Department of Nephrology, Sunshine Coast Clinical School, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland; The University of Queensland, Sunshine Coast Clinical School, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland.
The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Concord and Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Mar;73(3):332-343. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Dialysis is a burdensome and complex treatment for which many recipients require support from caregivers. The impact of caring for people dependent on dialysis on the quality of life of the caregivers has been incompletely characterized.
Systematic review of quantitative studies of quality of life and burden to caregivers.
SETTING & STUDY POPULATION: Caregivers of adults receiving maintenance dialysis.
The Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, and MEDLINE were systematically searched from inception until December 2016 for quantitative studies of caregivers. Pediatric and non-English language studies were excluded. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
2 independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data using a prespecified extraction instrument.
Descriptive reports of demographics, measurement scales, and outcomes. Quantitative meta-analysis using random effects when possible.
61 studies were identified that included 5,367 caregivers from 21 countries and assessed the impact on caregivers using 70 different scales. Most (85%) studies were cross-sectional. The largest identified group of caregivers was female spouses who cared for recipients of facility-based hemodialysis (72.3%) or peritoneal dialysis (20.6%). Caregiver quality of life was poorer than in the general population, mostly comparable with caregivers of people with other chronic diseases, and often better than experienced by the dialysis patients cared for. Caregiver quality of life was comparable across dialysis modalities.
Heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures made comparisons between studies difficult and precluded quantitative meta-analysis. Study quality was generally poor.
Quality of life of caregivers of dialysis recipients is poorer than in the general population and comparable to that of caregivers of individuals with other chronic diseases. The impact of caring for recipients of home hemodialysis or changes in the impact of caring over time have not been well studied. Further research is needed to optimally inform dialysis programs how to educate and support caregivers.
透析是一种负担沉重且复杂的治疗方法,许多接受透析治疗的患者都需要护理人员的支持。然而,目前尚未完全了解照顾依赖透析的患者对护理人员生活质量的影响。
对有关透析患者护理人员生活质量和负担的定量研究进行系统综述。
接受维持性透析治疗的成年患者的护理人员。
系统检索了从建库至 2016 年 12 月的 Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、PubMed 和 MEDLINE 中有关护理人员的定量研究,排除了儿科和非英语语言的研究。使用改良的 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表评估研究质量。
2 名独立的综述作者使用预先指定的提取工具选择研究并提取数据。
描述性报告人口统计学特征、测量量表和结果。在可能的情况下,采用随机效应进行定量荟萃分析。
共确定了 61 项研究,纳入了来自 21 个国家的 5367 名护理人员,使用 70 种不同的量表评估了对护理人员的影响。大多数(85%)研究为横断面研究。最大的护理人员群体是女性配偶,她们照顾接受机构内血液透析(72.3%)或腹膜透析(20.6%)的患者。护理人员的生活质量比一般人群差,与照顾其他慢性病患者的护理人员的生活质量大致相当,且通常优于所照顾的透析患者。不同透析方式的护理人员生活质量相当。
研究设计和结局测量指标的异质性使得难以进行研究间比较,也无法进行定量荟萃分析。研究质量普遍较差。
透析患者护理人员的生活质量比一般人群差,与照顾其他慢性病患者的护理人员的生活质量相当。家庭血液透析患者的照顾情况以及随着时间推移照顾影响的变化尚未得到充分研究。需要进一步研究,以便为透析项目提供最佳信息,以告知其如何教育和支持护理人员。