Suppr超能文献

[护理期刊发表的定性研究评估:一项横断面研究方案]

[The evaluation of qualitative research published in nursing journals: protocol of a cross-sectional study].

作者信息

Guarinoni Milena Giovanni, Storti Matteo, Dignani Lucia, Motta Paolo Carlo

机构信息

Professore a Contratto, Dipartimento di Specialità medicochirurgiche, scienze radiologiche e sanità pubblica, Università degli Studi di Brescia.

Studente Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Scienze infermieristiche e Ostetriche,Università degli Studi di Brescia.

出版信息

Prof Inferm. 2018 Jul-Sep;71(3):173-177. doi: 10.7429/pi.2018.713173.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The nature of nursing has prompted researchers nurses to use a large number of qualitative methodology research. The trend showed a substantial increase in its production between 1997 and 2000 to settle back down in the following years although until recently the qualitative methodology was considered a non-scientific research. The growing number of publications with qualitative design is paid concern to verify the rigor and credibility of studies using this method. The use of the quality assessment tools showed that the methodological precision of studies with a qualitative design has grown over time.

AIM

Assessing, using the tool Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, the quality of qualitative studies published in the last five years by international nursing journals with higher impact factor.

METHOD

We will search the qualitative articles published on the ten most influential nursing journals that will be submitted by two independent researchers at the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool in its original version.

EXPECTED RESULTS

The results make it possible to observe whether the qualitative research produced in the field of nursing uses a rigorous methodology in the drafting of the report, assuming that the quality has grown in the past five years than in previous years.

CONCLUSION

The study will help researchers assess which level reached nurses in the development of qualitative research.

摘要

引言

护理的性质促使护理研究人员采用大量定性研究方法。这一趋势表明,在1997年至2000年间其产出大幅增加,在随后几年有所回落,尽管直到最近定性研究方法仍被视为非科学研究。越来越多的定性设计出版物受到关注,以验证使用该方法的研究的严谨性和可信度。质量评估工具的使用表明,定性设计研究的方法精度随着时间的推移有所提高。

目的

使用批判性评估技能计划工具,评估过去五年中由具有较高影响因子的国际护理期刊发表的定性研究的质量。

方法

我们将检索发表在十本最具影响力的护理期刊上的定性文章,由两名独立研究人员使用批判性评估技能计划工具的原始版本进行提交。

预期结果

结果将有助于观察护理领域产生的定性研究在报告撰写中是否采用了严谨的方法,假设过去五年的质量比前几年有所提高。

结论

该研究将帮助研究人员评估护理人员在定性研究发展中达到了何种水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验