Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.
Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
Pain Pract. 2019 Apr;19(4):370-381. doi: 10.1111/papr.12749. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
The role of contextual factors like pre-existing treatment expectations has been established. However, the effect of verbally delivered treatment expectations in patient-therapist communication has not been considered, nor has the role of cortisol changes within the placebo/nocebo response in people with chronic neck pain.
To examine the effect of verbally delivered treatment expectations on clinical outcomes in physical therapy practice and to determine if changes in cortisol levels are associated with changes in neck pain and disability.
Eighty-three patients with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated to 3 different verbally delivered expectations (positive, negative, neutral) during physical therapy interventions.
salivary cortisol, pain and disability, and cervical range of motion.
Pain significantly improved in the positive (P < 0.001) and neutral (P < 0.001) expectations groups. For salivary cortisol levels, a significant increase was observed in response to treatment in the neutral (P = 0.045) and negative (P < 0.001) expectations groups. No significant correlations were found between changes in salivary cortisol levels and the change in pain in the neutral and negative expectations groups.
Physical therapists treating people with chronic neck pain should be attentive when communicating the expected treatment effects to their patients. Whereas verbally delivered positive or neutral expectations may be beneficial for pain-related measures, giving negative expectations may result in a lack of a treatment response on pain. Cortisol levels increased in response to verbally delivered neutral and negative expectations, in the absence of a nocebo effect. This questions the presumed role of cortisol in the nocebo effect.
已经确定了上下文因素(如预先存在的治疗期望)的作用。然而,尚未考虑患者-治疗师沟通中口头传达的治疗期望的影响,也未考虑皮质醇变化在慢性颈痛患者中的安慰剂/反安慰剂反应中的作用。
检验在物理治疗实践中口头传达的治疗期望对临床结果的影响,并确定皮质醇水平的变化是否与颈痛和残疾的变化相关。
83 例慢性颈痛患者在物理治疗干预期间随机分配到 3 种不同的口头传达期望(积极、消极、中性)。
唾液皮质醇、疼痛和残疾以及颈椎活动度。
积极(P<0.001)和中性(P<0.001)期望组的疼痛均显著改善。对于唾液皮质醇水平,中性(P=0.045)和消极(P<0.001)期望组在治疗时观察到皮质醇水平显著升高。在中性和消极期望组中,未发现唾液皮质醇水平变化与疼痛变化之间存在显著相关性。
治疗慢性颈痛患者的物理治疗师在向患者传达预期的治疗效果时应保持警惕。虽然口头传达积极或中性期望可能对与疼痛相关的措施有益,但给予消极期望可能导致疼痛无治疗反应。皮质醇水平在对中性和消极期望的口头传达作出反应时升高,而没有出现反安慰剂效应。这对皮质醇在反安慰剂效应中的假定作用提出了质疑。