• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期随访显示微创打孔技术用于经皮骨锚定式助听设备的稳定性和患者满意度。

Long term follow-up demonstrating stability and patient satisfaction of minimally invasive punch technique for percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov 20;47(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0316-5.

DOI:10.1186/s40463-018-0316-5
PMID:30458887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6247525/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery (MIPS) was recently described to facilitate the placement of percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices. As early adopters of this new procedure, we sought to perform a quality assurance project using our own small prospective cohort to justify this change in practice. We chose to examine device stability and to gauge our patients' perspective of the surgery and their overall satisfaction with the process.

METHODS

A total of 12 adult patients who underwent MIPS between 2016 and 2017 with a minimum post-operative follow-up of 12 months were included in this study. A prospective MIPS research clinic was used to follow patients, assess the implant site soft tissue status and gather qualitative information through patient interviews and surveys.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) soft tissue status score averages using the IPS Scale were low for inflammation 0.1 (0.1), pain 0.1 (0.1), skin height 0.2 (0.1) and total IPS score 0.4 (0.3) indicating minimal soft tissue changes. Patient experiences with MIPS were overwhelmingly positive in reports through the MIPS modified SSQ-8. All patients reported speedy recoveries and no long-term complications. There were zero device losses.

CONCLUSION

The series presented in this paper represents the first MIPS cohort with long term follow-up to be published to date in North America. Our findings conclude both device stability and patient satisfaction with no loss of fixtures. Consequently, we have adopted MIPS as our procedure of choice for the placement of all percutaneous BAHDs.

摘要

目的

微创耳后入路(MIPS)最近被描述为便于经皮骨锚定听力设备的植入。作为这种新手术的早期采用者,我们试图通过自己的小前瞻性队列进行质量保证项目,以证明这种手术实践的改变是合理的。我们选择检查设备的稳定性,并评估患者对手术的看法以及他们对整个过程的总体满意度。

方法

本研究共纳入 12 例 2016 年至 2017 年间接受 MIPS 治疗的成年患者,术后随访时间至少为 12 个月。采用前瞻性 MIPS 研究诊所对患者进行随访,评估植入部位软组织状况,并通过患者访谈和调查收集定性信息。

结果

使用 IPS 量表评估的平均(SD)软组织状况评分均较低,炎症为 0.1(0.1),疼痛为 0.1(0.1),皮肤高度为 0.2(0.1),总 IPS 评分为 0.4(0.3),表明软组织变化极小。通过 MIPS 修改后的 SSQ-8 报告,患者对 MIPS 的体验绝大多数是积极的。所有患者均报告恢复迅速,无长期并发症。无设备丢失。

结论

本文介绍的系列代表了迄今为止在北美发表的第一个具有长期随访的 MIPS 队列。我们的研究结果表明,设备稳定性和患者满意度均无设备丢失。因此,我们已将 MIPS 作为所有经皮 BAHD 植入术的首选术式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b516/6247525/1251ff9cb415/40463_2018_316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b516/6247525/9b536db7e601/40463_2018_316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b516/6247525/1251ff9cb415/40463_2018_316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b516/6247525/9b536db7e601/40463_2018_316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b516/6247525/1251ff9cb415/40463_2018_316_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long term follow-up demonstrating stability and patient satisfaction of minimally invasive punch technique for percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices.长期随访显示微创打孔技术用于经皮骨锚定式助听设备的稳定性和患者满意度。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov 20;47(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0316-5.
2
Experience with Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and Linear Incision Approach for Pediatric and Adult Bone Anchored Hearing Implants.小儿及成人骨锚式助听器的微创桥接手术和线性切口入路经验
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020 Apr;129(4):380-387. doi: 10.1177/0003489419891451. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
Direct cost comparison of minimally invasive punch technique versus traditional approaches for percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices.经皮骨锚式听力装置微创打孔技术与传统方法的直接成本比较
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun 12;46(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0222-2.
4
Standardization of the Punch Technique for the Implantation of Bone Anchored Auditory Devices: Evaluation of the MIPS Surgical Set.骨锚定听觉设备植入的冲切技术标准化:MIPS 手术套件的评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jul;40(6):e631-e635. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002291.
5
A retrospective evaluation of minimally invasive ponto surgery (MIPS) in two pediatric centers.对两个儿科中心的微创桥手术(MIPS)进行的回顾性评估。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2021 Sep;22(5):265-269. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1903712. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
6
Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.与不进行软组织复位的线性切口技术相比,用于骨传导听力植入物的微创桥手术:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2016 Nov 9;17(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1662-0.
7
Osseointegrated hearing implant surgery using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated concave abutment design.采用新型羟基磷灰石涂层凹形基台设计的骨整合式听力植入手术。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec;151(6):1014-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599814551150. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
8
Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.打孔与钻孔:通过微小皮肤打孔切口植入骨锚式听力装置与使用皮刀及软组织减容植入法的比较
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Mar;125(3):199-206. doi: 10.1177/0003489415606447. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
9
Tissue Preservation Techniques for Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Surgery.骨锚式助听器手术中的组织保存技术。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Aug 1;42(7):1044-1050. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003157.
10
Comparison between linear incision and punch techniques for bone anchored hearing aid surgery.线性切口与冲切技术在骨锚式助听器手术中的比较。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2021 Oct;41(5):474-480. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1048.

