• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

越接近,越愿意购买:消费者对真诚型与活力型品牌购买意愿差异的机制

More Proximal, More Willing to Purchase: The Mechanism for Variability in Consumers' Purchase Intention Toward Sincere vs. Exciting Brands.

作者信息

Hu Tingyun, Shi Bing

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 25;11:1258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01258. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01258
PMID:32670148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7330119/
Abstract

Sincerity and excitement are core brand personality dimensions, which capture the majority of consumers' personality perceptions associated with brands. Previous research has demonstrated that consumers are more willing to purchase sincere brands than exciting brands. The present research addresses the mechanism underlying this variability. A total of four studies were conducted. Study 1 adopted survey-based design and manipulated brand personality by two versions of fictitious coffee brands. Results showed that sincere (vs. exciting) brands elicited more proximal psychological distance and in turn led to higher purchase intention. With a similar procedure, a different sample, and a different product (vacuum cup), Study 2 replicated the pattern demonstrated in Study 1. Moreover, the impact of brand personality upon psychological distance was found to be more prominent among consumers with high (vs. low) levels of attachment anxiety. Because psychological distance is proposed and proved to be a critical variable for mediating the variability in purchase intention, we adopted cognitive computerized tasks in Studies 3-4 to test whether stimuli perceived as sincere and exciting will induce different responses relevant to the perceptions of psychological distance. Study 3 adopted a picture-word version of Stroop task to test whether the automatic activation of personality-priming words would carry various perceptions of psychological distance, and results showed that participants classified distance faster when a close (vs. far) spatial distance matched sincere words and when a far (vs. close) spatial distance matched exciting words. Study 4 adopted the interference task to examine whether visual attention would be affected by personality-priming images, and results indicated a stronger cueing effect and an articulated interference effect for sincere (vs. exciting) figures. This research advances the literature of brand personality by probing the important role of psychological distance and further elaborating on the variability of consumer behavior toward sincere and exciting brands.

