• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨干骨不连的临床疗效:双钢板固定与带增强钢板的交锁髓内钉更换术对比

Clinical outcomes of femoral shaft non-union: dual plating versus exchange nailing with augmentation plating.

作者信息

Zhang Wei, Zhang Zhuo, Li Jiantao, Zhang Licheng, Chen Hua, Tang Peifu

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 28 Fu-Xing Road, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Nov 20;13(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1002-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-018-1002-z
PMID:30458810
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6247613/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

By comparing clinical outcomes between dual plating (DP) and exchange nailing with augmentation plating (EN/AP), we aimed to provide better treatment strategies for femoral shaft non-union.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients with aseptic femoral shaft non-union at our level 1 trauma center between January 2014 and January 2017. All patients underwent a one-stage, definitive revision procedure, including DP for 16 patients and EN/AP for 14 patients. Perioperative surgical trauma, fracture healing, complications, and the time to return to work were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients achieved fracture healing. In the EN/AP group, the fracture healing rate was 100%, the healing time was 5.7 ± 1.7 months, and the time of return to work was 8.2 ± 2.9 months. In the DP group, the fracture healing rate was 94%, the healing time was 8.4 ± 4.1 months, and the time of return to work was 18.4 ± 10.3 months. In terms of fracture healing and return to work, the patients in the EN/AP group required less time than those in the DP group, and the differences were statistically significant (p = 0.024 and p < 0.01 respectively). Except for the length of the incision, the two groups showed no statistically significant differences in operative time, postoperative deformity, and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Both EN/AP and DP are important surgical options for femoral shaft non-union. Compared to DP, EN/AP resulted in a shorter incision, faster fracture healing, and a shorter time to return to work.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-ORC-17014062.

摘要

背景

通过比较双钢板固定(DP)与带锁髓内钉联合钢板固定(EN/AP)的临床疗效,我们旨在为股骨干骨不连提供更好的治疗策略。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2014年1月至2017年1月期间在我们一级创伤中心接受治疗的30例无菌性股骨干骨不连患者。所有患者均接受一期确定性翻修手术,其中16例采用DP治疗,14例采用EN/AP治疗。评估围手术期手术创伤、骨折愈合情况、并发症以及恢复工作的时间。

结果

29例患者实现骨折愈合。在EN/AP组中,骨折愈合率为100%,愈合时间为5.7±1.7个月,恢复工作时间为8.2±2.9个月。在DP组中,骨折愈合率为94%,愈合时间为8.4±4.1个月,恢复工作时间为18.4±10.3个月。在骨折愈合和恢复工作方面,EN/AP组患者所需时间比DP组少,差异具有统计学意义(分别为p = 0.024和p < 0.01)。除切口长度外,两组在手术时间、术后畸形和并发症方面无统计学显著差异。

结论

EN/AP和DP都是股骨干骨不连的重要手术选择。与DP相比,EN/AP切口更短,骨折愈合更快,恢复工作时间更短。

试验注册号

ChiCTR-ORC-17014062。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f22/6247613/29c2feda1c2a/13018_2018_1002_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f22/6247613/56749544df37/13018_2018_1002_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f22/6247613/d77843fa14e4/13018_2018_1002_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f22/6247613/29c2feda1c2a/13018_2018_1002_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f22/6247613/56749544df37/13018_2018_1002_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f22/6247613/d77843fa14e4/13018_2018_1002_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f22/6247613/29c2feda1c2a/13018_2018_1002_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes of femoral shaft non-union: dual plating versus exchange nailing with augmentation plating.股骨干骨不连的临床疗效:双钢板固定与带增强钢板的交锁髓内钉更换术对比
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Nov 20;13(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1002-z.
2
Effectiveness of exchange K-nail and augmented plating in aseptic femoral diaphyseal non-union.交锁髓内钉与增强钢板治疗股骨骨干无菌性骨不连的疗效
Injury. 2017 Aug;48 Suppl 2:S61-S65. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30496-5.
3
Augmentative antirotational plating provided a significantly higher union rate than exchanging reamed nailing in treatment for femoral shaft aseptic atrophic nonunion - retrospective cohort study.增强抗旋转钢板治疗股骨干无菌性萎缩性骨不连的愈合率显著高于交锁髓内钉置换——回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Mar 25;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2514-3.
4
The treatment of nonisthmal femoral shaft nonunions with im nail exchange versus augmentation plating.带锁髓内钉翻修与接骨板内固定治疗非干骺端股骨干骨不连
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Feb;24(2):89-94. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b8dafd.
5
Augmentation plating leaving the nail in situ is an excellent option for treating femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing: a multicentre study.原位保留髓内钉的钢板增强术是治疗髓内钉固定术后股骨干骨不连的极佳选择:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1895-1901. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01333-0. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
6
Indications and outcomes of augmentation plating with decortication and autogenous bone grafting for femoral shaft nonunions.带皮质剥脱和自体骨移植的增强钢板固定治疗股骨干骨不连的适应症和疗效
Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1820-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.02.021. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
7
Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta-analysis.髓内钉固定后股骨干骨折不愈合的附加接骨板与交锁髓内钉治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):50-57. doi: 10.1111/os.12580. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
8
Reunion of post nail aseptic non-union of diaphyseal femoral fractures by augmentation plating, decortication and bone grafting - Replacement for exchange nailing.带锁髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折术后骨不连的再手术:扩髓植骨、接骨板固定——取代交锁髓内钉。
Injury. 2021 Jun;52(6):1529-1533. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.036. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
9
[Comparison of two surgical methods for aseptic nonunions of femoral shaft orthopaedic surgery].[两种用于股骨干无菌性骨不连的骨科手术方法的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;27(1):25-9.
10
Augmentation plating in management of failed femoral nailing.股骨钉固定失败后的增强钢板治疗
Injury. 2017 Aug;48 Suppl 2:S23-S26. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30490-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of infected bone defects of the femoral shaft by Masquelet technique: sequential internal fixation and nail with plate augmentation.采用Masquelet技术治疗股骨干感染性骨缺损:序贯内固定及钢板增强髓内钉固定
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 17;25(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07681-x.
2
Delayed Union and Nonunion: Current Concepts, Prevention, and Correction: A Review.延迟愈合与骨不连:当前概念、预防及矫正:综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 22;11(6):525. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060525.
3
ON Path: outpatient nonunion pathway for lower-extremity nonunions.

