Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Nov;62(5):953-73. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.03.022. Epub 2013 May 29.
A comprehensive assessment of the association of patients' renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality with their participation in life activities (physical function, travel, recreation, freedom, and work) is needed.
Systematic review of peer-reviewed published studies.
SETTING & POPULATION: Adults undergoing RRT (hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or transplantation).
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from January 1980 through April 2012 for English-language articles that compared participation in life activities among patients receiving: (1) hemodialysis compared with peritoneal dialysis, (2) hemodialysis compared with kidney transplantation, or (3) peritoneal dialysis compared with kidney transplantation.
RRT modality.
Reported rates of physical function, travel, recreation, freedom, and work-related activities by RRT modality.
46 studies (6 prospective cohort, 38 cross-sectional, and 2 pre-post transplantation) provided relevant comparisons of life participation activities among patients treated with hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Studies were conducted in 1985-2011 among diverse patient populations in 16 distinct locations. A majority of studies reported greater life participation rates for patients with kidney transplants compared with patients receiving either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. In contrast, a majority of studies reported no differences in outcomes between patients receiving hemodialysis and patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. These results were consistent throughout the study period, across diverse populations, and among the subset of studies that performed appropriate adjustments for potential confounding factors.
Many studies included in the review had significant design weaknesses.
Evidence suggests that patients with kidney transplants may experience better rates of life participation compared with patients receiving dialysis, whereas patients receiving hemodialysis and patients receiving peritoneal dialysis may experience similar rates of life participation. Rigorously performed studies are needed to better inform patients about the association of RRT with these important patient-reported outcomes.
需要对患者接受的肾脏替代治疗(RRT)方式与他们参与生活活动(身体机能、旅行、娱乐、自由和工作)的情况进行全面评估。
对同行评审的已发表研究进行系统回顾。
接受 RRT(血液透析、腹膜透析或移植)的成年人。
我们检索了 1980 年 1 月至 2012 年 4 月期间的 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 EMBASE 数据库,以查找比较接受以下 RRT 方式的患者参与生活活动情况的英文文献:(1)血液透析与腹膜透析相比,(2)血液透析与肾移植相比,或(3)腹膜透析与肾移植相比。
RRT 方式。
RRT 方式报告的身体机能、旅行、娱乐、自由和与工作相关的活动的发生率。
46 项研究(6 项前瞻性队列研究、38 项横断面研究和 2 项移植前后研究)提供了关于接受血液透析、腹膜透析和肾移植治疗的患者生活参与活动的相关比较。这些研究于 1985 年至 2011 年在 16 个不同地点的不同患者群体中进行。大多数研究报告称,与接受血液透析或腹膜透析的患者相比,接受肾移植的患者生活参与率更高。相比之下,大多数研究报告称,接受血液透析的患者和接受腹膜透析的患者在结果方面没有差异。这些结果在整个研究期间、在不同人群中以及在对潜在混杂因素进行适当调整的研究子集中都是一致的。
综述中纳入的许多研究存在重大设计缺陷。
有证据表明,与接受透析的患者相比,接受肾移植的患者可能具有更高的生活参与率,而接受血液透析的患者和接受腹膜透析的患者可能具有相似的生活参与率。需要进行严格设计的研究,以便更好地向患者提供有关 RRT 与这些重要的患者报告结果之间关联的信息。