Chappell Andrew J, Allwood Daniel M, Simper Trevor N
Food and Nutrition Group, Sheffield School of Business, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Department of Biosciences and Chemistry, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
J Diet Suppl. 2020;17(3):249-260. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2018.1513433. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
Citrulline malate (CM) is purported to buffer lactic acid, enhance oxygen delivery, and attenuate muscle soreness. Anaerobic exercise trials with CM have produced conflicting results. The aim of the current investigation was to test the efficacy of CM on resistance training (RT) with the hypothesis that CM would improve performance. A double-blind, counter-balanced, randomized control trial was utilized to assess the effects of CM on RT. Nineteen participants (8 female) (25.7 ± 7.7 years), regularly engaged in RT, consumed either 8 g of CM (1.1:1 ratio) or a placebo (6 g citric acid). Participants attempted to perform a German Volume Training (GVT) protocol comprising 10 sets of 10 repetitions of barbell curls at 80% of their one repetition maximum. Repeated ANOVA suggested no effect of CM on RT performance (treatment × time × order = .217). There was no difference ( = .320) in the total number of reps over the 10 sets (CM median = 57, IQR 45-73; placebo median = 61, IQR 51-69). Blood lactate and creatine kinase did not differ between CM and placebo ( > .05). Finally, total muscle soreness was reduced significantly in CM compared to placebo (treatment × time × order = .004). These results require corroboration; an ergogenic benefit is yet to be established, and weight trainers should exercise caution when assessing the efficacy of CM. Future research should focus on the potential effects of loading doses of CM.
瓜氨酸苹果酸盐(CM)据称可缓冲乳酸、增强氧气输送并减轻肌肉酸痛。使用CM进行的无氧运动试验结果相互矛盾。本研究的目的是测试CM对阻力训练(RT)的功效,假设CM会提高运动表现。采用双盲、平衡、随机对照试验来评估CM对RT的影响。19名参与者(8名女性)(年龄25.7±7.7岁),经常进行RT,分别服用8克CM(1.1:1比例)或安慰剂(6克柠檬酸)。参与者尝试按照德国大容量训练(GVT)方案进行,包括以一次最大重复量的80%进行10组,每组10次杠铃弯举。重复方差分析表明CM对RT表现没有影响(处理×时间×顺序=.217)。10组的总重复次数没有差异(=.320)(CM中位数=57,四分位间距45 - 73;安慰剂中位数=61,四分位间距51 - 69)。CM组和安慰剂组之间的血乳酸和肌酸激酶没有差异(>.05)。最后,与安慰剂相比,CM组的总肌肉酸痛明显减轻(处理×时间×顺序=.004)。这些结果需要进一步证实;尚未确定其促力作用,力量训练者在评估CM的功效时应谨慎。未来的研究应关注CM负荷剂量的潜在影响。