本文引用的文献

1
[Recent advances in treatment of aseptic femoral shaft nonunion].[无菌性股骨干骨不连治疗的最新进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 May 15;32(5):519-525. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201712089.
2
Treatment of aseptic non-union after intramedullary nailing without removal of the nail.髓内钉固定后无菌性骨不连的治疗,无需取出髓内钉
Injury. 2017 Jun;48 Suppl 1:S76-S81. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 6.
3
Plate augmentation and autologous bone grafting after intramedullary nailing for challenging femoral bone defects: a technical note.
路径:下肢骨不连的门诊骨不连治疗路径
OTA Int. 2022 Oct 13;5(4):e218. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000218. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Collagen/Nano-hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffold Application with Exchange Reamed Nailing Accelerates Bone Union and Improves Quality of Life in Atrophic Femoral Shaft Nonunions: A Retrospective Comparative Study.胶原蛋白/纳米羟基磷灰石复合支架联合交锁髓内钉治疗对萎缩性股骨干骨不连骨愈合及生活质量的影响:一项回顾性对照研究
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Oct 19;56(3):412-420. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00545-9. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Failure of dual plating in a complex open distal femur fracture as the result of major trauma.复杂开放性股骨远端骨折因严重创伤导致双钢板固定失败。
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Dec 1;14(12):e245362. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-245362.
6
A 3D-printed, personalized, biomechanics-specific beta-tricalcium phosphate bioceramic rod system: personalized treatment strategy for patients with femoral shaft non-union based on finite element analysis.一种 3D 打印的、个性化的、针对生物力学的β-磷酸三钙生物陶瓷棒系统:基于有限元分析的股骨干骨不连患者的个性化治疗策略。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03465-1.
7
[Research progress of augmentation plate for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation].[髓内钉固定后股骨干骨不连的增强钢板研究进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 15;33(12):1467-1473. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201903073.
8
Biomechanical Evaluation of Dual Plate Configurations for Femoral Shaft Fracture Fixation.双钢板固定股骨干骨折的生物力学评价。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Apr 28;2019:5958631. doi: 10.1155/2019/5958631. eCollection 2019.
髓内钉固定后用于治疗具有挑战性的股骨骨缺损的钢板增强和自体骨移植:技术说明
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Oct;136(10):1381-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2522-9. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
4
Is the Wave Plate Still a Salvage Procedure for Femoral Non-union? Results of 75 Cases Treated with a Locked Wave Plate.波形钢板仍是治疗股骨骨不连的挽救性手术吗?75例应用锁定波形钢板治疗的结果
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Apr;35(2):127-31. doi: 10.1007/s00068-008-8009-9. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
5
Nonunion of the Femur and Tibia: An Update.股骨和胫骨骨不连:最新进展
Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Apr;47(2):365-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.09.010.
6
Dynamizations and Exchanges: Success Rates and Indications.动态化与置换:成功率与适应症
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Dec;29(12):569-73. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000311.
7
Treatment of the femoral shaft nonunion with double plate fixation and bone grafting: A case series of 14 patients.双钢板固定联合植骨治疗股骨干骨不连:14例病例系列报告
Injury. 2015;46(6):1102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
8
Effectiveness of exchange nailing and augmentation plating for femoral shaft nonunion after nailing.交锁髓内钉与增强钢板治疗髓内钉固定术后股骨干骨不连的疗效比较
Int Orthop. 2014 Nov;38(11):2343-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2456-1. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
9
Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature.股骨干骨不连的手术治疗:文献系统综述
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2013 Aug;8(2):77-88. doi: 10.1007/s11751-013-0168-5. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
10
Evaluation of methods and timing in nail dynamisation for treating delayed healing femoral shaft fractures.评估治疗股骨干延迟愈合的钉动力化方法和时机。
Injury. 2012 Oct;43(10):1747-52. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.024. Epub 2012 Jul 28.