Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, Colorado.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):837-843. doi: 10.1111/dom.13587. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
The use of incretin-based therapy, rather than or complementary to, insulin therapy is an active area of research in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We determined the glycaemic efficacy and safety of linagliptin compared to a basal-bolus insulin regimen in hospitalized surgical patients with T2D.
This prospective open-label multicentre study randomized T2D patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with admission blood glucose (BG) of 7.8 to 22.2 mmol/L who were under treatment with diet, oral agents or total insulin dose (TDD) ≤ 0.5 units/kg/day to either linagliptin (n = 128) daily or basal-bolus (n = 122) with glargine once daily and rapid-acting insulin before meals. Both groups received supplemental insulin for BG > 7.8 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was difference in mean daily BG between groups.
Mean daily BG was higher in the linagliptin group compared to the basal-bolus group (9.5 ± 2.6 vs 8.8 ± 2.3 mmol/L/dL, P = 0.03) with a mean daily BG difference of 0.6 mmol/L (95% confidence interval 0.04, 1.2). In patients with randomization BG < 11.1 mmol/L (63% of cohort), mean daily BG was similar in the linagliptin and basal-bolus groups (8.9 ± 2.3 vs 8.7 ± 2.3 mmol/L, P = 0.43); however, patients with BG ≥ 11.1 mmol/L who were treated with linagliptin had higher BG compared to the basal-bolus group (10.9 ± 2.6 vs 9.2 ± 2.2 mmol/L, P < 0.001). Linagliptin resulted in fewer hypoglycaemic events (1.6% vs 11%, P = 0.001; 86% relative risk reduction), with similar supplemental insulin and fewer daily insulin injections (2.0 ± 3.3 vs 3.1 ± 3.3, P < 0.001) compared to the basal-bolus group.
For patients with T2D undergoing non-cardiac surgery who presented with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia (BG < 11.1 mmol/L), daily linagliptin is a safe and effective alternative to multi-dose insulin therapy, resulting in similar glucose control with lower hypoglycaemia.
在 2 型糖尿病(T2D)住院患者中,使用基于肠促胰岛素的治疗方法,而不是或补充胰岛素治疗,是一个活跃的研究领域。我们比较了利拉利汀与基础-餐时胰岛素方案在 T2D 住院手术患者中的降糖疗效和安全性。
这项前瞻性、开放标签的多中心研究纳入了接受非心脏手术、入院时血糖(BG)为 7.8 至 22.2mmol/L、正在接受饮食、口服药物或总胰岛素剂量(TDD)≤0.5 单位/公斤/天治疗的 T2D 患者,将其随机分为利拉利汀组(n=128)或基础-餐时胰岛素组(n=122),分别给予每日利拉利汀或甘精胰岛素每日一次和餐前速效胰岛素。两组均给予 BG>7.8mmol/L 的补充胰岛素。主要终点为两组间平均每日 BG 差异。
与基础-餐时胰岛素组相比,利拉利汀组的平均每日 BG 更高(9.5±2.6 与 8.8±2.3mmol/L/dL,P=0.03),平均每日 BG 差异为 0.6mmol/L(95%置信区间 0.04,1.2)。在随机 BG<11.1mmol/L(队列的 63%)的患者中,利拉利汀组和基础-餐时胰岛素组的平均每日 BG 相似(8.9±2.3 与 8.7±2.3mmol/L,P=0.43);然而,BG≥11.1mmol/L 的接受利拉利汀治疗的患者 BG 高于基础-餐时胰岛素组(10.9±2.6 与 9.2±2.2mmol/L,P<0.001)。与基础-餐时胰岛素组相比,利拉利汀组低血糖事件更少(1.6%与 11%,P=0.001;相对风险降低 86%),补充胰岛素和每日胰岛素注射次数更少(2.0±3.3 与 3.1±3.3,P<0.001)。
对于接受非心脏手术、血糖轻度至中度升高(BG<11.1mmol/L)的 T2D 患者,每日利拉利汀是多剂量胰岛素治疗的安全有效替代方案,可实现相似的血糖控制,低血糖风险更低。