Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Mar 15;103(4):823-833. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.020. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
The phase 3 Hypofractionated Irradiation for Prostate Cancer trial compared hypofractionated radiation therapy with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. Similar 5-year relapse-free survival rates were achieved in both groups, but noninferiority of hypofractionation was not confirmed for genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity. Here, we present the secondary trial endpoint on patient-reported quality of life.
A total of 820 patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer were randomized to hypofractionation (19 fractions of 3.4 Gy) or conventional fractionation (39 fractions of 2.0 Gy). Quality of life was measured using a validated questionnaire, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Prostate Cancer 25 module. Subscales (score range, 0-100) on urinary symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, symptoms related to androgen deprivation therapy, sexual function, and sexual activity were analyzed. Changes from baseline of at least 5 points were considered clinically relevant. Inferiority of hypofractionation for separate subscales was rejected if the mean difference in the 3-year incidence of clinically relevant deterioration between treatments was <8.0%.
A total of 697 men were eligible for this quality-of-life analysis. Baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups. At 3-year follow-up, the incidence of clinically relevant deterioration of urinary symptoms was 33% for both treatments (difference 0.49% in favor of conventional fractionation; 90% confidence interval, -7.20% to 8.18%). Such deterioration of gastrointestinal symptoms was reported in 38% of patients receiving hypofractionation versus 36% of patients receiving conventional fractionation (2.03% in favor of conventional fractionation; 90% confidence interval, -6.18% to 10.23%). Therefore, we could not demonstrate noninferiority of hypofractionation for genitourinary and gastrointestinal quality of life. For all other subscales, noninferiority of hypofractionation was demonstrated.
Noninferiority of the hypofractionated treatment was not demonstrated for genitourinary and gastrointestinal quality of life, and therefore we cannot rule out that relevant differences may exist between both treatments. Noninferiority of hypofractionation was demonstrated for symptoms related to androgen deprivation therapy, sexual activity, and sexual function.
III 期 Hypofractionated Irradiation for Prostate Cancer 试验比较了前列腺癌局限性患者的短程放疗和常规分割放疗。两组均达到了相似的 5 年无复发生存率,但未能证实短程放疗在泌尿生殖和胃肠道毒性方面具有非劣效性。在此,我们报告了次要试验终点患者报告的生活质量。
共 820 例中危或高危前列腺癌患者被随机分为短程放疗(19 次,每次 3.4Gy)或常规分割放疗(39 次,每次 2.0Gy)。使用经过验证的问卷,欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷前列腺癌 25 模块,来测量生活质量。分析尿症状、胃肠道症状、雄激素剥夺治疗相关症状、性功能和性活动的亚量表(评分范围:0-100)。如果两种治疗方法 3 年内临床相关恶化的平均差异<8.0%,则认为短程放疗的各亚量表存在临床劣势。
共有 697 名男性符合本生活质量分析条件。两组基线特征无差异。在 3 年随访时,两种治疗方法的尿症状临床相关恶化发生率均为 33%(短程放疗组优势比为 0.49%,90%置信区间为-7.20%至 8.18%)。接受短程放疗的患者中有 38%报告胃肠道症状恶化,而接受常规分割放疗的患者中有 36%报告胃肠道症状恶化(常规分割放疗组优势比为 2.03%,90%置信区间为-6.18%至 10.23%)。因此,我们无法证明短程放疗在泌尿生殖和胃肠道生活质量方面具有非劣效性。对于所有其他亚量表,均证明了短程放疗的非劣效性。
在泌尿生殖和胃肠道生活质量方面,短程放疗的非劣效性未得到证实,因此我们不能排除两种治疗方法之间可能存在相关差异。短程放疗在雄激素剥夺治疗相关症状、性活动和性功能方面具有非劣效性。