Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of AIDS Control and Prevention, Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):1268. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6128-8.
Timely monitoring HIV epidemic among key populations is a formidable challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between data collected from an enhanced HIV sentinel surveillance (HSS+) and an HIV service, and to discuss whether testing service data can be used for surveillance purposes.
The HSS+ data were collected from HIV sentinel surveillance conducted annually among men who have sex with men (MSM) between 2009 and 2013 in Guangzhou, China. The HIV service data were obtained from the China-Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Cooperation Program on HIV Prevention and Care (China-Gates HIV Program) in Guangzhou during the same period. The China-Gates HIV Program aimed to increase HIV counseling and testing among MSM. We compared demographic characteristics, condom use, HIV testing history, and the HIV status among individuals in these two datasets. The Armitage-trend test was used to evaluate the HIV epidemic and behaviors of the participants in the two datasets over the study period.
Overall, a total of 2224 and 5311 MSM were included in the surveillance and service datasets, respectively. The majority of participants in the two datasets were between 20 and 29 years old, at least attended college, and had never been married. However, socio-demographic characteristics varied slightly between the two datasets. Similar trends were observed for the HIV epidemic in these two datasets. The surveillance dataset indicated that HIV prevalence increased from 3.9% in 2009 to 11.4% in 2013 (P-value for trend < 0.001), while data from the HIV service dataset indicated that MSM HIV prevalence during this same period increased from 6.2 to 8.9% (P-value for trend = 0.025). The rates of condom use were similar between the two datasets and remained consistent throughout the study period.
HIV service data can complement existing HIV surveillance systems for MSM in China, though it may underestimate the HIV prevalence (HSS+ data contains people whose status is already know, while service data contains people who were initially negative or people of unknown status). HIV service data can be used for surveillance purposes, when prerequisite variables are collected from a large number people, if the quality assessment is conducted.
及时监测重点人群中的 HIV 流行情况是一项艰巨的挑战。本研究旨在评估从强化 HIV 哨点监测(HSS+)和 HIV 服务中收集的数据之间的一致性,并讨论是否可以使用检测服务数据进行监测。
HSS+数据是从 2009 年至 2013 年在中国广州每年对男男性行为者(MSM)进行的 HIV 哨点监测中收集的。同期,从中国-比尔和梅琳达盖茨基金会合作项目(中国盖茨艾滋病项目)的 HIV 服务数据中获得 HIV 服务数据。中国盖茨艾滋病项目旨在增加 MSM 中的 HIV 咨询和检测。我们比较了这两个数据集的个体的人口统计学特征、 condom 使用、HIV 检测史和 HIV 状况。使用 Armitage 趋势检验评估两个数据集在研究期间参与者的 HIV 流行情况和行为。
总体而言,哨点监测和服务数据集分别纳入了 2224 名和 5311 名 MSM。两个数据集的大多数参与者年龄在 20 至 29 岁之间,至少受过大学教育,从未结婚。然而,两个数据集之间的社会人口统计学特征略有不同。两个数据集的 HIV 流行趋势相似。哨点监测数据表明,HIV 流行率从 2009 年的 3.9%上升到 2013 年的 11.4%(趋势 P 值<0.001),而同期 HIV 服务数据表明,在此期间,MSM 的 HIV 流行率从 6.2%上升到 8.9%(趋势 P 值=0.025)。两个数据集的 condom 使用率相似,且在整个研究期间保持一致。
HIV 服务数据可以补充中国针对 MSM 的现有 HIV 监测系统,尽管它可能低估了 HIV 流行率(HSS+ 数据包含已经知道其状况的人,而服务数据包含最初呈阴性或状况未知的人)。当从大量人群中收集到前提变量并进行质量评估时,HIV 服务数据可用于监测目的。