Suppr超能文献

免疫学观念作为补充与替代医学从业者反对疫苗接种的一个因素。

Immunology beliefs as a factor in vaccine opposition among complementary and alternative medical providers.

作者信息

Bean Sandra J, Catania Joseph A

机构信息

College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.

出版信息

SAGE Open Med. 2018 Oct 31;6:2050312118807625. doi: 10.1177/2050312118807625. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Parental pediatric vaccine decisions are influenced by parents' health provider networks. Complementary and alternative medical providers may be key influences in the networks of those parents who do not vaccinate their children.

METHODS

From March to July 2013, we conducted semi-structured interviews of Oregon complementary and alternative medical providers ( = 36) in five disciplines likely to treat parents or children, or both, and whose practitioners are known to express opinions about vaccines and vaccination. We interviewed them concerning their immunology beliefs, vaccine positions, and what these providers recommend to their patients concerning vaccines. We conducted face-to-face interviews and analyzed the interview data using thematic analysis methodology.

RESULTS

This article identifies the range and type of immunological beliefs of complementary and alternative medical providers concerning pediatric vaccine recommendations. From repeated readings of the data, we identified three areas of alternative immunological beliefs among complementary and alternative medical providers (i.e. "natural is best," "innate intelligence," and "the fragile immune system"). In addition, complementary and alternative medical providers who embraced mainstream medicine were likely to be vaccine accepters and to mention vaccines as a positive health measure to their patients-these themes were "vaccines prevent illness" and "herd immunity."

CONCLUSION

Complementary and alternative medical providers influence their patients' vaccination decisions, particularly urging caution or complete vaccine avoidance, and may be a major influence in states like Oregon with high non-medical exemption rates. Complementary and alternative medical providers come to their anti-vaccine positions largely through post-graduation continuing education courses and seminars. In Oregon, such courses are unregulated and not vetted.

摘要

目的

父母对儿科疫苗的决策受其医疗服务提供者网络的影响。补充和替代医学提供者可能是那些不给孩子接种疫苗的父母网络中的关键影响因素。

方法

2013年3月至7月,我们对俄勒冈州五个学科的补充和替代医学提供者(n = 36)进行了半结构化访谈,这些学科可能会治疗父母或孩子,或两者皆治,并且已知其从业者会表达有关疫苗和接种的意见。我们就他们的免疫学信念、疫苗立场以及这些提供者向患者推荐的疫苗相关内容进行了访谈。我们进行了面对面访谈,并使用主题分析方法对访谈数据进行了分析。

结果

本文确定了补充和替代医学提供者在儿科疫苗推荐方面的免疫学信念范围和类型。通过对数据的反复研读,我们在补充和替代医学提供者中确定了三个替代免疫学信念领域(即“自然就是最好的”、“先天智慧”和“脆弱的免疫系统”)。此外,接受主流医学的补充和替代医学提供者可能是疫苗接受者,并会向患者提及疫苗是一项积极的健康措施——这些主题是“疫苗预防疾病”和“群体免疫”。

结论

补充和替代医学提供者会影响其患者的疫苗接种决策,特别是敦促谨慎或完全避免接种疫苗,并且在非医学豁免率高的州(如俄勒冈州)可能是一个主要影响因素。补充和替代医学提供者形成其反疫苗立场主要是通过毕业后的继续教育课程和研讨会。在俄勒冈州,此类课程不受监管且未经审核。

相似文献

4
Vaccine perceptions among Oregon health care providers.俄勒冈州医护人员对疫苗的看法。
Qual Health Res. 2013 Sep;23(9):1251-66. doi: 10.1177/1049732313501891. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy.道德价值观与疫苗犹豫的关联。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Dec;1(12):873-880. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0256-5. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
7
Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial.疫苗推广中的有效信息:一项随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):e835-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2365. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验