Salis Christos, Martin Nadine, Meehan Sarah V, McCaffery Kevin
Newcastle University, Speech & Language Sciences, King George VI building, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK, +44 191 208 8875,
Temple University, Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Ritter Annex, 1301 Cecil B Moore Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA, +1 215 204 1870.
J Neurolinguistics. 2018 Nov;48:176-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 May 4.
Auditory-verbal short-term memory impairments are part and parcel of aphasia and interfere with linguistic processing. To date, the science about short-term memory impairments in aphasia has been generated and dominated by studying measures of accuracy, that is, span length. Because accuracy is expressed through speech, examining the speech-timing characteristics of persons with aphasia as they engage in spoken recall could reveal insights about the manner in which accuracy is achieved. Six speech-timing measures (e.g., response durations, pause durations) were elicited from the speech waveform of word span tasks from twelve people with aphasia. Speech-timing measures were compared to neuro-typical control participants. Speech-timing performance between erroneous and correct responses in the aphasia group was also examined. Across all measures, people with aphasia produced considerably longer speech-timing patterns in comparison to control participants. Memory load affected some measures in people with aphasia and control participants. Speech-timing in correct response trials was shorter than responses in erroneous trials. Memory span correlated only with one measure, namely, speech time (defined as the sum of each individual word duration in a response). Speech time also correlated with the following measures: Aphasia severity (Aphasia Quotient of the Western Aphasia Battery), spontaneous speech, and language comprehension (also measured by the Western Aphasia Battery). Some protracted speech-timing patterns in the aphasia group may be explained by a deregulation of activation-decay patterns. However, in the absence of further evidence from people with aphasia, possible issues around the sensitivity of some speech-timing measures limit firmer conclusions. Speech-timing measures are response-time measures, which have not been systematically studied in studies of short-term or working memory in aphasia and as such, can push the current boundaries of knowledge of short-term and working memory impairments in aphasia, not only in stroke related aphasia but also other neurological conditions.
听觉言语短期记忆障碍是失语症的重要组成部分,会干扰语言处理。迄今为止,关于失语症短期记忆障碍的科学研究主要是通过研究准确性指标,即记忆广度来开展和主导的。由于准确性是通过言语来体现的,因此,研究失语症患者在进行言语回忆时的言语时间特征,可能会揭示出实现准确性的方式。从12名失语症患者的单词广度任务的语音波形中提取了六种言语时间指标(例如,反应时长、停顿时长)。将言语时间指标与神经典型对照组参与者进行了比较。还研究了失语症组中错误反应和正确反应之间的言语时间表现。在所有指标中,与对照组参与者相比,失语症患者产生的言语时间模式要长得多。记忆负荷对失语症患者和对照组参与者的一些指标有影响。正确反应试验中的言语时间比错误试验中的反应时间短。记忆广度仅与一个指标相关,即言语时间(定义为反应中每个单词持续时间的总和)。言语时间还与以下指标相关:失语症严重程度(西方失语症成套测验的失语症商数)、自发言语和语言理解(也由西方失语症成套测验测量)。失语症组中一些延长的言语时间模式可能是由激活 - 衰减模式失调来解释的。然而,在没有来自失语症患者的进一步证据的情况下,一些言语时间指标的敏感性可能存在的问题限制了得出更确凿的结论。言语时间指标是反应时间指标,在失语症的短期或工作记忆研究中尚未得到系统研究,因此,它不仅可以拓展与中风相关失语症,还能拓展其他神经系统疾病中失语症短期和工作记忆障碍的现有知识边界。