Gross-Hardt Sascha, Boehning Fiete, Steinseifer Ulrich, Schmitz-Rode Thomas, Kaufmann Tim A S
Department of Cardiovascular Engineering,Institute of Applied Medical Engineering,Helmholtz Institute,RWTH Aachen University,Pauwelsstrasse 20,Aachen 52074, Germany.
Enmodes GmbH,Aachen 52074, Germanye-mail:
J Biomech Eng. 2019 Feb 1;141(2). doi: 10.1115/1.4042043.
The reduction of excessive, nonphysiologic shear stresses leading to blood trauma can be the key to overcome many of the associated complications in blood recirculating devices. In that regard, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are gaining in importance for the hydraulic and hemocompatibility assessment. Still, direct hemolysis assessments with CFD remain inaccurate and limited to qualitative comparisons rather than quantitative predictions. An underestimated quantity for improved blood damage prediction accuracy is the influence of near-wall mesh resolution on shear stress quantification in regions of complex flows. This study investigated the necessary mesh refinement to quantify shear stress for two selected, meshing sensitive hotspots within a rotary centrifugal blood pump (the blade leading edge and tip clearance gap). The shear stress in these regions is elevated due to presence of stagnation points and the flow around a sharp edge. The nondimensional mesh characteristic number y+, which is known in the context of turbulence modeling, underestimated the maximum wall shear stress by 60% on average with the recommended value of 1, but was found to be exact below 0.1. To evaluate the meshing related error on the numerical hemolysis prediction, three-dimensional simulations of a generic centrifugal pump were performed with mesh sizes from 3 × 106 to 30 × 106 elements. The respective hemolysis was calculated using an Eulerian scalar transport model. Mesh insensitivity was found below a maximum y+ of 0.2 necessitating 18 × 106 mesh elements. A meshing related error of up to 25% was found for the coarser meshes. Further investigations need to address: (1) the transferability to other geometries and (2) potential adaptions on blood damage estimation models to allow better quantitative predictions.
减少导致血液损伤的过度、非生理性剪切应力可能是克服血液再循环装置中许多相关并发症的关键。在这方面,计算流体动力学(CFD)在水力和血液相容性评估中的重要性日益增加。然而,使用CFD进行的直接溶血评估仍然不准确,仅限于定性比较而非定量预测。对于提高血液损伤预测准确性而言,一个被低估的因素是近壁网格分辨率对复杂流动区域中剪切应力量化的影响。本研究调查了在旋转离心血泵内两个选定的、对网格划分敏感的热点区域(叶片前缘和叶尖间隙)进行剪切应力量化所需的网格细化情况。由于驻点的存在以及尖锐边缘周围的流动,这些区域的剪切应力会升高。在湍流建模中已知的无量纲网格特征数y+,在推荐值为1时,平均低估最大壁面剪切应力60%,但发现当y+低于0.1时是准确的。为了评估数值溶血预测中与网格划分相关的误差,对一个通用离心泵进行了三维模拟,网格尺寸从3×106到30×106个单元。使用欧拉标量输运模型计算各自的溶血情况。发现当最大y+低于0.2时,网格不敏感,这需要18×106个网格单元。对于较粗的网格,发现与网格划分相关的误差高达25%。进一步的研究需要解决:(1)向其他几何形状的可转移性,以及(2)对血液损伤估计模型的潜在调整,以实现更好的定量预测。