摘要

真诚和活力是核心品牌个性维度,它们涵盖了大多数消费者对品牌的个性认知。先前的研究表明,消费者更愿意购买真诚型品牌而非活力型品牌。本研究探讨了这种差异背后的机制。总共进行了四项研究。研究1采用基于调查的设计,通过两个虚构咖啡品牌版本操纵品牌个性。结果表明,真诚型(相对于活力型)品牌引发了更多的近心理距离,进而导致更高的购买意愿。采用类似的程序、不同的样本和不同的产品(真空杯),研究2复制了研究1中展示的模式。此外,发现品牌个性对心理距离的影响在依恋焦虑程度高(相对于低)的消费者中更为显著。由于心理距离被提出并证明是调节购买意愿差异的关键变量,我们在研究3 - 4中采用认知计算机任务来测试被视为真诚和活力的刺激是否会引发与心理距离感知相关的不同反应。研究3采用了图片 - 单词版本的斯特鲁普任务来测试个性启动词的自动激活是否会携带不同的心理距离感知,结果表明,当近距离(相对于远距离)空间距离与真诚词汇匹配,以及远距离(相对于近距离)空间距离与活力词汇匹配时,参与者对距离的分类更快。研究4采用干扰任务来检查视觉注意力是否会受到个性启动图像的影响,结果表明真诚(相对于活力)形象具有更强的提示效应和明显的干扰效应。本研究通过探究心理距离的重要作用,并进一步阐述消费者对真诚和活力品牌行为的差异,推进了品牌个性的文献研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c9/7330119/a8d2628b712a/fpsyg-11-01258-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c9/7330119/b3b474d005e9/fpsyg-11-01258-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c9/7330119/a8d2628b712a/fpsyg-11-01258-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c9/7330119/b3b474d005e9/fpsyg-11-01258-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c9/7330119/a8d2628b712a/fpsyg-11-01258-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
More Proximal, More Willing to Purchase: The Mechanism for Variability in Consumers' Purchase Intention Toward Sincere vs. Exciting Brands.越接近,越愿意购买:消费者对真诚型与活力型品牌购买意愿差异的机制
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 25;11:1258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01258. eCollection 2020.
2
The Impact Imposed by Brand Elements of Enterprises on the Purchase Intention of Consumers-With Experience Value Taken as the Intermediary Variable.企业品牌元素对消费者购买意愿的影响——以体验价值为中介变量
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 9;13:873041. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873041. eCollection 2022.
3
Psychological Distance Toward Air Pollution and Purchase Intention for New Energy Vehicles: An Investigation in China.对空气污染的心理距离与新能源汽车购买意愿:一项中国调查。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 1;12:569115. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.569115. eCollection 2021.
4
Effects of Consumer Dispositional Attitude on Purchase Intention in an Emerging Market.新兴市场中消费者的性格态度对购买意愿的影响。
F1000Res. 2024 Feb 28;12:384. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.131103.3. eCollection 2023.
5
The Negative Effects of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labels on Consumers' Food Brand Evaluation.体力活动能量等价标签对消费者食品品牌评价的负面影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 4;19(19):12676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912676.
6
The Effect of Brand Internationalization Strategy on Domestic Consumers' Purchase Intention: Configuration Analysis Based on Brand Authenticity Perspective.品牌国际化战略对国内消费者购买意愿的影响:基于品牌真实性视角的组态分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 2;13:891974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891974. eCollection 2022.
7
The influence of visual marketing on consumers' purchase intention of fast fashion brands in China-An exploration based on fsQCA method.视觉营销对中国消费者购买快时尚品牌意愿的影响——基于模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法的探究
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 8;15:1190571. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1190571. eCollection 2024.
8
Product presentation in the live-streaming context: The effect of consumer perceived product value and time pressure on consumer's purchase intention.直播情境下的产品展示:消费者感知产品价值和时间压力对消费者购买意愿的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1124675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124675. eCollection 2023.
9
The impact of brand trust on consumers' behavior toward agricultural products' regional public brand.品牌信任对消费者针对农产品区域公用品牌行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0295133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295133. eCollection 2023.
10
Determinants of Consumers' Trust in Biotech Brands and Purchase Intentions towards the Cord Blood Products.消费者对生物技术品牌的信任度及对脐带血产品购买意愿的影响因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 4;18(21):11574. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111574.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring Internet Slang Style in the Marketing Context: Scale Development and Validation.在营销背景下衡量网络俚语风格:量表开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 18;12:751806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751806. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Is There Anybody Out There? Attachment Style and Interpersonal Facilitators as Protective Factors Against Complicated Grief Among Suicide-Loss Survivors.有人在吗?依恋风格和人际促进因素作为自杀身亡幸存者复杂悲伤的保护因素。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2019 Mar;207(3):131-136. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000940.
2
Deployment of Attention on Handshakes.握手时注意力的运用。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 9;7:681. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00681. eCollection 2016.
3
From "Where" to "What": Distributed Representations of Brand Associations in the Human Brain.
从“何处”到“何物”:人类大脑中品牌联想的分布式表征
J Mark Res. 2015 Aug 1;52(4):453-466. doi: 10.1509/jmr.14.0606.
4
Traversing psychological distance.穿越心理距离。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;18(7):364-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
5
Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior.解释水平与心理距离:对表征、预测、评估及行为的影响
J Consum Psychol. 2007;17(2):83-95. doi: 10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X.
6
Interpersonal Similarity as a Social Distance Dimension: Implications for Perception of Others' Actions.人际相似性作为一种社会距离维度:对他人行为认知的影响
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2008;44(5):1256-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007.
7
Keeping one's distance: the influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation.保持距离:空间距离线索对情感和评价的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;19(3):302-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x.
8
Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task.心理距离的自动加工:来自斯特鲁普任务的证据
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Nov;136(4):610-22. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610.
9
Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups.群体美德:道德(相对于能力和社交性)在对内群体的积极评价中的重要性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Aug;93(2):234-49. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234.
10
The role of adult attachment security in non-romantic, non-attachment-related first interactions between same-sex strangers.成人依恋安全感在同性陌生人之间非浪漫、非依恋相关的初次互动中的作用。
Attach Hum Dev. 2006 Dec;8(4):341-52. doi: 10.1080/14616730601048217.