Lipschuetz Michal, Cohen Sarah M, Lewkowicz Aya A, Amsalem Hagai, Haj Yahya Rani, Levitt Lorinne, Yagel Simcha
Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Harefuah. 2018 Nov;157(11):685-690.
Professional bodies have published guidelines defining the length of the second stage of labor and when it is "prolonged", according to parity and epidural anesthesia administration. Recently these guidelines have been extended, aiming to reduce rates of unplanned cesarean deliveries.
To examine the risk factors and outcomes of a prolonged second stage of labor, in order to understand its causes and implications for mothers and neonates, including the delivery mode.
A retrospective study based on 26,476 electronic medical records of deliveries to primiparous mothers of a term singleton fetus, at Hadassah Medical Center, between 2003 and 2015.
A prolonged second stage of labor was recorded in 3,225 (12.2%) of mothers (i.e. exceeding 2 hours without epidural anesthesia and 3 hours with it). Epidural anesthesia, persistent occiput posterior, and head circumference or birth weight above the 90th percentile, increased the risk of the prolonged second stage. The risk of unplanned cesarean delivery rose significantly before the 2- or 3-hour cut-off defining a prolonged second stage. Risks of maternal and neonatal complications included: grade III-IV perineal tear, maternal hemorrhage, 5-minute Apgar≤7, umbilical artery pH<7.1, neonatal intensive care admission were also increased.
Epidural anesthesia and fetal parameters increased the risk of prolonged second stage; risks of maternal and fetal complications were also increased. The risk of interventional delivery increased significantly well before the defined cut-off.
Prolongation of the second stage of labor is a common pathway of many obstetric outcomes. Obstetric management should be based on considerations of individual maternal and neonatal well-being, rather than administrative goals. While reducing cesarean rates is an important goal, attempts to achieve this by prolonging the second stage of labor exposes mothers and neonates to excess risk of cesarean and vacuum delivery as well as obstetric and neonatal complications.
专业机构已发布指南,根据产妇的胎次和硬膜外麻醉的使用情况,界定了第二产程的时长以及何时为“延长”。最近这些指南有所扩展,旨在降低非计划剖宫产率。
研究第二产程延长的危险因素及结局,以了解其原因以及对母亲和新生儿的影响,包括分娩方式。
一项回顾性研究,基于2003年至2015年间哈达萨医疗中心26476例初产妇单胎足月分娩的电子病历。
3225名(12.2%)母亲出现第二产程延长(即未使用硬膜外麻醉时超过2小时,使用时超过3小时)。硬膜外麻醉、持续性枕后位以及头围或出生体重高于第90百分位数,会增加第二产程延长的风险。在界定第二产程延长的2小时或3小时界限之前,非计划剖宫产的风险就显著上升。母婴并发症的风险包括:Ⅲ - Ⅳ度会阴裂伤、产妇出血、5分钟阿氏评分≤7分、脐动脉血pH<7.1、新生儿重症监护病房收治率也有所增加。
硬膜外麻醉和胎儿参数增加了第二产程延长的风险;母婴并发症的风险也增加了。在规定界限之前,干预性分娩的风险就显著增加。
第二产程延长是许多产科结局的常见途径。产科管理应基于对母婴个体健康状况的考虑,而非行政目标。虽然降低剖宫产率是一个重要目标,但试图通过延长第二产程来实现这一目标会使母亲和新生儿面临剖宫产、真空吸引分娩以及产科和新生儿并发症的额外风险。