比较 2 型糖尿病患者使用不同降糖药物的临床结局和不良事件:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events Associated With Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, University Campus, Dourouti, Ioannina, Greece3Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, Dourouti, Ioannina, G.

出版信息

JAMA. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):313-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9400.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Numerous glucose-lowering drugs are used to treat type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the relative efficacy and safety associated with glucose-lowering drugs including insulin.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases through March 21, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials of 24 weeks' or longer duration.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Random-effects network meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, myocardial infarction, stroke, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) level, treatment failure (rescue treatment or lack of efficacy), hypoglycemia, and body weight.

RESULTS

A total of 301 clinical trials (1,417,367 patient-months) were included; 177 trials (56,598 patients) of drugs given as monotherapy; 109 trials (53,030 patients) of drugs added to metformin (dual therapy); and 29 trials (10,598 patients) of drugs added to metformin and sulfonylurea (triple therapy). There were no significant differences in associations between any drug class as monotherapy, dual therapy, or triple therapy with odds of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Compared with metformin, sulfonylurea (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.18 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.34]), thiazolidinedione (SMD, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.00 to 0.31]), DPP-4 inhibitor (SMD, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.52]), and α-glucosidase inhibitor (SMD, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.58]) monotherapy were associated with higher HbA1C levels. Sulfonylurea (odds ratio [OR], 3.13 [95% CI, 2.39 to 4.12]; risk difference [RD], 10% [95% CI, 7% to 13%]) and basal insulin (OR, 17.9 [95% CI, 1.97 to 162]; RD, 10% [95% CI, 0.08% to 20%]) were associated with greatest odds of hypoglycemia. When added to metformin, drugs were associated with similar HbA1C levels, while SGLT-2 inhibitors offered the lowest odds of hypoglycemia (OR, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.08 to 0.18]; RD, -22% [-27% to -18%]). When added to metformin and sulfonylurea, GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with the lowest odds of hypoglycemia (OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.94]; RD, -10% [95% CI, -18% to -2%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among adults with type 2 diabetes, there were no significant differences in the associations between any of 9 available classes of glucose-lowering drugs (alone or in combination) and the risk of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Metformin was associated with lower or no significant difference in HbA1C levels compared with any other drug classes. All drugs were estimated to be effective when added to metformin. These findings are consistent with American Diabetes Association recommendations for using metformin monotherapy as initial treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes and selection of additional therapies based on patient-specific considerations.

摘要

重要性

有许多降血糖药物用于治疗 2 型糖尿病。

目的

评估包括胰岛素在内的降血糖药物的相对疗效和安全性。

数据来源

Cochrane 图书馆对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库,检索时间截至 2016 年 3 月 21 日。

研究选择

持续时间为 24 周或更长时间的随机临床试验。

数据提取和综合

随机效应网络荟萃分析。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是心血管死亡率。次要结局包括全因死亡率、严重不良事件、心肌梗死、卒中和血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1C)水平、治疗失败(救援治疗或无效)、低血糖和体重。

结果

共纳入 301 项临床试验(1417367 患者月);177 项(56598 例患者)药物单药治疗试验;109 项(53030 例患者)药物联合二甲双胍治疗试验;29 项(10598 例患者)药物联合二甲双胍和磺酰脲类药物治疗试验。任何药物类别(单药、联合或三联治疗)与心血管或全因死亡率的关联均无显著差异。与二甲双胍相比,磺酰脲类药物(标准化均数差[SMD],0.18[95%CI,0.01 至 0.34])、噻唑烷二酮类药物(SMD,0.16[95%CI,0.00 至 0.31])、DPP-4 抑制剂(SMD,0.33[95%CI,0.13 至 0.52])和α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(SMD,0.35[95%CI,0.12 至 0.58])单药治疗与 HbA1C 水平升高相关。磺酰脲类药物(比值比[OR],3.13[95%CI,2.39 至 4.12];风险差[RD],10%[95%CI,7%至 13%])和基础胰岛素(OR,17.9[95%CI,1.97 至 162];RD,10%[95%CI,0.08%至 20%])与低血糖的最大几率相关。当与二甲双胍联合使用时,药物与相似的 HbA1C 水平相关,而 SGLT-2 抑制剂与低血糖的几率最低(OR,0.12[95%CI,0.08 至 0.18];RD,-22%[-27% 至 -18%])。当与二甲双胍和磺酰脲类药物联合使用时,GLP-1 受体激动剂与低血糖的几率最低(OR,0.60[95%CI,0.39 至 0.94];RD,-10%[95%CI,-18% 至 -2%])。

结论和相关性

在 2 型糖尿病成人患者中,9 种(单独或联合使用)可用降血糖药物类别的任何一种与心血管或全因死亡率之间的关联均无显著差异。与其他任何药物类别相比,二甲双胍与 HbA1C 水平的降低或无显著差异相关。当添加到二甲双胍中时,所有药物均被估计有效。这些发现与美国糖尿病协会的建议一致,即使用二甲双胍作为 2 型糖尿病患者的初始治疗,并根据患者的具体情况选择其他治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索