Gathu Catherine W, Shabani Jacob, Kunyiha Nancy, Ratansi Riaz
Department of Family Medicine, The Aga Khan University.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Nov 19;10(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1762.
Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is a key component of diabetes care aimed at delaying complications. Unlike usual care, DSME is a more structured educational approach provided by trained, certified diabetes educators (CDE). In Kenya, many diabetic patients are yet to receive this integral component of care. At the family medicine clinic of the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Nairobi, the case is no different; most patients lack education by CDE.
This study sought to assess effects of DSME in comparison to usual diabetes care by family physicians.
Family Medicine Clinic, AKUH, Nairobi.
Non-blinded randomised clinical trial among sub-optimally controlled (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 8%) type 2 diabetes patients. The intervention was DSME by CDE plus usual care versus usual care from family physicians. Primary outcome was mean difference in HbA1c after six months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure and body mass index.
A total of 220 diabetes patients were screened out of which 140 met the eligibility criteria and were randomised. Around 96 patients (69%) completed the study; 55 (79%) in the DSME group and 41 (59%) in the usual care group. The baseline mean age and HbA1c of all patients were 48.8 (standard deviation [SD]: 9.8) years and 9.9% (SD: 1.76%), respectively. After a 6-month follow-up, no significant difference was noted in the primary outcome (HbA1c) between the two groups, with a mean difference of 0.37 (95% confidence interval: -0.45 to 1.19; p = 0.37). DSME also made no remarkable change in any of the secondary outcome measures.
From this study, short-term biomedical benefits of a structured educational approach seemed to be limited. This suggested that offering a short, intensified education programme might have limited additional benefit above and beyond the family physicians' comprehensive approach in managing chronic conditions like diabetes.
糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)是糖尿病护理的关键组成部分,旨在延缓并发症。与常规护理不同,DSME是一种由经过培训和认证的糖尿病教育者(CDE)提供的更具结构性的教育方法。在肯尼亚,许多糖尿病患者尚未接受这一重要的护理组成部分。在内罗毕阿迦汗大学医院(AKUH)的家庭医学诊所,情况也不例外;大多数患者缺乏CDE的教育。
本研究旨在评估DSME与家庭医生的常规糖尿病护理相比的效果。
内罗毕AKUH家庭医学诊所。
在控制不佳(糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≥8%)的2型糖尿病患者中进行非盲随机临床试验。干预措施是CDE提供的DSME加常规护理与家庭医生的常规护理。主要结局是随访6个月后HbA1c的平均差异。次要结局包括血压和体重指数。
共筛选出220例糖尿病患者,其中140例符合纳入标准并被随机分组。约96例患者(69%)完成了研究;DSME组55例(79%),常规护理组41例(59%)。所有患者的基线平均年龄和HbA1c分别为48.8岁(标准差[SD]:9.8)和9.9%(SD:1.76%)。随访6个月后,两组的主要结局(HbA1c)无显著差异,平均差异为0.37(95%置信区间:-0.45至1.19;p=0.37)。DSME在任何次要结局指标上也没有显著变化。
从本研究来看,结构化教育方法的短期生物医学益处似乎有限。这表明,提供一个短期强化教育计划,可能在家庭医生管理糖尿病等慢性病的综合方法之外,带来的额外益处有限。