Suppr超能文献

管理胎龄≤34 6/7 周的疑似或确诊早发性细菌性败血症新生儿。

Management of Neonates Born at ≤34 6/7 Weeks' Gestation With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2018 Dec;142(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2896.

Abstract

Early-onset sepsis (EOS) remains a serious and often fatal illness among infants born preterm, particularly among newborn infants of the lowest gestational age. Currently, most preterm infants with very low birth weight are treated empirically with antibiotics for risk of EOS, often for prolonged periods, in the absence of a culture-confirmed infection. Retrospective studies have revealed that antibiotic exposures after birth are associated with multiple subsequent poor outcomes among preterm infants, making the risk/benefit balance of these antibiotic treatments uncertain. Gestational age is the strongest single predictor of EOS, and the majority of preterm births occur in the setting of other factors associated with risk of EOS, making it difficult to apply risk stratification strategies to preterm infants. Laboratory tests alone have a poor predictive value in preterm EOS. Delivery characteristics of extremely preterm infants present an opportunity to identify those with a lower risk of EOS and may inform decisions to initiate or extend antibiotic therapies. Our purpose for this clinical report is to provide a summary of the current epidemiology of preterm neonatal sepsis and provide guidance for the development of evidence-based approaches to sepsis risk assessment among preterm newborn infants.

摘要

早发性败血症(EOS)仍然是早产儿中一种严重且常常致命的疾病,尤其是在最低胎龄的新生儿中。目前,大多数极低出生体重的早产儿在没有培养证实感染的情况下,出于 EOS 风险的考虑,通常会接受经验性抗生素治疗,且治疗时间往往较长。回顾性研究表明,出生后使用抗生素与早产儿的多种后续不良结局相关,这使得这些抗生素治疗的风险/获益平衡变得不确定。胎龄是 EOS 的最强单一预测因素,大多数早产儿的出生是在与 EOS 风险相关的其他因素的背景下发生的,这使得对早产儿进行风险分层策略变得困难。实验室检查单独用于预测早产儿 EOS 的效果不佳。极早产儿的分娩特征为识别 EOS 风险较低的婴儿提供了机会,并可能为决定开始或延长抗生素治疗提供依据。我们撰写本临床报告的目的是总结早产儿新生儿败血症的当前流行病学,并为制定基于证据的早产儿败血症风险评估方法提供指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验