糖类抗原19-9的补充肿瘤标志物。
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Mar;30(3):259-63. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.3.259. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
5
Serum SPan-1 Is a Significant Risk Factor for Early Recurrence of Pancreatic Cancer after Curative Resection.血清SPan-1是胰腺癌根治性切除术后早期复发的重要危险因素。
Dig Surg. 2017;34(2):125-132. doi: 10.1159/000449041. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
6
Postoperative serum CEA and CA125 levels are supplementary to perioperative CA19-9 levels in predicting operative outcomes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.术后血清癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原125(CA125)水平在预测胰腺导管腺癌手术结果方面对围手术期糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)水平具有补充作用。
Surgery. 2017 Feb;161(2):373-384. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
7
CA19-9 on Postoperative Surveillance in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Predicting Recurrence and Changing Prognosis over Time.CA19-9 用于监测胰腺导管腺癌术后情况:预测复发并随时间改变预后。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3483-3491. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6521-7. Epub 2018 May 21.
8
Elevated serum CA19-9 level is a promising predictor for poor prognosis in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study.血清CA19-9水平升高是可切除性胰腺导管腺癌患者预后不良的一个有前景的预测指标:一项初步研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun 2;12:171. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-171.
9
Prognostic impact of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in stage IV colorectal cancer patients after R0 resection.癌胚抗原和糖类抗原19-9对IV期结直肠癌患者R0切除术后的预后影响
J Surg Res. 2016 Oct;205(2):384-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.078. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
10
Serum Marker Score Based on Prognostic Nutrition Index, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Is Associated With Recurrence for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.基于预后营养指数、癌胚抗原和糖类抗原19-9的血清标志物评分与接受胰腺导管腺癌手术患者的复发相关。
Pancreas. 2018 Oct;47(9):1130-1134. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001146.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative prediction for early recurrence in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: combining radiomics and abdominal fat analysis.胰腺导管腺癌患者早期复发的术前预测:结合影像组学与腹部脂肪分析
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01773-3.
2
A risk score system including CT features for predicting early recurrence of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection: a dual-center retrospective study.一种包含CT特征的风险评分系统用于预测可切除胰腺导管腺癌根治性切除术后的早期复发:一项双中心回顾性研究
Eur Radiol. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11632-y.
3
A CT-based radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of perineural invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
一种基于CT的影像组学列线图用于术前预测胰腺导管腺癌的神经周围侵犯
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 4;15:1525835. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1525835. eCollection 2025.
4
Defining and Predicting Early Recurrence for Optimal Treatment Strategies for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Derived Pancreatic Cancer: An International Multicenter Study.导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤衍生胰腺癌的最佳治疗策略:早期复发的定义与预测——一项国际多中心研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1879-1886. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16649-z. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
5
Molecular pathology and protein markers for pancreatic cancer: relevance in staging, in adjuvant therapy, in determination of minimal residual disease, and follow-up.胰腺癌的分子病理学与蛋白质标志物:在分期、辅助治疗、微小残留病的确定及随访中的相关性
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):56-70. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-22-628. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
6
Identifying Effective Biomarkers for Accurate Pancreatic Cancer Prognosis Using Statistical Machine Learning.使用统计机器学习识别有效的生物标志物以准确预测胰腺癌预后
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;13(19):3091. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193091.
7
Identification of CEACAM5 as a stemness-related inhibitory immune checkpoint in pancreatic cancer.鉴定 CEACAM5 为胰腺癌中与干性相关的抑制性免疫检查点。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 9;22(1):1291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10397-7.
8
Molecular Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using a Next-Generation Sequencing Custom-Designed Multigene Panel.使用定制设计的二代测序多基因检测板对胰腺导管腺癌进行分子特征分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 23;12(5):1058. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051058.
9
Circulating Nucleic Acids as Novel Biomarkers for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.循环核酸作为胰腺导管腺癌的新型生物标志物
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 17;14(8):2027. doi: 10.3390/cancers14082027.
10
Preoperative recurrence prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection using radiomics of diagnostic computed tomography.使用诊断性计算机断层扫描的影像组学对胰腺导管腺癌根治性切除术后的术前复发进行预测
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Dec 3;43:101215. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101215. eCollection 2022 Jan.