• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我建构如何影响对拟人化品牌的反应,重点关注品牌、送礼者和受礼者之间的三因素关系。

How Self-Construals Affect Responses to Anthropomorphic Brands, With a Focus on the Three-Factor Relationship Between the Brand, the Gift-Giver and the Recipient.

作者信息

Lin Chien-Huang, Huang Yidan

机构信息

Department of Business Administration, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 5;9:2070. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02070. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02070
PMID:30455652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6230587/
Abstract

The universal mantra, "The customer is our king," has led to considerable focus on the servant-anthropomorphized brand. However, does your "king" want to be served as a "king"? This research aims to examine how anthropomorphic brand role, self-construals and consumer responses to brands interact. In this study, four sequential experiments show that consumers with an interdependent self-construal are likely to respond more favorably toward anthropomorphic brands playing superior 'master' roles than toward those playing subordinate 'servant' roles. Here we distinguish between two types of superior role (master and mentor) based on behavior and communications. We also explore the underlying psychological mechanism of followership, as demonstrated through blind followership of someone in a master role and rational followership of someone in a mentor role. Additionally, when a third-party (recipient) is involved in the relationship between a consumer and a brand, the giver-recipient relationship moderates the relationship between an anthropomorphised brand role and self-construals.

摘要

“顾客就是上帝”这句普遍适用的口头禅,使得人们相当关注被拟人化为仆人的品牌。然而,你的“上帝”希望被当作“上帝”来侍奉吗?本研究旨在探讨拟人化品牌角色、自我构念以及消费者对品牌的反应是如何相互作用的。在这项研究中,四个连贯的实验表明,具有相互依存自我构念的消费者,相较于扮演从属“仆人”角色的拟人化品牌,更有可能对扮演优越“主人”角色的拟人化品牌做出更积极的反应。在此,我们根据行为和沟通方式区分出两种优越角色(主人和导师)。我们还探究了追随者身份的潜在心理机制,这体现在对处于主人角色者的盲目追随以及对处于导师角色者的理性追随上。此外,当第三方(接受者)介入消费者与品牌的关系时,给予者 - 接受者关系会调节拟人化品牌角色与自我构念之间的关系。

相似文献

1
How Self-Construals Affect Responses to Anthropomorphic Brands, With a Focus on the Three-Factor Relationship Between the Brand, the Gift-Giver and the Recipient.自我建构如何影响对拟人化品牌的反应,重点关注品牌、送礼者和受礼者之间的三因素关系。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 5;9:2070. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02070. eCollection 2018.
2
One independent or many independent? The relationship among self-construal, number of brand endorsers, and brand attitudes.单一代言人还是多个代言人?自我建构、品牌代言人数量与品牌态度之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 2;15:1328281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1328281. eCollection 2024.
3
Research on the Impact of Intercustomer Social Support on Customer Engagement Behaviors in Virtual Brand Communities.顾客间社会支持对虚拟品牌社区中顾客参与行为的影响研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;13(1):31. doi: 10.3390/bs13010031.
4
More Proximal, More Willing to Purchase: The Mechanism for Variability in Consumers' Purchase Intention Toward Sincere vs. Exciting Brands.越接近,越愿意购买:消费者对真诚型与活力型品牌购买意愿差异的机制
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 25;11:1258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01258. eCollection 2020.
5
Examining consumer luxury brand-related behavior intentions in a social media context: The moderating role of hedonic and utilitarian motivations.在社交媒体背景下考察消费者奢侈品品牌相关行为意向:享乐动机和实用动机的调节作用。
Physiol Behav. 2019 Mar 1;200:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
Brand awe: A key concept for understanding consumer response to luxury and premium brands.品牌敬畏:理解消费者对奢侈和高端品牌反应的关键概念。
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Mar 4;161(2):245-260. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1804313. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
7
Consumer Perceived Brand Innovativeness and Authenticity of Chinese Time-Honored Brand Restaurants: The Moderated Mediation Effect of Personal Traits.消费者对中华老字号餐饮品牌的创新性与正宗性认知:个人特质的调节中介效应
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jul 4;16:2481-2498. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S407396. eCollection 2023.
8
Underdog or Top Dog Brand Story? The Role of Self-Construal and Need of Uniqueness.弱者还是强者品牌故事?自我建构和独特性需求的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 26;12:765802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.765802. eCollection 2021.
9
Remember Me? Exposure to Unfamiliar Food Brands in Television Advertising and Online Advergames Drives Children's Brand Recognition, Attitudes, and Desire to Eat Foods: A Secondary Analysis from a Crossover Experimental-Control Study with Randomization at the Group Level.记得我吗?电视广告和在线广告游戏中不熟悉的食品品牌曝光会促使儿童对品牌产生认知、态度和食用意愿:一项在群组水平进行随机分组的交叉实验对照研究的二次分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Jan;120(1):120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
10
Cuteness or Coolness-How Does Different Anthropomorphic Brand Image Accelerate Consumers' Willingness to Buy Green Products?可爱还是酷炫——不同的拟人化品牌形象如何提升消费者购买绿色产品的意愿?
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 31;12:599385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.599385. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Broadcasters' Leadership Traits and Audiences' Loyalty With the Moderating Role of Self-Construal: An Exploratory Study.广播公司领导者特质与受众忠诚度以及自我建构的调节作用:一项探索性研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 22;12:605784. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.605784. eCollection 2021.
2
When the Underdog Positioning Backfires! The Effects of Ethical Transgressions on Attitudes Toward Underdog Brands.当弱者定位适得其反!道德违规行为对弱势品牌态度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 4;11:1988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01988. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Follow Your Heart: How Is Willingness to Pay Formed under Multiple Anchors?跟随你的内心:多重锚定下支付意愿是如何形成的?
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 22;8:2269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02269. eCollection 2017.
2
Consumer-Brand Relationships under the Marketing 3.0 Paradigm: A Literature Review.营销3.0范式下的消费者-品牌关系:文献综述
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 22;8:252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00252. eCollection 2017.
3
Brands as Intentional Agents Framework: How Perceived Intentions and Ability Can Map Brand Perception.品牌作为意向性主体框架:感知意图与能力如何塑造品牌认知
J Consum Psychol. 2012 Apr;22(2). doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.006.
4
On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.见人如己:拟人化的三因素理论。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):864-86. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
5
The two faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency.变革型领导的两面:授权与依赖。
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Apr;88(2):246-55. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.246.
6
Building research competence in nursing through mentoring.通过指导培养护理研究能力。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(4):391-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00391.x.
7
The dependent personality: developmental, social, and clinical perspectives.依赖型人格:发展、社会及临床视角
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):3-23. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.3.