引用本文的文献

1
In-office Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants via Minimally Invasive Punch Technique in a Veteran Population.门诊微创经皮穿刺技术植入骨锚式助听器在退伍军人中的应用。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;167(6):959-963. doi: 10.1177/01945998221086841. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
2
Comparison between linear incision and punch techniques for bone anchored hearing aid surgery.线性切口与冲切技术在骨锚式助听器手术中的比较。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2021 Oct;41(5):474-480. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1048.
3
Patient surgical satisfaction after da Vinci single-port and multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: propensity score-matched analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery Versus the Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Bone Conduction Hearing Implants: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.微创耳后入路与保留软组织的直线切口技术在骨导式助听植入中的应用:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Aug;39(7):882-893. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001852.
2
The IPS-scale: A new soft tissue assessment scale for percutaneous and transcutaneous implants for bone conduction devices.IPS量表:一种用于骨传导装置经皮和经皮植入物的新型软组织评估量表。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Dec;42(6):1410-1413. doi: 10.1111/coa.12922. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
达芬奇单孔和多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者手术满意度:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):473-481. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01269-6. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
4
Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.微创桥接手术与保留软组织的线性切口技术用于经皮骨传导装置植入的长期疗效比较
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 24;12:632987. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.632987. eCollection 2021.
5
Punch vs open surgical techniques for placement of bone-anchored hearing implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of skin reactions and operating time.经皮与开放式手术植入骨锚定式听力植入物的比较:皮肤反应和手术时间的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Sep;278(9):3171-3180. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06511-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
6
Implantation of a new active bone conduction hearing device with optimized geometry.植入具有优化几何形状的新型有源骨传导听力装置。
HNO. 2020 Aug;68(Suppl 2):106-115. doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00877-2.
7
Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review.十年的 Ponto 骨锚式听力系统应用经验——系统文献回顾。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 Sep;45(5):667-680. doi: 10.1111/coa.13556. Epub 2020 May 25.
Direct cost comparison of minimally invasive punch technique versus traditional approaches for percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices.
经皮骨锚式听力装置微创打孔技术与传统方法的直接成本比较
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun 12;46(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0222-2.
4
Findings from the experience with the punch technique for auditory osseointegrated implants: A retrospective single center comparative study.听觉骨整合植入物打孔技术的经验结果:一项回顾性单中心对照研究。
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed). 2017 Nov-Dec;68(6):309-316. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 May 23.
5
Short-term results from seventy-six patients receiving a bone-anchored hearing implant installed with a novel minimally invasive surgery technique.76例患者采用新型微创手术技术植入骨锚式听力植入物的短期结果。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Oct;42(5):1043-1048. doi: 10.1111/coa.12803. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
6
Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.与不进行软组织复位的线性切口技术相比,用于骨传导听力植入物的微创桥手术:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2016 Nov 9;17(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1662-0.
7
The new Baha implant: a prospective osseointegration study.新的 Baha 植入物:一项前瞻性骨整合研究。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jun;146(6):979-83. doi: 10.1177/0194599812438042. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
8
Outcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trial.骨锚式助听器植入术(不进行皮肤减薄)的结果:一项前瞻性临床试验。
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Sep;32(7):1134-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822a1c47.
9
Successes and complications of the Baha system.骨锚式助听器系统的成功案例与并发症
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Dec;29(8):1115-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318187e186.
10
The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment.骨锚式助听器:生活质量评估。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Apr;130(4):394-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.4.394.