• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极结石的疗效

Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower Pole Stones.

作者信息

Singh Dongol Udaya Man, Bohora Sandeep

机构信息

Department of Urosurgery, Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu.

出版信息

J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018 Oct 30;16(3):274-278.

PMID:30455485
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urolithiasis is a worldwide problem  due to its high prevalence and  recurrence. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a minimally invasive surgical option for the treatment of large renal stone burden greater than 20mm, staghorn calculi and lower pole calyceal stone greater than 10 mm. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and  efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower pole calyceal stones.

METHODS

Seventy  patients who presented in between June 2013 and September 2017 with  lower pole calyceal stones and lower calyceal stones with pelvic extension  were included in the study. The operating time, the hospital stay, complications rate, stone clearance rate were all noted. Patients were followed up in three and six weeks with X-ray KUB and ultrasonography of abdomen.

RESULTS

Seventy adult patients with lower pole calyceal stones underwent standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The mean age was 32 years (18-71 yrs). The mean stone size was 17.6 mm (15 -28 mm). The mean operating time was 62 minutes (48-124 mins) and hospital stay was 4.1 days(4-8 days). The stone clearance rate was 92.6% for stone <20mm and 90.7% stone size >20 mm. The complications noted were fever (8.5%), transient haematuria (20%), urine leak (5.7%), obstruction by residual fragments (5.7%) and one pseudoaneurysm(1.42%). Seven patients (10%) needed blood transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe, feasible and highly effective method for the treatment of lower pole calyceal stones.

摘要

背景

尿石症因其高发病率和复发率成为一个全球性问题。经皮肾镜取石术是治疗直径大于20mm的巨大肾结石、鹿角形结石以及直径大于10mm的下极肾盏结石的一种微创手术选择。本研究的目的是评估经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾盏结石的安全性和有效性。

方法

纳入2013年6月至2017年9月间出现下极肾盏结石及伴有肾盂延伸的下肾盏结石的70例患者。记录手术时间、住院时间、并发症发生率、结石清除率。术后3周和6周对患者进行腹部X线KUB和超声检查随访。

结果

70例患有下极肾盏结石的成年患者接受了标准经皮肾镜取石术。平均年龄为32岁(18 - 71岁)。平均结石大小为17.6mm(15 - 28mm)。平均手术时间为62分钟(48 - 124分钟),住院时间为4.1天(4 - 8天)。结石直径<20mm的结石清除率为92.6%,结石直径>20mm的结石清除率为90.7%。观察到的并发症有发热(8.5%)、短暂性血尿(20%)、尿漏(5.7%)、残余碎片梗阻(5.7%)和1例假性动脉瘤(1.42%)。7例患者(10%)需要输血。

结论

经皮肾镜取石术是治疗下极肾盏结石的一种安全、可行且高效的方法。

相似文献

1
Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower Pole Stones.经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极结石的疗效
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018 Oct 30;16(3):274-278.
2
A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones.微创经皮肾镜取石术(Microperc)与逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)治疗下极肾结石的前瞻性随机对照比较。
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1771-1776. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2058-9. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
3
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in anomalous-kidneys: a prospective study.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗异常肾肾结石: 一项前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0926-1. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
4
The role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).超微经皮肾镜取石术 (SMP) 在冲击波碎石术 (SWL) 或逆行肾内手术 (RIRS) 失败后治疗症状性下极肾结石 (LPS) 的作用。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Jun;47(3):297-301. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1068-4. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
5
Does Access Location Influence Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Staghorn Stones?穿刺部位会影响鹿角形结石经皮肾镜取石术的结果吗?
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Sep;31(9):1075-1080. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.09.1075.
6
Fluoroscopy versus ultrasonography guided mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.荧光透视引导与超声引导下经皮肾镜取石术治疗常染色体显性多囊肾病患者的比较
Urolithiasis. 2017 Jun;45(3):297-303. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0901-x. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children.儿童经皮肾镜取石术的安全性和有效性
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2017 Sep 8;15(2):130-134. doi: 10.3126/jnhrc.v15i2.18192.
8
Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study.微通道与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:一项对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Apr;47(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1055-9. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
Zero-fragment Nephrolithotomy: A Multi-center Evaluation of Robotic Pyelolithotomy and Nephrolithotomy for Treating Renal Stones.零碎片肾切开取石术:机器人肾盂切开取石术和肾切开取石术治疗肾结石的多中心评估。
Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):1014-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
10
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience.无侧卧位改良仰卧位下微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:单中心经验。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):585-589. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0966-1. Epub 2017 Feb 22.