Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Durham, North Carolina.
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):854-865. doi: 10.1111/dom.13589. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
To examine the outcomes of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor initiation with and without concurrent metformin treatment.
We identified Medicare enrollees initiating a DPP-4 inhibitor, a sulphonylurea or a thiazolidinedione. Using propensity-score-weighted Poisson models, we evaluated 1-year cardiovascular (CV) outcome incidence among initiators of DPP-4 inhibitors versus comparators in subgroups with and without concurrent metformin use, and assessed the interaction between initiation drug and metformin. Outcomes included mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and a composite outcome.
For the DPP-4 inhibitor (n = 13 391) versus sulphonylurea (n = 33 206) comparison, rate differences in composite outcome incidence favoured DPP-4 inhibitors: -2.0/100 person-years among metformin users (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.7 to -1.3) and - 1.0/100 person-years (95% CI -1.8 to -0.2) among metformin non-users. Similar rate difference trends among metformin users and non-users were seen for mortality (-1.5/100 person-years [95% CI -2.1 to -0.9] and -0.7/100 person-years [95% CI -1.4 to 0.0]) and non-fatal MI (-0.5/100 person-years [95% CI -0.8, -0.3] and 0.1/100 person-years [95% CI -0.2 to 0.4]). The interaction between DPP-4 inhibitor initiation and metformin was statistically significant for non-fatal MI (P = 0.008). For the DPP-4 inhibitor (n = 22 210) versus thiazolidinedione (n = 9517) comparison, rate differences in composite outcome incidence for DPP-4 inhibitor initiation were -0.6/100 person-years (95% CI -1.5 to 0.2) among metformin users and 1.0 (95% CI 0.0 to 2.0) among metformin non-users. Similar rate difference trends among metformin users and non-users were seen for mortality (-0.5/100 person-years [95% CI -1.3 to 0.1] and 0.8/100 person-years [95% CI -0.0 to 1.7]) and non-fatal MI (-0.1/100 person-years [95% CI -0.4 to 0.2] and 0.2/100 person-years [95% CI -0.1 to 0.6]). The interaction between DPP-4 inhibitor initiation and metformin was statistically significant for the composite outcome (P = 0.024) and mortality (P = 0.023).
Incidence rate differences in multiple CV outcomes appeared more favourable when DPP-4 inhibitor initiation occurred in the presence of metformin, suggesting a possible interaction between DPP-4 inhibitors and metformin.
研究二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂与二甲双胍同时或不同时起始治疗的结局。
我们确定了开始使用 DPP-4 抑制剂、磺酰脲类或噻唑烷二酮类药物的医疗保险参保者。使用倾向评分加权泊松模型,我们评估了 DPP-4 抑制剂与磺酰脲类药物起始治疗者在同时使用和不使用二甲双胍的亚组中的 1 年心血管(CV)结局发生率,并评估了起始药物与二甲双胍之间的相互作用。结局包括死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、卒中和复合结局。
与磺酰脲类药物(n=33206)相比,DPP-4 抑制剂(n=13391)的复合结局发生率差异有利于 DPP-4 抑制剂:二甲双胍使用者为-2.0/100 人年(95%置信区间[CI]为-2.7 至-1.3),二甲双胍非使用者为-1.0/100 人年(95%CI 为-1.8 至-0.2)。在二甲双胍使用者和非使用者中,死亡率(-1.5/100 人年[95%CI 为-2.1 至-0.9]和-0.7/100 人年[95%CI 为-1.4 至 0.0])和非致死性 MI(-0.5/100 人年[95%CI 为-0.8,-0.3]和 0.1/100 人年[95%CI 为-0.2 至 0.4])的发生率差异趋势相似。DPP-4 抑制剂起始治疗与二甲双胍之间的交互作用在非致死性 MI 方面具有统计学意义(P=0.008)。与噻唑烷二酮类药物(n=9517)相比,DPP-4 抑制剂(n=22210)的复合结局发生率差异,二甲双胍使用者为-0.6/100 人年(95%CI 为-1.5 至 0.2),二甲双胍非使用者为 1.0(95%CI 为 0.0 至 2.0)。在二甲双胍使用者和非使用者中,死亡率(-0.5/100 人年[95%CI 为-1.3 至 0.1]和 0.8/100 人年[95%CI 为-0.0 至 1.7])和非致死性 MI(-0.1/100 人年[95%CI 为-0.4 至 0.2]和 0.2/100 人年[95%CI 为-0.1 至 0.6])的发生率差异趋势相似。DPP-4 抑制剂起始治疗与二甲双胍之间的交互作用在复合结局(P=0.024)和死亡率(P=0.023)方面具有统计学意义。
当 DPP-4 抑制剂与二甲双胍同时起始治疗时,多种 CV 结局的发生率差异似乎更为有利,这表明 DPP-4 抑制剂和二甲双胍之间可能存在相互作用。