Suppr超能文献

零碎片肾切开取石术:机器人肾盂切开取石术和肾切开取石术治疗肾结石的多中心评估。

Zero-fragment Nephrolithotomy: A Multi-center Evaluation of Robotic Pyelolithotomy and Nephrolithotomy for Treating Renal Stones.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):1014-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic pyelolithotomy (RPL) and robotic nephrolithotomy (RNL) may be utilized for treating kidney stones as an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy or flexible ureteroscopy.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the techniques of RPL and RNL, and present multi-center outcome data for patients undergoing these procedures.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 27 patients undergoing RPL and RNL at five tertiary academic institutions between 2008 and 2014.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

RPL and RNL without use of renal ischemia.

MEASUREMENTS

We assessed stone clearance by visual assessment and postoperative imaging. We also examined other factors, including complications (Clavien grade), estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of stay.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Twenty-seven patients underwent 28 procedures for a mean renal stone size of 2.74cm (standard deviation: 1.4, range: 0.8-5.8). The mean stone volume was 10.2cm. RPL accounted for 26 of these procedures. RNL was performed in one patient, while another underwent combined RPL-RNL. Indications included failed previous endourological management (13), staghorn calculi (five), gas containing stone (one), calyceal diverticulum (one), complex urinary tract reconstruction (two), and patient preference (four). The mean patient age was 35.6 yr and mean body mass index was 25.5kg/m. Mean operative time/console times were 182min and 128min, respectively. The mean estimated blood loss was 38ml. The mean length of stay was 1.7 d. There was no significant change in preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels. The overall complication rate was 18.5% (Clavien 1=3.7%; 2=7.4%; 3b=7.4%). The complete stone-free rate was 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

RPL and RNL are safe and reasonable options for removing renal stones in select patients. In particular, RPL allows the removal of stones without transgressing the parenchyma, reducing potential bleeding and nephron loss.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The robotic approach allows for complete removal of the renal stone without fragmentation, thereby maximizing chances for complete stone clearance in one procedure.

摘要

背景

机器人肾盂切开取石术(RPL)和机器人肾切开取石术(RNL)可作为经皮肾镜取石术或软性输尿管镜取石术的替代方法,用于治疗肾结石。

目的

描述 RPL 和 RNL 的技术,并介绍这些手术患者的多中心结果数据。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项对 2008 年至 2014 年间在 5 家三级学术机构接受 RPL 和 RNL 治疗的 27 例患者进行的回顾性分析。

手术过程

不使用肾缺血的 RPL 和 RNL。

测量

我们通过视觉评估和术后影像学检查评估结石清除情况。我们还检查了其他因素,包括并发症(Clavien 分级)、估计失血量、手术时间和住院时间。

结果和局限性

27 例患者接受了 28 次手术,平均肾结石大小为 2.74cm(标准差:1.4,范围:0.8-5.8)。平均结石体积为 10.2cm。这些手术中有 26 例为 RPL。1 例患者行 RNL,另 1 例患者行 RPL-RNL 联合手术。手术指征包括先前内镜治疗失败(13 例)、鹿角形结石(5 例)、含气结石(1 例)、肾盂憩室(1 例)、复杂泌尿道重建(2 例)和患者偏好(4 例)。患者平均年龄为 35.6 岁,平均体重指数为 25.5kg/m。平均手术时间/控制台时间分别为 182 分钟和 128 分钟。平均估计失血量为 38ml。平均住院时间为 1.7 天。术前和术后血清肌酐水平无明显变化。总的并发症发生率为 18.5%(Clavien 1=3.7%;2=7.4%;3b=7.4%)。完全无结石率为 96%。

结论

RPL 和 RNL 是治疗特定患者肾结石的安全合理选择。特别是,RPL 允许在不侵犯实质的情况下取出结石,从而最大限度地提高单次手术完全清除结石的机会。

患者总结

机器人方法可以实现肾结石的完全清除,而无需碎石,从而最大限度地提高单次手术完全清除结石的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验